User talk:Ben5218

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

منتخب تونس[edit]

مرحبا صديقي، هل يمكنك رسم هذه الأطقم لمنتخب تونس لكرة القدم.

Mohamed Amine Trabelsi Talk 20:21, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبًا! يمكنني بالتأكيد أن أفعل ذلك. سأحاول أن أبدأ بصنعهم غدًا بمشيئة الله، بمجرد انتهاء مناوبتي. قد يستغرق تصنيع الطقم الثالث بعض الوقت، ولكن على الأقل أن يكون هناك مشكلة في الإثنين الآخرين.
سأقوم بإبلاغك هنا بمجرد الانتهاء من تحضيرهم.
Ben5218 (talk) 22:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
مرحبا زميلي، هنالك من قام برسم الطقم الأول والثاني، لذا يمكنك رسم الطقم الثالث فقط.

Mohamed Amine Trabelsi Talk 01:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@محمد أمين الطرابلسي: أهلًا يا محمد، وكل عام وانت بخير.

أعتذر على التأخير في الرد. أؤكد لك أنني لم أنس الطقم الذي طلبت مني تحضيره، ولكني بصراحة لم استطع تنفيذه بشكل جيد مطابق للنسخة الفعلية من الطقم، والشكل الذي استطعت الوصول إليه غير دقيق مقارنة بباقي الأطقم التي قمت بصنعها من قبل، ولذلك لم استطع رفعه. أعتذر لك مرة أخرى. Ben5218 (talk) 13:59, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, Ben5218. Thank you for your work on 2024 Egyptian League Cup final. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Beni Ebeid SC for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beni Ebeid SC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beni Ebeid SC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Govvy (talk) 10:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe articles like this one on the town is far more important to fix up than the football club. And there are many like that. Fixing up sports articles is always a good thing, but there should be a priority level to articles for towns, cities and places which would help promote Egypt and give Egyptian geographical coverage on wikipedia a better light. That's my two cents, regards. Govvy (talk) 10:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I also think that improving articles about cities or towns is with no doubt far more important than fixing clubs' articles, especially if these clubs are playing in low tiers.
However, in my case, I'm more familiar with football and sports in general (I work for a local sports apparel company), so I tend more to improve articles about clubs or competitions' seasons rather than anything else. Had the case been different with me, I would have fixed over hundreds of non sports-related articles here on Wikipedia in the past few years.
Of course, that doesn't mean that I'm not open or not willing to fix other articles; I'd be more than happy to do that, but I think that now is not an appropriate time for me to take this step. Hopefully, you get my point, thanks. Ben5218 (talk) 03:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2023–24 in African fourth tier association football leagues indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 20:14, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ben5218,

Please do not empty a category "out of process", especially large categories. Doing so means removing all of the contents of a category and then tagging it for speedy deletion as an empty category, CSD C1. If you believe a category should be merged, renamed or deleted, please make a proposal at WP:CFD. This is especially important for older categories with substantial page histories. This isn't the case for the two categories you emptied, just letting you know for the future. Emptying a category out of process can be grounds for reverting your edits doing so so please do not do this in the future.

An exception is if you are taking on a recategorization for an entire category tree but that is usually left for editors whose editing on the project focuses upon category work but I don't think that is the case here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 15:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Liz! Thanks for taking time to leave me this note. I can assure you that I did this just because there was no strong or obvious reason to categorize Egyptian Premier League seasons' articles by century. Looking at other football leagues seasons' categories, such as Category:Bundesliga seasons and Category:Premier League seasons, you will notice that there's only one category containing all articles, rather than having a category for each century. I thought that what I did was uncontroversial and wouldn't face any objections. Had the case been different, I would've listed these categories for discussion rather than emptying the categories immediately. Ben5218 (talk) 15:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]