User talk:ZX2006XZ/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Marketing

Please don't add a mundane timeline of when marketing materials of a film were released, like at Better Nate Than Never (film). Per WP:FILMMARKETING: "Do not merely identify and describe the content of customary marketing methods such as trailers, TV spots, radio ads, and posters. Instead, use reliable sources to provide useful commentary about a method, such as a trailer's intended effect or the audience's reported reaction to it." BOVINEBOY2008 18:55, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Better Nate Than Ever.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Better Nate Than Ever.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DisneyToon Studios logo (2003-2011).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:DisneyToon Studios logo (2003-2011).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Information icon It appears that you copied or moved text from Steamboat Willie to Walt Disney Animation Studios. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 21:22, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

Warning icon Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you keep doing at List of Walt Disney Pictures films (and similar articles), relating to 20th Century Animation in regards to The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild and Diary of a Wimpy Kid. I have clearly communicated this already multiple times in previous reverts as to why your additions are being removed. On Wikipedia, we are based on what reliable sources say. You can not add content like that based on what you think is true. Adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, is a violation of Wikipedia's no original research policy. This has been addressed to you by myself and multiple other editors in the past. Judging from your edit history, you have been aware of these warnings. If you keep disruptive editing, you may be blocked from editing. ~ Jedi94 (Want to tell me something?) 06:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Direct-to-videos

We are not making the list more like Sony Pictures Animation. Leave it as is it and don't change nothing from it. it's fine the way it was. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 16:41, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Rodrick Rules (2022) logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Rodrick Rules (2022) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puss in Boots: The Last Wish (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Doric Loon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Nothing has changed since this was declined a week ago, and I agree with the decision of my predecessor. Please have patience. If, as is to be expected, this film is actually released in September, this draft will almost certainly meet notability criteria. Please resubmit it then, and I promise to review the submission immediately - by all means leave a note on my talk-page to remind me. At that point, there will be some work to do merging the information which is currently at Puss in Boots (2011 film)#Sequel Meanwhile, just keep the draft up-to-date with any new (properly sourced) information that becomes available.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Doric Loon (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, ZX2006XZ! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Doric Loon (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Puss in Boots The Last Wish poster.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Puss in Boots The Last Wish poster.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:03, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:05, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Paw Patrol The Might Movie logo.jpeg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Paw Patrol The Might Movie logo.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 00:07, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

If Your Not Busy

I was wondering if you’d be able to help out with this draft, thanks for reading this. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Paramount_Game_Studios SlySabre (talk) 21:16, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Image licensing

You need to explain your thought process on this edit. Whpq (talk) 12:59, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Well, the logo is trademarked. ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:39, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

You applied {{PD-textlogo}}. How is a picture of a boy fishing while sitting on a crescent moon even remotely close to text? -- Whpq (talk) 14:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
"PD-textlogo" applies to logos that have only text and/or geometric shapes. In the case of DreamWorks Animation's 2018 logo, there is text, along with two shapes. Now you could point out the boy on the crescent moon (a shape, by the way), but other than that, "PD-textlogo" applies to this logo. ZX2006XZ (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2022 (UTC)
The text you quoted specifically states "applies to logos that have only text and/or geometric shapes". It does not apply to selected part of a logo. It is for the entire logo. It's clear you have difficulty with understanding copyright. That's okay. Copyright can be very complicated. What is not okay is to be making licensing changes without any understanding of what you are doing and failing to learn from mistakes. You have been twice blocked on Commons for copyright issues and your unblock request there was denied because you claim you understand what you did wrong and yet in the very same unblock request admit that you actually don't know what license applied. If you have questions, you can ask at Media Copyright Questions. -- Whpq (talk) 17:28, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Unblock an IP address

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
ZX2006XZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "ThisUserIsRandom". The reason given for ThisUserIsRandom's block is: "Vandalism-only account; see also filter log".

Accept reason: The blocking admin has agreed to soften that block. — Daniel Case (talk) 15:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Thoughts on a Draft I’ve Been Working On?

I didn’t create the draft, but I’ve significantly contributed heavily to it so far: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Talking_Friends SlySabre (talk) 19:28, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 20th Century Studios into 20th Century Animation. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Please begin fulfilling this mandatory legal requirement. Thanks, 22:19, 24 March 2022 (UTC)— Diannaa (talk)

Sorry. I forgot. ZX2006XZ (talk) 22:29, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sonic the Hedgehog (film series) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sonic the Hedgehog (film series). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 15:09, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Hey, I've read your comment. Since you're an administrator, could you unlock the redirect, that redirect being Sonic the Hedgehog (film series)? Thanks. ZX2006XZ (talk) 18:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Recent edits to film articles

ZX2006XZ, it appears you are touching a massive amount of articles in a short period of time, adding content like this. First, the lead section is meant to summarize the article's most important points. Stating that a film was the thirteenth film from a studio is not a significant detail, and in fact, it's not even mentioned anywhere in the article's body. So this action goes against the purpose of the lead, which is to summarize. Also see WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY for more info.

Please slow down and take a moment to learn more about the lead and its purpose. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to me on my talk page or go to WP:TEA, which is being monitored by other experienced editors willing to help. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 09:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 original poster.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sonic the Hedgehog 2 original poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

File:Embrace the Panda - Making Turning Red.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Embrace the Panda - Making Turning Red.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)

Proposal for New WikiProject

I have created a new proposal for a new WikiProject, being for Blue Sky Studios, seen here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Proposals/Blue_Sky_Studios

Let me know what you think, thanks! SlySabre (talk) 16:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Looks great and all, but I'm kind of speechless. I mean, Disney has a WikiProject of its own, which makes own because it encompasses Disney movies, TV shows, parks, etc. ZX2006XZ (talk) 16:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
That’s true. I do think that maybe we could merge it into a WikiProject for 20th Century Studios. It would be a sub-WikiProject of WikiProject Disney and WikiProject Film that would have editors who are more interested in the field of 20th rather than through the mainline Disney brand. Plus, we could have Blue Sky and Searchlight be sub-WikiProjects. Should I do that instead? SlySabre (talk) 17:05, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Okay, I looked to see if there was a WikiProject for 20th Century Studios, and there isn't one, so I guess it makes sense. But we should propose a WikiProject for Fox first. ZX2006XZ (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
I decide to create a proposal for a 20th Century Studios Wikiproject at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/20th Century Studios. ZX2006XZ (talk) 17:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Nice! I’ve merged my proposal this since it only makes sense to do so. (Because of this I call dibs on managing the Blue Sky sub-project since I had the idea lol.) SlySabre (talk) 17:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

Scrat Tales is out!

Now we just gotta wait for reviews to come out. Btw, have you seen in yet? No spoilers please, but out of curiosity, does the Blue Sky intro appear? SlySabre (talk) 12:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

I have no idea. Maybe it will. I don't expect it to, though, but maybe it will. I did find a review, btw: https://www.leisurebyte.com/ice-age-scrat-tales-review-disney/ ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Yeah that and one YouTube video are the only ones I’ve found so far, but unfortunately, the sources aren’t that notable. SlySabre (talk) 12:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Dang, the reviews for Adventures of Buck Wild came out fast, but for Scrat Tales, they’re coming out sooooo slowly… SlySabre (talk) 13:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
Btw, if you guys are improving Scrat, I added more sources at User:SlySabre/sandbox under Scrat section to be used for improving the article, since the company ended the character yesterday. Thanks. 2001:4455:699:AB00:BCC6:CFC7:E47E:AE4E (talk) 03:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sonic the Hedgehog (film series) (April 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OceanHok was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Officially declining this draft per WP:FILMSERIES and comments by IP editor and Indagate.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
OceanHok (talk) 18:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

DYK for The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild

On 16 April 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that none of the original core Ice Age cast returned for The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Ice Age Adventures of Buck Wild), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Image on Scrat Tales page

I’d assume that from Wikipedia’s Manuel of Style, it would be preferred to have the poster rather than the series’ logo. SlySabre (talk) 12:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

@ZX2006XZ:, I appreciate your good faith edits, however references listing fan sites as well as the toy manufacturers direct website are generally not considered reliable. For instance, the references that are already on the page are considered reliable (for the most part), which include BBC, ComicBook.com, Collider, Screen Rant, Vulture, Metro, etc. These are the type of sources that should be included, since these are considered secondary ones. What this means is that the website used by the company that directly created media tie-in merchandise for the series should not be included because it is considered a primary source. On Wikipedia, it is generally more acceptable to add secondary sources instead, which are independent sites that have already established notability and reliability. SlySabre (talk) 18:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)

Question

Can I add you to a list of WikiFriends on my profile? That is if you consider me one of course, if not I totally understand. Thanks for reading this. SlySabre (talk) 15:54, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

@SlySabre: Hey. Sorry I didn't answe earlier, but how exactly does this WikiFriends thing work? ZX2006XZ (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
@ZX2006XZ: It’s basically just a list of the users who I get along with most on Wikipedia and are on good terms/relations with. SlySabre (talk) 21:23, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Would you be ok with this? SlySabre (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
@SlySabre: Responding to your question, I'llhave to think about it. ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:51, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Alrighty, that’s fine, thank you for getting back with me. SlySabre (talk) 13:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Disney theatrical animated feature films

I'd like you to rethink undoing my changes to List of Disney theatrical animated feature films. First of all Miramax films are already spit, so there currently is more than one chat. Second, may of this films probably shouldn't even be on the list like Enchanted (film). Films that aren't really animated or don't have a significant amount of animations should be separated. This has been discussed in the talk section of that page but no action has been taken. Andcbii (talk) 15:45, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

To be clear, I did try putting the Miramax films with the rest of movies listed, but I kept getting flack about it. But in the case of the live-action/animated films, they do count (e.g., Enchanted and Mary Poppins Returns). ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:53, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
I agree that Miramax films shouldn’t be on the list of animated Disney movies but instead should be on the list of Walt Disney Studios films since Miramax was under the Walt Disney Studios at the time it was part of Disney. SlySabre (talk) 16:38, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
On the Talk page for the list everyone is opposed to these films being listed. Who is saying they have to be included? Andcbii (talk) 16:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Well, Miramax used to be owned by Disney, so the animated movies that Miramax distributed count as Disney movies. If removed, that's like removing the Touchstone Pictures animated movies from the list. ZX2006XZ (talk) 16:50, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Access dates

Hey, please update the access dates for references when you use updated information from them like you did with box office figures here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_DreamWorks_Animation_productions&diff=prev&oldid=1085259466#Box_office_grosses. This is so other people know when the figures were updated. Indagate (talk) 12:05, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Is that a suggestion? ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:09, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
It's per Template:Cite web documentation, "note that access-date is the date that the URL was found to be working and to support the text being cited". Please update the the access-date to todays date when you use a source. Indagate (talk) 12:34, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Okay. I'll keep that in mind. ZX2006XZ (talk) 12:44, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Thank you Indagate (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Don’t Know If You Heard

https://whatsondisneyplus.com/disney-junior-reportedly-developing-ice-age-babies-series-for-disney/ SlySabre (talk) 12:51, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Oh. I heard. ZX2006XZ (talk) 13:25, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers Teaser poster.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chip n Dale Rescue Rangers Teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Can we have a formal discussion here

You seem to have a bad reputation around here when it comes to edit warring and using reliable sources, by what this talk page indicates. You can't just add unsourced information onto a wikipedia page based on a hunch you had. Read the sources carefully before writing their contents into a page. The Logo you keep adding to Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2023 film) is not the actual film logo and was just used to encompass the whole franchise. Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg were not announced as producers on those Paramount + spin-off films. And most certainely nowhere has it been stated that Paramount Animation and Nickelodeon Movies are production companies on that 2023 film. Also going anomynous to make edits won't fool anyone. If you don't stop I WILL report you. Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 14:52, 02 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Warner Animation Group (2016).png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Warner Animation Group (2016).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

Help with a Template

I wanted to work on Draft:Template:Disney Television Animation, and wanted it to look something like this, but I can’t seem to format it any better: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Template:Disney_Television_Animation&oldid=1082944666

I decided it would probably be a good idea to separate the main shows from associated productions because some shows were produced by the studio but credited under a different label (ex: Jetix Animation Concepts; Super Robot Monkey Team Hyperforce Go!, Get Ed and Yin Yang Yo!) or some were uncredited (ex: Nightmare Ned and Clerks: The Animated Series). SlySabre (talk) 02:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

You know, you don't have to create a draft for a template, in the case of DTVA because of how many shows they have. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

But, the template looks pretty good. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:39, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@ZX2006XZ:, can you move the notes down below on Draft:Template:Disney Television Animation to something like Template:20th Century Fox Animation? I’ve tried and tried but I can’t seem to get it all the way down at the bottom. SlySabre (talk) 12:08, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey @SlySabre, that's done Indagate (talk) 12:14, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, that looks much better! @Indagate: do you think the template looks ready to be submitted yet? SlySabre (talk) 12:16, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Thanks, yeah think it's looks alright for mainspace Indagate (talk) 12:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
I think so too. I guess I’ll go ahead and submit it. SlySabre (talk) 12:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Nevermind, there’s several shows missing. Glad I noticed that, I’ll submit it when I’m finished adding all of the missing ones. SlySabre (talk) 12:35, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

Files listed for discussion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for discussion. Please see Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 March 22 if you are interested in preserving their usage.

Thank you. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of White Men Can't Jump (upcoming film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article White Men Can't Jump (upcoming film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White Men Can't Jump (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:23, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

For List of 20th Century Studios films

I have noticed that there is an edit war regarding a variant of the logo used on the page. For Wikipedia, it is preferred that users take the issue to the talk page instead of reverting each other’s edits back and forth. Thanks. SlySabre (talk) 16:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:04, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZX2006XZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What did I do specifically to be blocked? ZX2006XZ (talk) 15:12, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You should probably read the February 2022 section of this page, which lists multiple warnings you received. DonIago (talk) 16:30, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ZX2006XZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, I understand what I did wrong. I have no excuse for what I did at The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones on February 12, 2022, which was adding Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Releasing in the infobox without a source (by the way, I think I found a source for Screen Gems and Sony Pictures Releasing). If you unblock me, I will make sure that I find valuable sources for anything that I put in Wikipedia. ZX2006XZ (talk) 17:18, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Please read what's on your talk page, including the linked policies and guidelines. Unlike other websites, you're expected to actually read our rules. You seem to understand what the issue is, though, so I'm unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:25, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

You think you found a source? Where did you even find this information in the first place? OK, so what's your source? By the way, the key here is reliable sources, not valuable sources. If you get stuck while looking for sources, try checking WP:FILM/R. It has links to sources commonly cited in film articles, including several trade magazines. You can also search the archives of WP:RSN for discussions on individual sources to see what the community says about them. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:12, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

The source is the official trailer of The Mortal Instruments,posted by Sony Pictures Entertainment's YouTube channel. ZX2006XZ (talk) 21:35, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Here is the link, by the way.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc4CiTvQ-YE ZX2006XZ (talk) 01:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Please read through the links that I and others have posted on your talk page. A reliable source is something like a trade magazine that says "Screen Gems is a production company on The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones." For example: this review from The Hollywood Reporter. See how this source explicitly identifies the production companies? Quoting the source: "Production companies: Screen Gems, Constantin Film International, Unique Features". That is what you need to find and cite on Wikipedia. It doesn't matter if someone's logo flashes on the screen in a trailer on YouTube. That could mean anything – that they're a production company, a distributor, or maybe just contractually obligated to appear simply because they negotiated some deal. In this case, it seems that they are a production company. Other times, that guess will be wrong. We can't know for sure what deals these companies have with each other until a reliable source tells us. It's like looking at a photograph and saying, "This looks like it's a family photograph, so the oldest looking man is probably the father, the oldest looking woman is probably the mother, and everyone else is their children." Sometimes this will be correct. Other times, it will result in bizarrely wrong guesswork. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:16, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for the links. I really appreciate it. ZX2006XZ (talk) 02:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia, as you did to File:BlazingSamuraiPromotionalPoster.png, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:50, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove file deletion tags from file description pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at File:Scratte Ice Age.png, you may be blocked from editing. Edits of this type may be considered vandalism.The tag states clearly in bold "do not remove this notice from files you have uploaded." Whpq (talk) 13:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a file deletion tag from the description page of a Wikipedia file without resolving the problem that the tag refers to, as you did at File:Scratte Ice Age.png. Whpq (talk) 18:52, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prey (2022).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prey (2022).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20th Century Fox Home Entertainment (2010).svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20th Century Fox Home Entertainment (2010).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Paramount Animation

I’m not crazy in thinking the funky dude was lying about the information being unsourced, right? In bulk shifts like that it can be very hard to tell what was removed but everything in the before seemed pretty well sourced--CreecregofLife (talk) 06:06, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Rodrick Rules (2022) logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Diary of a Wimpy Kid, Rodrick Rules (2022) logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft:The Sea Beast (2022 film)

Hi, just to note that I've removed your request to move this page at WP:RM/TR, as that is not the correct venue for that request. The draft needs to go through the WP:AFC process, and as mentioned on the page it was previously submitted there and rejected. You'll need to follow the guidance mentioned at the top of the page Draft:The Sea Beast (2022 film), and also resolve any issues that caused it to fail last time. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:54, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sea Beast (2022 film) (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
If this film has had a limited release in theaters, please include review information and other reception information and resubmit. If the film has not yet been released, please resubmit when the film is released, with reception information.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 20:47, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Moving pages

If you move a page, it is your responsibility to fix any redirects. So please do it for Glass Onion. A person in Georgia (talk) 00:25, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Can you please stop editing things on Locksmith Animation and DNEG because I'm VERY FUCK UP!!

Lolololol LathanBarbinTheFanOfYoutube (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Don't Worry Darling Twitter Banner.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Don't Worry Darling Twitter Banner.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film title

This article just says the "next Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles". Doesn't give a title and I don't know why you are so insistent on adding one to the Wikipedia page. https://deadline.com/2022/06/paramount-tom-cruise-dungeons-and-dragons-teenage-mutant-ninja-turtles-babylon-transformers-cineeurope-1235049871/ Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Unblock an IP address

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ZX2006XZ (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "YOURMOMSBOY1234567". The reason given for YOURMOMSBOY1234567's block is: "Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information)."

Decline reason:

It appears that autoblock has expired. SQLQuery Me! 16:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Edit warring on TMNT film page

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Your images

Enough is enough; this is your final warning involving WP:COPYRIGHT-violating images, especially ones sourced to Logopedia, which gives us no indication where an image comes from, and restoring them to articles despite being told not to. You've been warned here and on Commons too many times, and this will stop. Take the time to source images properly. Nate • (chatter) 02:02, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Turner Feature Animation.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Turner Feature Animation.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Morning Report (song)

Information icon Hello, ZX2006XZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Morning Report (song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lyle Lyle Crocodile Movie Twitter Banner.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lyle Lyle Crocodile Movie Twitter Banner.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ice Age Scrat Tales.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ice Age Scrat Tales.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Menu Movie Logo.jpeg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Menu Movie Logo.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Prey (2022).jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Prey (2022).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:20th Century Fox Home Entertainment (2010).svg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:20th Century Fox Home Entertainment (2010).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:02, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features

Template:20th Century Studios theatrical animated features has been nominated for merging with Template:20th Century Animation. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 06:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:GFM Animation

Information icon Hello, ZX2006XZ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GFM Animation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cars on the Road.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cars on the Road.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: On the Come Up (film) has been accepted

On the Come Up (film), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bennv123 (talk) 20:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ZX2006XZ/Archive_3&oldid=1128299080"