User talk:Awkwafaba/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
El Tor
Hello. You seem to keep reverting my changes at El Tor. The page is currently asking for a taxobox. As taxoboxes currently stand there does not seem to be way of representing the taxobox as you wish to see it (presumably if you knew how to do it, you would be more positive in your editing and simply do it). Therefore I have added a taxobox that is not incorrect, i.e. a speciesbox representing the species that the strain discussed on the page is part of.
Please take a look at the following template:
The strains of E. coli represented in the template either do not have a taxobox, or have one at the species level. Please choose what you would like to see at El Tor and do that. I see you are busy in real life, so will give you a week or so, and then will put back the taxobox I put in previously. Thanks. YorkshireExpat (talk) 08:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @YorkshireExpat: taxoboxes should show the taxon discussed in the article, not the parent article. El Tor is not a species, Vibrio cholerae is a separate article. Look at Bacillus cereus biovar anthracis. Look at {{Subspeciesbox}} and {{infraspeciesbox}}. These templates are used on thousands of pages for varieties, strains, and other infraspecific taxa. For viruses, you can use {{virusbox}}. There is no reason to put the wrong taxon in the taxobox. If those strains of E. coli have a taxobox for the parent, they are wrong too. I would change it myself, but I don’t often get to use a desktop much, and putting in a full taxobox is difficult on a tablet, so I use the {{missing-taxobox}} template and pass the buck. Thanks for sticking with this, though. I appreciate your work on all these taxa articles. Cheers. --awkwafaba (📥) 12:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Awkwafaba: Thanks for this. However, I'm not sure there is a good solution in here. Bacillus cereus biovar anthracis uses a manual taxobox using the 'varietas' parameter, where for El Tor what you need is 'serotype' and 'strain'. Also, I much prefer using automatic taxobox types. {{infraspeciesbox}} is for botanical taxa, and {{Subspeciesbox}} only goes to subspecies level (I'll admit to not fully understanding the links between subspecies, strain and serotype). {{virusbox}} is clearly for viruses. Maybe we need a bacteriabox @Peter coxhead:? YorkshireExpat (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @YorkshireExpat: what would the last few lines of such a taxobox look like? Like this?
- @Awkwafaba: Thanks for this. However, I'm not sure there is a good solution in here. Bacillus cereus biovar anthracis uses a manual taxobox using the 'varietas' parameter, where for El Tor what you need is 'serotype' and 'strain'. Also, I much prefer using automatic taxobox types. {{infraspeciesbox}} is for botanical taxa, and {{Subspeciesbox}} only goes to subspecies level (I'll admit to not fully understanding the links between subspecies, strain and serotype). {{virusbox}} is clearly for viruses. Maybe we need a bacteriabox @Peter coxhead:? YorkshireExpat (talk) 14:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
| ... | ... |
| Species: | Vibrio cholerae |
| Strain: | V. cholerae El Tor |
- With, I asume, no equivalent of the trinomial box you get with a subspecies or variety. Should there be a line for the serotype as well? Peter coxhead (talk) 15:24, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- See also, as another example, the taxobox at Cantaloupe. Would it be like this, with "serotype" instead of "subspecies" and "strain" instead of "variety", but with the values not italicized? Peter coxhead (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: Or from a quick read on the subject maybe serogroup would be better than serotype.
| ... | ... |
| Species: | Vibrio cholerae |
| Serogroup: | O1 |
| Strain: | V. cholerae El Tor |
- Maybe there's somewhere better to have this conversation where people who know what they're on about could see it? YorkshireExpat (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- WP:WikiProject Microbiology? Peter coxhead (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- TOL or Automated taxobox system probably have more watchers than Microbiology. There are manual taxoboxes I haven't tackled because they use ranks that aren't supported by automatic taxoboxes. Forma and forma specialis are defined by ICNafp. There are several infrasubspecific ranks defined in the ICNP; see pages 91-92 of this PDF; the ranks are given as connecting terms, so {{Infraspeciesbox}} would be the appropriate template to add support for further ranks.Plantdrew (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely {{Infraspeciesbox}}. Rather than keep adding extra named ranks, I was wondering about adding a couple of lowest level ranks for which the name of the rank could be specified, something like
|extra_rank1_name=RANK_NAME+|extra_rank1=TAXON_NAME. Just a thought at present. (Italicization or not would be an issue.) Peter coxhead (talk) 18:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)- These ranks keep popping up. I thought I found them all with all the work I did on Category:Infraspecific virus taxa ( 83 ) and then I discovered biovar and that's how I found El Tor. In some places it is Vibrio cholrae bv. eltor. These informal ranks are rather unruly, and I feel a little ego-driven ("This bacteria I discovered is not a mere strain! It is a biovar."). I don't know what the other taxonomic codes say on these ranks, but ICTV refuses to even comment on anything below species. Until they do, I feel we're going to keep getting new ranks under species. --awkwafaba (📥) 20:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Peter, I think parameters that allow free text are probably the best approach (rather than hard coding several ranks that might only be used in a handful of articles across Wikipeda). Italicization can be applied with standard wiki markup when necessary. Basically the same solution as using
|binomial_text=in Automatic taxobox to deal with miscellaneous weird cases. Plantdrew (talk) 22:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)- @Plantdrew: yes, I agree that some kind of free text approach is the best. Some parts of the code of the taxobox system (automated and manual) are hard to understand and maintain because they deal with unusual and little used 'ranks' or other conventions (like the use of double quotes) which actually more difficult to implement than standard cases. I'll post something at Template talk:Infraspeciesbox, I think, and we can advertise it elsewhere if it develops. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:37, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Peter, I think parameters that allow free text are probably the best approach (rather than hard coding several ranks that might only be used in a handful of articles across Wikipeda). Italicization can be applied with standard wiki markup when necessary. Basically the same solution as using
- These ranks keep popping up. I thought I found them all with all the work I did on Category:Infraspecific virus taxa ( 83 ) and then I discovered biovar and that's how I found El Tor. In some places it is Vibrio cholrae bv. eltor. These informal ranks are rather unruly, and I feel a little ego-driven ("This bacteria I discovered is not a mere strain! It is a biovar."). I don't know what the other taxonomic codes say on these ranks, but ICTV refuses to even comment on anything below species. Until they do, I feel we're going to keep getting new ranks under species. --awkwafaba (📥) 20:54, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, definitely {{Infraspeciesbox}}. Rather than keep adding extra named ranks, I was wondering about adding a couple of lowest level ranks for which the name of the rank could be specified, something like
- TOL or Automated taxobox system probably have more watchers than Microbiology. There are manual taxoboxes I haven't tackled because they use ranks that aren't supported by automatic taxoboxes. Forma and forma specialis are defined by ICNafp. There are several infrasubspecific ranks defined in the ICNP; see pages 91-92 of this PDF; the ranks are given as connecting terms, so {{Infraspeciesbox}} would be the appropriate template to add support for further ranks.Plantdrew (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- WP:WikiProject Microbiology? Peter coxhead (talk) 18:04, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Maybe there's somewhere better to have this conversation where people who know what they're on about could see it? YorkshireExpat (talk) 15:52, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
@Awkwafaba, YorkshireExpat, and Plantdrew: please see Template talk:Infraspeciesbox#Further infraspecific ranks. Is the proposal clear/complete? I'd like to check this before advertising the thread more widely. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:25, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Peter coxhead: All looks good thanks. Shall monitor! YorkshireExpat (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 43, 2021)
 The Portland Building (1982) in Portland, Oregon by architect Michael Graves is an example of Postmodern architecture.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Personality • Fish sauce Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phaeochrous, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carena. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Synonyms and taxonbars
Hello Awkwafaba,
Thank you again for fixing the incorrect taxonbar I added to Daviesia brachyphylla.
With respect to adding taxonbar entries for synonyms to plant articles as you have done to the D. brachyphylla article, I have three questions for you to consider -
- 1. Plants of the World Online lists 78 synonyms for Dendrobium, 70 of which have Wikidata entries (the other 8 could easily be added), 33 for Solanum and 109 for Eclipta prostrata. Do you think taxonbars should be added to these articles for all these synonyms?
- 2. How does adding taxonbars for synonyms add to the value of the article?
- 3. In your edit summary, you added "Either way this is consensus". Can you describe where the issue was discussed and consensus reached? (I read the taxonbar template, but can't find a requirement that Wikidata IDs for synonyms must be added to articles.) Gderrin (talk) 22:52, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Gderrin: you can check the archives at Template talk:Taxonbar, but perhaps this discussion would be best had there. As for my quick answers, for 1 it autocollapses. For 2, it adds the same value as for the accepted name, and if someone is more familiar with a different name they can easily click on more information on the name change. --awkwafaba (📥) 01:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- There certainly isn't consensus to add taxonbar entries for EVERY synonym. Daviesia incrassata var. brachyphylla is the only synonym of Daviesia brachyphylla given in POWO, and TPL accepts the taxon as a variety. The names are homotypic; via reference to the type, they encompass the exact same assemblage of living plants growing in the world, but differ in whether this assemblage is best understood as a species or variety. Having two taxonbar entries (one the only synonym) at Daviesia brachyphylla is helpful. While I'm thinking of it, I do want to note that some taxonbar links are much more valuable than others; for Australian plants, Florabase gives quite a bit of content, but APNI has little. Flora of China and Flora of North America taxonbar links are information rich, IPNI not so much. (Not to discount what APNI/IPNI do, but...). Additional taxonbar entries should absolutely be included when another Wikidata item holds the link to an information rich source. But this really should be discussed further in a broader venue. Plantdrew (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's worth noting that most of the taxon name items in Wikidata (not taxon items whatever is claimed over there) have been added by bots, not knowledgeable editors, who would probably have considered whether a synonym had been used sufficiently often to be notable. So I'm definitely against blindly adding a synonym to the taxonbar just because there's a Wikidata item. (As an aside, Wikidata's inability or unwillingness to properly distinguish taxa from taxon names may have encouraged smaller wikis, e.g. viwiki, to create separate articles for synonymous names with Wikidata entries, which is a separate but related issue because clicking on the Wikidata link in the taxonbar entry will show these redundant articles.) Peter coxhead (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- There certainly isn't consensus to add taxonbar entries for EVERY synonym. Daviesia incrassata var. brachyphylla is the only synonym of Daviesia brachyphylla given in POWO, and TPL accepts the taxon as a variety. The names are homotypic; via reference to the type, they encompass the exact same assemblage of living plants growing in the world, but differ in whether this assemblage is best understood as a species or variety. Having two taxonbar entries (one the only synonym) at Daviesia brachyphylla is helpful. While I'm thinking of it, I do want to note that some taxonbar links are much more valuable than others; for Australian plants, Florabase gives quite a bit of content, but APNI has little. Flora of China and Flora of North America taxonbar links are information rich, IPNI not so much. (Not to discount what APNI/IPNI do, but...). Additional taxonbar entries should absolutely be included when another Wikidata item holds the link to an information rich source. But this really should be discussed further in a broader venue. Plantdrew (talk) 03:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Gderrin: you can check the archives at Template talk:Taxonbar, but perhaps this discussion would be best had there. As for my quick answers, for 1 it autocollapses. For 2, it adds the same value as for the accepted name, and if someone is more familiar with a different name they can easily click on more information on the name change. --awkwafaba (📥) 01:58, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Untagged articles
I've been working through the taxobox articles without WikiProject banners. Everything that's left now has some issue(s) I want to resolve before tagging. For the most part, it's monotypy, where I want to add taxonbar from parameters, and make sure redirects exist and are categorized. There are a few that are also at the wrong title. There are a handful of other issues; the ones that come to mind immediately are: Robertdollfusidae and Robertdollfusiidae need to be merged, and Rhamphina needs to be disambiguated and new taxonomy template needs to be created. I'll get to them all in the next few days.
There may be some newly created articles showing up in the search for untagged articles; everything I'm wanting to work on further starts with the letters C, P or R, and none of them are binomials.
I'm not planning on tagging drafts at the moment, if you want to work on those. Plantdrew (talk) 18:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Plantdrew: i noticed you were making quick progress and realized i should be helping more. But i’ll hold back on the ones in CPR mainspace now. Just lmk when you want me back in the china shop :) --awkwafaba (📥) 00:58, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 44, 2021)
 Isabel Adrian is a Swedish television personality, producer, author and model. Pictured is Adrian in 2013.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Postmodernism • Personality Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 45, 2021)
 Hang gliding is an example of an air sport.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Isabel Adrian • Postmodernism Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:43, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 46, 2021)
 Dettifoss, located in northeast Iceland, is the largest waterfall in Europe in terms of volume discharge, with an average water flow of 200 m3/s.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Air sports • Isabel Adrian Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 47, 2021)
 Wholesaling or distributing is the sale of goods or merchandise to retailers; to industrial, commercial, institutional or other professional business users; or to other wholesalers (wholesale businesses) and related subordinated services. Pictured is the Birmingham Wholesale Markets at 4:00 AM.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Geography of Iceland • Air sports Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 22 November 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:30, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 48, 2021)
 Proposed Lazarev Sea name (at top-middle of image) as part of the Southern Ocean
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Wholesaling • Geography of Iceland Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 29 November 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Transposable element
Hello Awkwafaba. I strongly apologise to bother you, but if you do not mind, I would like to ask a question regarding the article Transposable element. I believe it should include some information on the so-called Class III TEs. The 'draft' I created: Some scientists also distinguish a third category of transposable elements. Class III TEs have been described as "a grab-bag consisting of transposons that don't clearly fit into the other two categories". Examples include Foldback (FB) elements, TU elements, and Miniature Inverted-repeat Transposable Elements.
References: Capy P (1998). Dynamics and evolution of transposable elements. New York: Chapman & Hall. ISBN 978-3-540-61190-5 (definition of Class III elements + examples); Boutanaev AM, Osbourn AE (July 2018). "Multigenome analysis implicates miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) in metabolic diversification in eudicots". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (28): E6650–E6658. doi:10.1073/pnas.1721318115. PMC 6048515. PMID 29941591 (MITEs as Class III TEs); Kaminker JS, Bergman CM, Kronmiller B, Carlson J, Svirskas R, Patel S, Frise E, Wheeler DA, Lewis SE, Rubin GM, Ashburner M, Celniker SE (2002). "The transposable elements of the Drosophila melanogaster euchromatin: a genomics perspective". Genome Biology. 3 (12): RESEARCH0084. doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0084. PMC 151186. PMID 12537573 ("Foldback (FB) elements, which are characterized by their property of reannealing after denaturation with zero-order kinetics, are quite distinct from prototypical class I or II elements…"); Baez J (2005). "Subcellular Life Forms" (PDF) (review of P. Capy's scientific book + examples). Could you add it to the Wikipedia article re. transposable elements (TEs), please? However, I am not sure where exactly, and perhaps the text needs some copy edits and other minor fixes. If necessary, please feel free to make further changes, additions and adjustments. Thanks a lot! :-) Kind regards, --Pinoczet (talk) 22:00, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Pinoczet: I’m afraid I’m not very current on the topic, but that source seems like it would be reliable. Perhaps you should join the conversation at Talk:Transposable element#Class III? --awkwafaba (📥) 02:19, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Hello, Awkwafaba,
When you move an article to Draft space, could you tag the original page for speedy deletion, CSD R2? It just makes things a bit easier for admins patrolling speedy deletion categories. Thank you! Liz Read! Talk! 01:21, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: i tried to move Opuntia setispina Engelmann to Opuntia setispina, but that existed already. I did not realize it was a redirect, so I assumed it a duplicate and moved it to Draft. I cannot delete pages, so at that point I could move it no further. --awkwafaba (📥) 03:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 49, 2021)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Lazarev Sea • Wholesaling Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 6 December 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:34, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 50, 2021)
 People experiencing an adventure (close-up view)
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Bird food • Lazarev Sea Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 13 December 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 51, 2021)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Adventure • Bird food Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 20 December 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:45, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Template:WikiProject Animals in media/class has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Q28 (talk) 05:34, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2021)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Goat meat • Adventure Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2022)
 A man playing the didgeridoo, an indigenous instrument of Australia that was developed at least 1,500 years ago. This is one of the myriad topics within the history of music.
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Carapace • Goat meat Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 3 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Happy First Edit Day!
Have a very happy first edit anniversary!
From the Birthday Committee, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:31, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Aww, thanks @CAPTAIN RAJU: and the Birthday Committee! --awkwafaba (📥) 02:28, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2022)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: History of music • Carapace Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 10 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
"Canis wikilupus" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Canis wikilupus and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 11#Canis wikilupus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Thryduulf (talk) 16:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2022)
 A NeXTstation graphics workstation from 1990
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Reader Rabbit • History of music Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 17 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2022)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Workstation • Reader Rabbit Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2022)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Television ratings • Workstation Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 31 January 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|
Liking your user name choice
A mixture of a rapper/actress and a most curious chickpea byproduct. Awesome! Honestly, wish I thought of it first! Steel1943 (talk) 20:41, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Steel1943: thanks. It took me a while to think it up. I keep misspelling aquafaba now, though.--awkwafaba (📥) 02:54, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:10, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2022)
Hello, Awkwafaba. The article for improvement of the week is:
Please be bold and help improve it! Previous selections: Social equality • Television ratings Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:05, 7 February 2022 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • |
|---|