Talk:Tia Mowry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

is there any point having one page for tia and one for tamera when they say virtually the same thing?

I understand Tia and Tamera Mowry are identical twins, but their pages have exactly the same photo up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dano112358 (talk • contribs) 04:57, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Birthplace confusion[edit]

This article says the twins were born in San Diego, California, but the Tamera Mowry article and the reference here claim they were born in West Germany. ... discospinster talk 20:16, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tia & Tamera Page?[edit]

I think that Tia & Tamera should have a page for work they have done together. The Olsen twins have one, but also have separate pages for their individual work. Why isn't there a "Tia AND Tamera" page?Olsentwinluv4ever (talk) 16:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?[edit]

108.198.9.140 (talk) 16:04, 1 January 2013 (UTC)missing.] Zell Faze (talk) 22:48, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tia Mowry.jpg Nominated for Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Tia Mowry.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Media without a source as of 30 June 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:25, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tia Mowry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:59, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tia Mowry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 06:28, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tia Mowry → Tia Mowry-Hardrict – I would like more opinions on this one. Subject has been substantially credited by, and has been referred to in sourcing, by her married name since at least 2011 – e.g. EW in early 2011, Variety in 2013. However, I also notice a trend in the last year or two for secondary sourcing to refer to subject as simply "Tia Mowry" again, and the recent Netflix announcement for their new TV series Family Reunion – [1] – also is just "Tia Mowry". So I can't tell if this is a WP:NAMECHANGES situation or not. So this RM is to gauge wider consensus on the issue... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 03:41, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. Because she and her sister are identical twins and often work together, they are often referred to collectively as "Tia and Tamera Mowry", which I think is why they tend to still be credited by their maiden names. Rreagan007 (talk) 07:08, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, her maiden name is still more common and recognizable in the long-term of her career. WikiRedactor (talk) 15:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support WP:NAMECHANGES is compelling applies in this situation. She is mostly credited with her new name, uses it and is referred to it in reliable sources. It has been long enough to look stable. Also listed that way on IMDb. We should give significant weight to how a person refers to themselves. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:26, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • I will say that this one is not nearly so clear-cut as the situation with sister Tamera – Tia is actually not consistently credited by her married name, esp. recently. That's why I'm actually ambivalent with this proposed WP:RM. I think arguments can be made either way, but the stronger arguments are probably on the side of not moving it... --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      • Not as clear but I still think WP:NAMECHANGES supports the move although recent credits in old name weakens that. See what others say. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - The current name is also commonly used, especially by major, mainstream news media and some books. If WP:NAMECHANGES isn't clear enough, how about WP:DIVIDEDUSE, which says to use the least, if not less, surprising, more familiar name, i.e. "Tia Mowry", or WP:MAIDEN? George Ho (talk) 01:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC); edited, 02:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.


Complete list of books[edit]

Reportedly, Tia Mowry tried being vegan - albeit 'for a short while' - because she felt better. During this time, she authored a book on the topic:

Deleted Information[edit]

Someone deleted all of the photo/bio information. 73.79.241.235 (talk) 01:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Tia_Mowry&oldid=1209226653"