Talk:Parc Jae-jung

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 10 July 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved (and deleting disambiguation page as no longer needed) -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:51, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


– Per WP:COMMONNAME, article titles should reflect the most recognizable variant of a name as established by English-language reliable sources. Sources that use "Parc Jae-jung" (or "Parc Jae Jung"): The Korea Times [1], MTV Asia [2], Christian Today [3]. Instances of "Park Jae-jung" refer to the actor of the same name, as in this article by The Korea Times. If Romanized, this use of "Parc" is also implemented on cover art [4], and English-language stores list the singer as "Parc" (Spotify, iTunes, Amazon). A hatnote can atop the singer's article and the actor's article can suffice per WP:SMALLDETAILS. The disambiguation page can be nominated for deletion following the page moves per WP:2DABS. ƏXPLICIT 07:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose 1st stylism, Strong oppose 2nd completely wrong - if singer moves singer doesn't cease to exist. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@In ictu oculi: Where is this stylization you speak of? This is no different from Talk:Oh Se-hun#Requested move 25 March 2019, which you supported. ƏXPLICIT 01:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Parc for Park is a stylism. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:19, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No it isn't. Ke$ha is a stylism. P!nk is a stylism. This is merely the preferred spelling of the subject's romanised name. PC78 (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@In ictu oculi: It is simply how the subject has decided to Romanize his name, in the same way others have decided to Romanize the character (박) differently, like Pak Se-ri and Bahk Jong-sun. These are also not "stylisms". ƏXPLICIT 03:56, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support both and delete the dab page. The first appears to be a WP:COMMONNAME and with only one other usage the parenthical and the dab page are therefore redundant. Use hatnotes instead. PC78 (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    • Also per WP:NC-KO: names should generally be romanized according to their common usage in English sources. PC78 (talk) 17:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.