Talk:Minsk Tractor Works

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Agriculture Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Commonwealth of Independent States#Member states|CIS countries]] Anchor Commonwealth of Independent States#Member states links to a specific web page: Member states. The anchor (#Member states) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Recent edits that aren't appropriate[edit]

Whilst incorporating a Wiki link to a list of the CIS countries, I was dismayed to discover that a bunch of relevant details in this entry have been deleted recently for no good reason by 2603:7000:2143:8500:2432:bae0:294f:5869. I suspect this anonymous editor may have a concern that’s not appropriate to justify the many deletions of contributions by earlier editors.

Let me explain a bit of my background. I grew up on a tobacco farm in Southern Maryland USA, where relatively modest tractors, and often older models, are used in the smaller-scale agriculture performed there. I was enlightened to read about the Minsk Tractor Works — and I recall seeing at least one example of the Minsk production in Maryland years ago that was associated with the USDA’s Henry A. Wallace Beltsville Agricultural Research Center (I don’t recall all the specifics; this was nearly half-a-century ago). Note I myself have plowed many acres of Maryland soil atop a Detroit-produced, 1951 Ferguson TO-20 with a Continental engine.

This Ferguson model is fairly similar to the contemporary Minsk MTZ-1 & MTZ-2; notably, the Minsk products also incorporated Harry Ferguson’s pioneering design of the hydraulic three-point hitch, which was not common among tractors of the time other than those made by Ferguson & Ford. Yet this technology has since become universal among agricultural tractors -- and the Minsk production helped make Ferguson’s design common in the Soviet bloc early on. Subsequently, Minsk's products, along with those of Ford & the merged Massey-Ferguson, helped induce the adoption of this safety-inspired, major agricultural innovation as the worldwide standard.

As an example of an inappropriate edit by 2603:7000:2143:8500:2432:bae0:294f:5869 — one thing that’s fairly important to most "farm boys" is the distinctive color that identifies the particular brand of tractor, e.g., "Persian Orange" for Allis-Chalmers, or "John Deere Green", or International "Harvester Red". In my own experience, many of the US-produced Ferguson tractors were red in color, while the UK production was alway grey. Yet one of the many details deleted by the editor above is the following, "The most popular exported model was the MTZ-50 (52). There were no major differences between the exported ones and not exported ones, except that the exported tractors were painted red."

Unless other editors advise otherwise, I will reverse a number of these inappropriate edits shortly. Theophilus Reed (talk) 02:16, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]