Talk:Mercury spacesuit

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Early posts[edit]

The photo shown at the top of this page & labeled "Mercury vacuum suit" is instead an early & aluminized version of the Gemini suit.69.252.244.195 19:00, 9 April 2007 (UTC)Seth Colby[reply]

The National Geographic picture (or similar picture in the public domain) of Malcolm Ross & Victor Prather sitting in the Strato-Lab High-V gondola before their 1961 balloon flight would show them bundled in the Mark IV suit without modifications applied by NASA for the Mercury flights.Catrachos (talk) 14:50, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have my own picture but I'm not sure what it was used on. [1]--Craigboy (talk) 11:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay do to the lack of activity on this page I'll probably go ahead and add this picture to the article 1 --Craigboy (talk) 06:08, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll search around and try to find some pictures of the suit while it was being used on the stratolab project. --Craigboy (talk) 22:55, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Navy Mark V[edit]

Is "Navy Mark V" supposed to redirect here? It was my understanding that they are not the same suits. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.165.95.77 (talk) 01:17, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a mistake left over from the original creation of this page, which apparently was created as "Mark V" and then moved to "Mark IV". Page moves will automatically create these redirects. It should be removed to eliminate confusion. JustinTime55 (talk) 21:07, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed name change[edit]

I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been discussed before, but how does this topic rate an exemption from the WP:COMMONNAME policy? Most people have absolutely no idea what a "Navy Mark IV" was, compared to the multitudes who have heard of the Mercury space suit. This is analogous to Gemini space suit as opposed to "Clark G3C". There is no NPOV issue with the common name; I can only assume it's this way from benign neglect, as I can see no logical argument based on the policy.

The only issue might be technical; currently "Mercury space suit" redirects to Navy Mark IV, but it should be the other way around. What is the correct way to handle this situation (to preserve the edit history)? JustinTime55 (talk) 20:45, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Info[edit]

U.S. Spacesuit Development and Qualification for Project Mercury - Lots of good info.--Craigboy (talk) 23:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Navy Mark IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Navy Mark IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Navy Mark IV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:07, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neck dam[edit]

Was a neck dam used on the earliest suits, as seems likely if they were used by Navy pilots? Please ping with reply. · · · Peter Southwood (talk): 10:12, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mercury_spacesuit&oldid=1216385803"