Talk:Firewalker (The X-Files)

Firewalker (The X-Files) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Firewalker (The X-Files) is part of the The X-Files (season 2) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 14, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
October 3, 2012	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Television: Episode coverage / The X-Files

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the X-Files task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[History of robots#1991 to 2000|Project Dante]] The anchor (#1991 to 2000) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Firewalker (The X-Files)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gen. Quon (talk · contribs) 03:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
In the lead, there is no mention of production. I would add some thing.

Cite where you got the guest star information from.

Did The A.V. Club give the episode a grade? If so, what was it?
"The Rest" (as opposed to Bad or Essential). Don't know if it can be included. igordebraga ≠ 02:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The picture in the production section says "Howard Gordon was inspired by a NASA exploration project and Heart of Darkness." but his quote/paragraph gives the effect that he was alluding to Heart of Darkness, not directly inspired by it.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

On hold for seven days to straighten out issues.--Gen. Quon (talk) 20:10, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see User:Igordebraga made several of the suggested changes, thanks. I've tweaked the caption and alt text a little. Dunno if the AVC grade makes sense to add, as it only really works in context and adds nothing beyond defining the episode as "mediocre", which has already been explained through quotation. Thanks for taking the time to look at this one. GRAPPLE X 02:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, looks good! I pass! Congrats.--Gen. Quon (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]