Talk:Burning Lights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Critical reception edit?[edit]

It seems like 90% or more of the critics like this album. Only Jesus Freak Hideout didn't so far (but still they rated it 3/5). Would it be fair to say that it has received "positive reviews" versus "mostly positive reviews" since the vast majority liked it? (Heck, even 3/5 isn't bad if that's the lowest!) I also feel the Jesus Freak Hideout part in the critical reception section is too long. We should shorten it.

I wanted to do this, but wanted thoughts first. Srsrox (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Positive reviews is fine. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah figured as much. I don't think one critical website should change the wording that easily. Too many outweigh their somewhat negative reviews. Changed the section. Srsrox (talk) 19:22, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Credits[edit]

There is valuable information in the credits section that is of interest. It includes other artists with their own pages. It is better to add a reference than to remove the whole section. Al Leluia81 (talk) 20:19, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]