User talk:Non-dropframe/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

Thought you might want to see this Diff.

I saw this and it looks like the IP Editor is calling you out. Thought you might get a kick out of it or at least want to be informed of it. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 20:57, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Haha oh the whining... thanks for the heads up, Cameron --Non-Dropframe talk 21:05, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
No problem, I saw it and started cracking up, then he adds me into the mix oh gosh. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 21:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

X-Pac's personal life

X-Pac's life mentions when he tried to hang himself and that Juvi Guerrera did an interview without asking and elaborated on X-Pac hanging himself. Konnan mentioned in an interview shoot that Alicia web lost custody of her son because the dad showed juvi's interview to a judge. X-Pac was pissed and put defecation in his bag as revenge I don't know how to cite by the number links but I posted the link in the summary explanation. here is the link at 2:15 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8L0iLKq9q4 --96.254.48.155 (talk) 20:56, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi there, 96.254.48.155. Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons in regards to what types of things need to be sourced and Wikipedia:Citing sources to learn how to cite sources. --Non-Dropframe talk 21:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Jodense Valenciano

The guy already had a level 4 warning on Jodense Valenciano, so there was no need to go down to level 1 right after that. Wgolf (talk) 23:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Wgolf Ya, that was Huggle's error. Turned out he was already reported so I didn't bother changing it. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:35, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Can we talk about Huggle?

I’m reaching out to you because our logs tell us you’re a highly active Huggle user (top 20, actually). The Wikimedia Collaboration Team is researching a project that we hope will be useful to people who use Huggle and others engaged in edit-review and anti-vandalism. Using artificial intelligence programming (in ORES) and other means, we believe we can create feeds of Recent Changes that are better tailored to the type of work you do, helping you to be more effective and efficient. (The technology will have other benefits as well, which we can talk about.)

We're in the early stages of planning this and want to speak with people like yourself to better understand your work, goals and issues. If you’re interested in helping, I’d like to set up a time to meet by video conference, so that you can explain and demonstrate (via screensharing) some of your workflows, and we can ask and answer any questions.

To participate, please email the following information to me, jmatazzoni@wikimedia.org, or send it to designresearch@wikimedia.org:

  • Username
  • city/time zone
  • Best time to talk to you?
  • Email where we can reach you
  • Please use the subject line: Huggle User Conversations

Thanks! JMatazzoni (WMF) (talk) 19:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:48, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Good work! Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ (talk) 23:17, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:International Drone Racing Association logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:International Drone Racing Association logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

ANI discussion

There is a topic in which you were involved being discussed at WP:ANI. The topic is concern over Adam9007's removal of speedy deletion templates. You are welcome to join the discussion here. Toddst1 (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2016 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Non-dropframe,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Non-dropframe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Woody Allen

Hi, I'm Taichi, a sysop from Spanish Wikipedia. We have problems about this article, because a group of Spanish trolls from Twitter vandalized first the Spanish article (now semiprotected) but now vandalize the English version. It's neccesary a sysop help. Thanks. --Taichi (talk) 03:08, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Restoring deleted pages to draft/sandbox

Hi non-dropframe can you please help to restore the 2 pages you deleted please? I would like to continue to work on them as a draft so that they meet wikipedia's guidelines. thank you! Bpc.sg (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Bpc.sg. Unfortunately, only an admin can view deleted pages and I'm not one. However, if you make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion (be sure to follow the instructions), an admin will review your request and may be able to assist you. If there's anything further I can help you with, please let me know! --Non-Dropframe talk 13:09, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Waco Claim

I hope this is the right way to leave a message, your ui is very confusing, you might want to create a user-friendly ui. Now to your question of documentation of my changes to the article WACO, a new revelation. I added one major conclusion of that movie, namely the fact that Hillary Clinton did order the extrajudicial execution of the remaining WACO inhabitants, men women and children. I thought about that myself and tried to add a youtube link but found it very difficult, again the ui. I then decided that it was unnecessary as the documentary the article is about, is my source of information. I was referring to the documentary itself. So your temporary removal should be an error. Please restore my addition. Thank you.

92.220.180.61 Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. To learn more about adding sources, please take a look at WP:SOURCES anf Help:Referencing for beginners. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to reply here. --Non-Dropframe talk 21:52, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Robert Skotak

Здравствуйте! Robert Skotak известный специалист в киноиндустрии https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeKpMTrnOv8. DENAMAX (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi DENAMAX, the reason I tagged the page for deletion is because it doesn't seem to meet the General Notability Guidelines and, per WP:G7, no specific claims of significance are made. I'd highly suggest you'd familiarize yourself with this page. Please don't take the deletion personally, I'm sure your efforts are in good faith. But there are guidelines regarding inclusion in the encyclopedia. If I can be of any assistance, please let me know. --Non-Dropframe talk 15:49, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
Как можно спасти статью? Вот источники https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Robert+Skotak https://news.yandex.ru/yandsearch?text=Robert%20Skotak&rpt=nnews2&grhow=clutop. DENAMAX (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
http://www.hollywood.com/celebrities/robert-skotak-58926214/ http://www.theterminatorfans.com/category/crew/robert-skotak/ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xdnK8wqeIk http://www.theterminatorfans.com/harbinger-down/ https://www.google.com.ua/#q=Robert+Skotak&tbm=nws DENAMAX (talk) 15:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)


Hi I just wanted to add a few episodes to the Riverdale page that's why i made the edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.92.58.145 (talk) 02:34, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

References

Ref are CO maj Gen shortis I had the email tonight from the old comrades and the battalion HQ,

Hi, Jason7197. Unfortunately, a reference needs to be a verifiable published source (see Wikipedia:Citing sources). This is particularly important for biographies concerning living or recently deceased people. Don't get me wrong, I'm certain your addition is true and was made in good faith, I'm simply enforcing Wikipedia policy. If I can be of further assistance, please let me know. My deepest sympathies regarding the loss of the Major General. --Non-Dropframe talk 01:25, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

I bet you are a h0m0sexual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.164.228.39 (talk) 03:28, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Don't delete or edit my post on Shan Ju Lin

G'day don't even think about removing my edit to Shan Ju Lin. It is not meant to be constructive so how dare you. It is truth and it is fact so leave it the hell alone or are you a hater and homophobic too? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.22.234.124 (talk) 06:04, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

rooster graphics

Thank you, I thought it's rooster graphics.
178.42.213.99 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:32, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

RfA

You know you'd probably pass if you had just a wee bit more content creation work?--v/r - TP 01:51, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

TParis, that's a very kind and encouraging thing of you to say and I'll certainly take it to heart. Honestly, my passions lie in anti-vandalism and the like; I can't really say that I find content creation particularly enjoyable...I prefer to protect the work of those who are good at it. But like I said, your comment is very encouraging and perhaps I'll put on my writing...hat? and give it a go. Thanks! --Non-Dropframe talk 19:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hood_Meow

I made a change about the Mig-15 source, as the its showed a misconception of MIG series copying Ta183, was actually wrong. The influence of design for mig15 should be from LA-160/ LA-150, as these nose-airintake jets were built and tested before the capture of Ta183's blue print, and secondly the germans had greatly misunderstood the theory of delta wings/swept wings, which should not apply the idea of "German revolutionised the aircraft history", and further assuming it affected the post war jets, like the MIG and F86. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hood Meow (talk • contribs) 19:52, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hood Meow, I appreciate your contributions and have no doubt that your knowledge of the MIG easily outweighs mine. My concern, as referenced in the note I left you, is that you deleted a fairly good chunk of referenced content without explaining why in your edit summary. Users like me whose main focus is combating vandalism rely heavily on edit summaries in figuring out if an edit is useful. Please feel free to restore your edit but ensure you use the edit summary in order to avoid having the content removal mistaken for vandalism. Thanks and if I can be of any further help, please let me know! --Non-Dropframe talk 19:58, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

I understand now, i will be remember to add edit summery in further edition in any post, thankyou for reminder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hood Meow (talk • contribs) 20:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I edited the Bastyr University page because of the libelous content recently added. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.83.197.115 (talk) 00:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Keep running into you on Huggle today. Nice work! GorillaWarfare (talk) 22:09, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
Hey, GorillaWarfare, thanks so much! Nice work to you as well! --Non-Dropframe talk 22:21, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

PearlJam101

LA WEEKLY published article and review. Thank you wiki police. I'm still learning how to add source links and citation markers.

Hey, PearlJam101, Wikipedia has lots of great resources to help new editors. Please take a look at WP:SOURCES and Help:Referencing for beginners. If I can be of further assistance, please feel free to reply here! --Non-Dropframe talk 22:57, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Removal of Flood Re edit.

I'm not sure what was wrong with it? We are up against a whole system here which is committed to profit and preservation of shareholder value. It pays them to be bland and neutral because this is their stock in trade and helps them to be economical with the truth. It is the job of those who notice what is going on to try and wake up those who are being robbed while they sleep, and by their own government too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cyril87 (talk • contribs) 13:00, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Cyril87, unfortunately, I had to revert your edit because Wikipedia is not a soapbox. I don't doubt your earnest desire to inform people about a topic that is important to you. However, content on Wikipedia needs to be kept to neutral facts. If I can be of any further help, please let me know. --Non-Dropframe talk 18:24, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

75.155.59.190

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

It was constructive. My husband is a Rat Chef that went to that college. Just because you do not eat rat meat doesnt mean other people don't.75.155.59.190 (talk) 23:53, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

75.155.59.190 Even assuming that "rat chef" is a real thing, "chef" was already in the list of various vocations so specific types of chefs being listed there isn't needed. --Non-Dropframe talk 23:55, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
You do not get it. Rat meat is unique. It is not like any other meat. So yes, it is a different thing.75.155.59.190 (talk) 23:58, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
So please stop making a fool of yourself and leave my edit alone.[1]
Rat meat chefs are real. So stop.75.155.59.190 (talk) 00:02, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
75.155.59.190 Rat chef, cow chef, chicken chef...the article contains a general list of vocations. If we list every single protein a chef can cook with or choose to specialize in, the list will be insanely long. Furthermore, it's a list of programs. Unless I'm missing something, the St. Clair College website does not list "Rat Chef" as an available program. If you have a source that says something different, I'd love to see it. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:06, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Please try to skin,slice, and cook a rat yourself.And Rat Chef Programs are simply not available.75.155.59.190 (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
75.155.59.190 "And Rat Chef Programs are simply not available." So then why did you add it to a list of available programs? --Non-Dropframe talk 00:10, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Noone is joining it, so why have the teachers there?If you want to be a Rat Chef, you can contact St.Clair College.See for yourself. Noone wants to join it, so its not on their website.75.155.59.190 (talk) 00:13, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
75.155.59.190 So it's a program that does exist but there are no teachers or students...? --Non-Dropframe talk 00:15, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
Stupid people like you thought it was a joke. So no. There are no students. And how will teachers get paid to teach when theyre not teaching anyone?75.155.59.190 (talk) 00:16, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
75.155.59.190 Look, I'm very sorry you're offended. The fact of the matter is, again, even assuming this is real, it doesn't bear inclusion in the encyclopedia. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Your choice, Mr.Wikipedia!75.155.59.190 (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Sorry

I thought that the IP reverted that removal. I saw that it was you. My apologies for reverting it again. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 00:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Oshwah, Hey, no worries. I'm sure I've done something similar a time or two myself. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello there!

I'm relatively new, but I've seen you around doing fantastic things, so I just wanted to reach out and say hi and thanks for all the awesomes you do! Drewmutt (talk) 00:12, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hey, Drewmutt! Thank you so much for the compliment! A belated welcome to Wikipedia and if I can be of any assistance to you at all, please to let me know. --Non-Dropframe talk 01:03, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I got your message. That was my first edit so I don't really know how to use citations. I don't really feel all that motivated to learn how so I'll leave it to your discretion. Here is the source on where I got the information - http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2016-11-17/world-trigger-manga-goes-on-indefinite-hiatus-due-to-author-poor-health/.108921

Thanks for your work and props to ya. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.255.247.45 (talk) 03:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thank you for your anti-vandalism work on the project. It definitely does not go unnoticed. -- LuK3 (Talk) 03:07, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Page mover granted

Hello, Non-dropframe. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, post here, or just let me know. Thank you, and happy editing! -- Samtar talk · contribs 21:31, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Fair's fair

I won't edit in a jokey way again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrTesty (talk • contribs) 02:23, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

You made a mistake and reverted constructive and correct edits

Your reversion was a mistake and reverted constructive and correct edits. --73.241.96.130 (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

73.241.96.130, you are indeed correct. In the future, using the edit summary would be very helpful in order to avert similar mistakes. Thanks! —Non-Dropframe talk 04:48, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Eighteen edit

Hi - I have no vested interest in any edit I make and I am fine with your reversion. I just watched the movie. Under the character Clark it says "A life that is thrown upside down when he meets Pip." A true statement but Clark fell in love with Jeff. So was his life thrown upside down more by Jeff than Pip? No need to respond and just leave things as you edited. Eschoryii (talk) 05:46, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
I've seen you really helping with all that vandalism. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia a better place! Bel-Shamharoth (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Thank you so much, Bel-Shamharoth! It's always nice to have my work noticed! —Non-Dropframe talk 23:00, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Hi. I just wanted to let you know that I declined your CSD declination of Chris Jericho and Kevin Owens because the article was in fact deleted from a deletion discussion; it was just that the article was under a different title. Please refer to this. Thank you. 2605:6000:ED08:DD00:4CE5:8E23:B8C5:7E97 (talk) 00:37, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

2605:6000:ED08:DD00:4CE5:8E23:B8C5:7E97, I stand corrected, thank you. —Non-Dropframe talk 00:40, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
I left a note with the previous AfDs on the talk page, in the future I will include them in the speedy template.LM2000 (talk) 00:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Ed Tipper

Hello, I just wanted to let you know that Ed Tipper (WW2 Veteran) passed away this morning. I saw you edited his page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.26.115.252 (talk) 19:25, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks, 186.26.115.252. Per the Biographies of Living Persons guideline, this information requires a citation. Thanks again! —Non-Dropframe talk 19:33, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bisd-tv logo.png

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bisd-tv logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Vandalism warning

Hi, you reverted an edit I made to the page Social graces. I removed the only external link because I judged to be correct the assessment a prior editor made that it consisted only of commercial advertising, and once that was done the edit notice at the top and the two empty headers were redundant, so I removed them. Is there any chance these edits could be re-instated, since they were constructive? (or, well, destructive in a constructive manner!) Thanks! 81.99.141.208 (talk) 02:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey there 81.99.141.208! Sorry about that. The removal of the references section was what made me think it was vandalism. I looked a little closer and edited the page to reflect the main parts of your edit while leaving the references section in place (footnotes will automatically be added here when inline sources are added). Take a look; I think it will reflect your intent. Thanks! —Non-Dropframe talk 02:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
Thanks! 81.99.141.208 (talk) 02:10, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

MR James edit

The article is in British English. Sceptical is spelled without a k in British English. My edit was correct. Please revert your reversion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.116.40 (talk) 00:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

109.154.116.40 my mistake. Thanks for letting me know. —Non-Dropframe talk 00:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Non-dropframe. You have new messages at MereTechnicality's talk page.
Message added 00:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

MereTechnicality (talk) 00:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

List of Presidents of the United States through 2050

I changed your CSD from A10 to db-hoax as the text is a blatant hoax, and I've cautioned the author & other participants accordingly. Cabayi (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Cabayi completely reasonable change. I chose A10 because it came off to me more like a prediction than a hoax but if it seemed more like a hoax in your judgment, I certainly don't mind the switch. And actually, I ended up reverting a change by that same user to Template:US Presidential Administrations perpetuating the same nonsense that, in retrospect, probably should have tipped me off to change the CSD. —Non-Dropframe talk 16:58, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Quote

The 'rudeness' quote on your front page is by Eric Hoffer, just in case you wanted to change that from unknown, ha. GabetheEditor (talkcont) 21:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
also, I came here originally to award you this:

The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
You almost always beat me to these pages and I'm mad!
A barnstar and useful information!? Thanks Gabe! I'll try to leave some for you to tag. ;) —Non-Dropframe talk 21:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

National offender managment service edit

hi non-dropframe,

my edit of this page was correct. hm goverment has annonced that the national offender managemant service (NOMS) will close and be renamed the hmprisons and probation service (HMPPS) april 2017.

<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/justice-secretary-launches-new-prison-and-probation-service-to-reform-offenders">BBC news</a>

Jn1057 (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2017 (UTC)jn1057

6 days on, and i don't seem to have had any response. Any editor in professional media would react much faster than this!

Notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Hello. I saw your recent edit at Russian intervention in US election and it appears you may not have been aware of the Discretionary Sanctions that are in effect there. There is further information on the article talk page. SPECIFICO talk 21:20, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi SPECIFICO! Thank you very much for that information -- I wasn't aware of that. I reverted what appeared to be a run-of-the-mill edit disagreement over verb tense but wouldn't have had I known not to. Thanks again, —Non-Dropframe talk 22:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Edits to University of Massachusetts Lowell Page

Hi,

The edits were made to better organize the "Notable Alumni" section. Instead of simply listing the names, they were organized by their industries (such as Film, Sports etc.).

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Badsharule (talk • contribs) 19:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Article marked for deletion

Hello. I am happy that you read my article on Muhammad Hussain. I believe it has only stated the facts with clear and plenty of secondary sources citations. I believe individuals creating a large impact should be included as encyclopedic content. The copyright text has been removed. Please unmark. Aftab104 (talk) 23:49, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Aftab104! Thanks for removing that copyright protected content. I've removed that concern as a criterion for deletion. However, I've left the other criterion, WP:G11 as the article is highly promotional in its tone. I'm also concerned that either it's a WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY or you have a conflict of interest. If I can be of any assistance, let me know or leave a message at the teahouse where another knowledgeable editor can help. —Non-Dropframe talk 00:01, 17 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Can you please help in toning it down so that it doesn't feel promotional - that was never the intent for it. Can you point out specific sentences that need editing. Thanks. Aftab104 (talk) 00:25, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

I will also leave others edits alone and stop being such a tit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.133.226 (talk) 06:52, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

RE

Please tell this to this people who screw me and when I put the sources. --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 00:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

VengadorJusticiero your conduct on the page, well before you added sources (YouTube is not considered a reliable source, by the way) was extremely hostile, including you telling another user to "suck my pen!s" and "go f*ck yourself." And then you wonder why you were reverted? In fact, by the time you got around to adding a source, you had already violated the 3 Revert Rule. You should familiarize yourself with WP:CONDUCT and WP:3RR before you edit any further. If you have any questions, please let me know and I'd be happy to help. —Non-Dropframe talk 01:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
As we say in my country Colombia: No me joda. --VengadorJusticiero (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
VengadorJusticiero That's precisely what I'm talking about. Wikipedia is a collective work. You need to learn to work with the collective. —Non-Dropframe talk 01:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Edits to adding link to Cathedral School Lucknow

I am talking about this edit. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cathedral%20School%20of%20Lucknow&diff=766423535

How is this a case of vandalism? This case shook Lucknow and has effectively lead to a new retrospection in the education system of the city of Lucknow. The case received high media coverage and state government's attention as well. I am not sure how this edit is an act of vandalism when it highly constructive to the overall information related to the school?

Sandy9292 (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gelora Citramas Stadium

Hi,

I'm reverting an XfD template added from banned user: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nsmutte. Thanks. 172.58.41.56 (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Contacting members an obstable

How to talk to someone who's deleted a page I was contributing to? User talk:Kurykh is the identity who deleted it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisH17 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

ChrisH17Simply go to their user talk page and leave a message just as you did here. —Non-Dropframe talk 15:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
I can not do that because there is no Edit Source link on their page.
ChrisH17There should be an "Edit this page" button at the top of the page. —Non-Dropframe talk 15:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
"There should be" yes I agree, but I do not see it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ChrisH17 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
ChrisH17 Ah, I see what's going on. The page is restricted to autoconfirmed users. I'm assuming you're not yet autoconformed. I'll leave Kurykh a message and see if they'll talk to you on your talk page. —Non-Dropframe talk 15:51, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Re: AfD

I've posted a suggestion and a comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Outline of the Bible. The Transhumanist 20:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Addition of {{hasty}} to Sleep Hackers

I'm well aware of this standard, but chose to tag it anyway. Reason; I cast about the net looking for references for this band. Does it exist? Yes. Is it notable? No. There's nothing about the band to sustain notability. Adding {{hasty}} is just delaying the inevitable. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Hey Hammersoft. You're absolutely right. Delaying the inevitable was exactly the point. The page's creator is new and per WP:BITE, it's incumbent upon us more experienced editors to be a little softer/kinder in our approach to dealing with newcomers. Granted, there isn't a snowball's chance that page will last but the new editor is probably here to help and a big scary red template just moments after they tried to help isn't a brilliant welcome. It might seem silly or pointless but giving 10 minutes really does make a difference. In my estimation, throwing a {{hasty}} on it at least tells the editor that it's not like we're all out to get them. —Non-Dropframe talk 21:35, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
  • Waiting ten minutes isn't going to bite him any less. I'm quite passionate about defending new editors, so I'm very well aware of the issues of being welcoming to new editors. However, there's a massive difference between a new editor trying to advertise a non-notable band and a new editor dumping a large article on their first edit that just might turn into something. When I first saw this yesterday, I didn't tag it with anything as it was obvious the editor was trying to contribute. In the case of this band article, it's either a person with a vested interest or a fan, given that the band has zero notability. Waiting ten minutes isn't going to change that. My point here isn't to chastise you for placing the hasty tag, but to point out there is discretion going on here and I didn't willy-nilly tag it, happily biting off the head of a new editor in the process. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Request changes to site

Hello I went in to an entry for VLSCI to update it. It is my job to ensure all information about our organisation online is up to date, so I wanted to do that. We have recently changed our name and our history and personnel also needs updating. There is no-one I can ask to do this who is not connected with the group, so am not sure how to make this happen without it being perceived as self-interest. There is also a new logo to upload. Would you advise how to proceed? Create a new page for Melbourne Bioinformatics and make VLSCI entry reflect its current history or revise the existing page as below. And is it permissible for me to do those changes? I am aware it is not a marketing exercise.

The changes required are as follows:

Melbourne Bioinformatics (formerly VLSCI)

The Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative was established as a $100m initiative of the Victorian Government in partnership with The University of Melbourne and the IBM Life Sciences Research Collaboratory, Melbourne. Other major stakeholders included key Victorian health and medical research institutions, major universities and public research organisations. Over 2009-2016 a petascale facility was established to deliver expertise and systems for life sciences computing. The VLSCI was considered a part of the Victorian government's plans to support biotechnology, and is listed as a key infrastructure projects in the Victorian Biotechnology Action Plan 2011. In 2017, VLSCI evolved into Melbourne Bioinformatics, to focus on the needs of its partners in the Melbourne biosciences and biomedical precinct.

Hjgvdp (talk) 02:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Hjgvdp! I very much apreciate that you are aware of the conflict of interest guidelines. In order to request changes, simply make the request on the article's talk page and add the {{request edit}} template. —Non-Dropframe talk 02:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ hollygrove

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ hollygrove. As the IP removed PROD template, you may be interested in participating this AFD that I started. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 16:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

A1 on Sumdog

FYI I removed the A1 tag and replaced it with a PROD since Googleing made the subject clear (its an educational games company.) The article appears to be talking about the game and not the company, and it doesn't appear to be web based, or I would have used A7. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Torus

I made a change about the Fujitsu Tofu connection. The original 6D torus description is wrong and misleading. To be precise, it is called 3D torus 3D mesh structure. For detail, google Tofu interconnection. 

00:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Re: Enrico Lazzara

I noticed you G11 and G12d this page. Because it is a CVio, should it be blanked? Thanks. I got to the creator's user page via STiki because they were vandalising, and saw the CSD notice. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 22:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey, L3X1! Per WP:G12, blanking only needs to be done in "equivocal cases that do not meet speedy deletion criteria." Since the article will be deleted within (what I can only assume will be) a reasonable period of time, it's not important to blank them...unless you're aware of a guideline that says otherwise, in which case, do let me know! —Non-Dropframe talk 22:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I'm not aware of any guidelines that say otherwise. I'm am looking at expanding my operations beyond vandalism into NPP. Do you have any tips or methods for doing that, or interpreting applicable WP? Thanks. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 02:15, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
L3X1, I think my biggest piece of advice is not being hasty. With a few exceptions (blatant vandalism, attacks, adverts, copyright infringement), new users tend to be well meaning and tagging their pages for deletion moments after creation tends to upset them and/or scare them off. I try to give at least ten minutes before tagging to soften the blow a bit. Also, always be polite and offer help when you speak to them. You might be able to turn an otherwise unpleasant experience into one that encourages a user to figure out how to edit constructively. Um...what else? Oh, I tend to construe speedy deletion categories fairly narrowly. Some people will cram an article into a category that sorta kinda fits if you tilt your head and squint...but I'd recommend against that. Anyhow, does that sort of answer your question? I'm happy to help in any way I can. —Non-Dropframe talk 00:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes it does. Thanks for answering me. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 01:45, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User talk:Chander14

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User talk:Chander14, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 06:59, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Declined speedy

Information icon Hi, Non-dropframe. Thanks for patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for Omniphiles, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, under criterion A11 because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. This article doesn't "plainly [indicate] that the subject was invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally" - it says nothing about coinage at all, it just gives a basic dictionary definition. Please take a moment to read the new tutorial for patrollers, criteria for speedy deletion, and particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion or proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Thanks! --McGeddon (talk) 17:21, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

McGeddon WP:DTR. —Non-Dropframe talk 17:25, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Music Supervisors

Hi! I've just added several sources, please take in consideration Randall Poster is one of the most well known and notable music supervisors, it desserves an article in Wiki as the responsible of iconic soundtracks for movies like Kids or The Wolf of Wall Street and series like Vinyl. Thank you! Theautomator2017 (talk) 01:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Review of LiquidHub page

Hi,

Could you please help me understand the reason the page I had created "LiquidHub" has been flagged for deletion? I understand it had some sections that were against Wiki's neutrality policy. I have tried my best to fix them. Could you please review it and let me know if it seems fine now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sindhuja Sukumaran (talk • contribs) 14:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi there Sindhuja Sukumaran. Unfortunately, the article's entire tone is quite promotional instead of being a neutral reporting of facts. For more information about that, see WP:NOTADVERTISING and Wikipedia:Spam. Further, I'm concerned that you might have a conflict of interest. See WP:COI. If I can explain further, let me know. Also, consider taking the Wikipedia Adventure for an introduction to editing. Finally, the Teahouse is a great resource where other editors can answer questions. —Non-Dropframe talk 14:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Well that is a first

For me anyway. Hello N. You and Fram added tags to the Shemira (The Guarding) at almost the same time - I was adding a speedy but I was a few seconds too slow or we would have three choices of what to do with the article :-) The two of you might want to put your heads together and decide which one to go with. Thanks for your efforts and your time. MarnetteD|Talk 17:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Khamr

Didn't mean to cut you off there, I was just in the middle of expanding the stub with cited content to discuss the literal and extended definitions of khamr, which I believe justify a standalone article rather than a redirect. Goonsquad LCpl Mulvaney (talk) 21:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

ATM Enamul zahir

this page should be on Wikipedia.. I think u can not delete this page..help me Tuhin16 (talk) 15:39, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi Tuhin16. Wikipedia does have specific guidelines for inclusion. The most important of these is the General Notability Guideline. I'd highly suggest you go on the Wikipedia Adventure to learn all about contributing to Wikipedia. Finally, you can always get help at the Teahouse. —Non-Dropframe talk 15:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
  1. ^ http://firstwefeast.com/eat/2016/11/river-rat-burgers-sweep-russian-restaurants
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Non-dropframe/Archive_7&oldid=1085979162"