User talk:Non-dropframe/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 ← Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8

09:05:17, 20 July 2015 review of submission by Hugh gordon rock

Many thanks for the comments and the suggestion to resubmit. I will probably wait awhile for that as the pagename could benefit from being more prevalent in the literature. Cheers Hugh gordon rock (talk) 09:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Hugh gordon rock (talk) 09:05, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Request on 00:00:54, 20 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by SPAYDEDDOG


Hi, i see you declined my article for Caesar and Otto's Paranormal Halloween. I understand as im new to all of this. I didnt realize the first draft wasn't totally deleted. How do I go ahead and delete that and resubmit with my second draft attempt? SPAYDEDDOG (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC)SPAYDEDDOG


SPAYDEDDOG (talk) 00:00, 20 July 2015 (UTC) SPAYDEDDOG hi there, you can simply make edits to the original draft. After you're satisfied with the draft, simply click the "resubmit" button in the red decline box near the top of the page or add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

12:41:22, 20 July 2015 review of submission by Deajan


This software is cited by the official wiki of Samba project (see link in article) and aims to help people who want to sync their Samba servers among others. It is of public interest and is not in any way a commercial software. I created the article in order to add it to the Comparison_of_file_synchronization_software article Wikipedia which holds with links for each sync software. Is there any reason why this software cannot be added there ?

Regards, Orsiris de Jong.

Deajan (talk) 12:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC) Deajan, article subjects need to have their notability established through verifiable third-party sources. Primary sources like the one you mentioned aren't sufficient. Thanks! --Non-Dropframe talk 12:47, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Non-dropframe, I'm sorry to insist, but isn't the Samba wiki a verifiable third-party source ? Deajan 14:01, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
Deajan, please review WP:VERIFY which explains in-depth the standards for verifiable sources. Also note that your sources need to demonstrate notability.

cele comedian

12:49, 22 July 2015 (UTC)Cele comedian (talk)am mattew bright femi popularly know as cele comedian, actor, producer, nd song write 

from lagos state /edo state  i attended university of Benin where I obtain a degree in  theatre art

cele comedian is am under grade comedian who sees Ay and Mr ben and some others good standup 

Comedians  as a mentor cele comedians has a  put smile in faces of so many people worldwide true social networking

and medias cele has don so well in the industry he has also Don so many comedy movies such as Cele in police palava, Cele in see mugu, cele in mugu Don wise, cele in the fake prophet etc

16:20:05, 23 July 2015 review of submission by Rjayapalan


Thanks for reviewing the page and I appreciate your comments. Meanwhile I am eager to in what other way can I create a company page for my own company? As far as I know I have listed only the things what my company does from the official website that has been legally verified. Also I did see to that only features/ specifications of the products and services rather than benefits which would sound like promotional content. Kindly let me know. Thanks Rjayapalan (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Rjayapalan (talk) 16:20, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Rjayapalan, WP:SPAM describes what sort of content counts as promotional material. That being said, my major concern is that you have a conflict of interest as you clearly have a direct relationship to the company in question. COI editing on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged. --Non-Dropframe talk 16:30, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

16:15:36, 23 July 2015 review of submission by Marilyn katz


Can't agree with your assessment. 30 pages of references in Google. Published two books and a few dozen articles. Referenced in every book about Obama and Harold Washington. Frequent commentator on issues political and women's topics. Let me know your reasoning.

Marilyn katz (talk) 16:15, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Marilyn katz, please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for information on how to properly incorporate verifiable sources into your article. Let me know if I can be of any help on that. Also, please note that per WP:AUTO, "writing an autobiography on Wikipedia is strongly discouraged." --Non-Dropframe talk 16:27, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
WOuld love your help. Shall I shorten and de-narrate? And where do I put the citations? Or should they relate specifically to 'claims I make"Marilyn katz (talk) 16:40, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Marilyn katz, I suggest you begin by reading Wikipedia:Citing sources and WP:INLINECITE. I know it's a lot of material so take your time and work through each citation slowly, making sure each one meets WP:VERIFY. The ultimate goal is building a case for notability with your citations. --Non-Dropframe talk 16:45, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Request on 16:35:46, 23 July 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sreenanda Shankar


The last person reviewing my article has said that it is autobiographical so has been deleted. IT IS NOT. I am not Sreenanda Shankar. I am using the username because it makes sense when creating a page for her. I am her manager.


Sreenanda Shankar (talk) 16:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Sreenanda Shankar I was not the one who tagged the draft (which has not been deleted) as an autobiography. That was Missvain whom I have pinged. Missvain, if you wouldn't mind explaining your reasoning to Sreenanda Shankar, I'd appreciate it. Sreenanda Shankar, I'm going to strongly advise that you read WP:REF and WP:VERIFY in order to learn more about properly referencing your article to establish its notability. --Non-Dropframe talk 16:41, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Hi. It's because your username is the same as the name of the subject you are writing about. While it's fine to have a real name as your username, it implies that 1) you are writing the biography about yourself (even though you just said you are not Sreenanda Shankar) and 2) you have a conflict of interest. You have just stated you do have a conflict of interest - you need to declare that on your user page and I strongly advise that you do not write an article about a person you work for. I"ll leave information on your talk page about this User:Sreenanda Shankar. -- Missvain (talk) 17:32, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

Why I did what I did, and why your charges are false

First, the situation in Turkey has changed incredibly much in the last week, second, how is changing a link to a small paragraph to a link to a major article disruptive? The stuff in the article Spillover of the Syrian Civil War (most of which I WROTE thankyouverymuch) was unnecessary once the link to an article which already has the same information in greater detail and better presented is added. It is the duty of Wikipedians to improve articles, your reversion is the opposite of that. Ericl (talk) 15:35, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

  • Ericl, as was explained twice on your talk page, you made controversial edits removing a significant amount of referenced material without giving a valid reason in the edit summary. You do not own the content so the fact that you may have written much of the article is irrelevant. The edit summary function exists for a reason. Please use it. --Non-Dropframe talk 15:40, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

14:00:08, 28 July 2015 review of submission by 10squared


10squared (talk) 14:00, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Editions

There are four editions of K-Lite Codec Pack[1], all stuffed with adware, the presence of which is not disclosed, as of July 28, 2015, anywhere obvious on the Downloads, FAQ, home, etc. pages of the K-Lite Web site. During a fresh install, the last -- and easy to overlook and consent to by default -- setup-wizard page of many has a surprise mention of the adware payload, forcing the user to make a deliberate, non-default choice to opt out of the adware.

24.125.2.17, while I understand your desire to inform people about this, such controversial claims must be backed up with a source. --Non-Dropframe talk 02:44, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Request on 17:33:06, 3 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by NABolalek


Hello! I submitted an article for review (first attempt to create a page) and I gather that you are the editor who reviewed it. Thank you for doing so - I suspected when I hit submit the article was not going to be accepted. Being new to this entire process, I am in very unfamiliar waters and was wondering if you might share some insight on what I must do to move forward. Thank you in advance for any tips and recommendations you are willing to share. Nadia


NABolalek (talk) 17:33, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Request about China Energy Fund Committee

I am SUNREST, I want to open the article about China Energy Fund Committee, the supporting is over there, anyone can help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SUNREST (talk • contribs) 15:18, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Re: 02:27, 2 July 2015 review of submission by Non-dropframe

Dear Non-dropframe,

Last month I submitted edits for the article at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetically_modified_organism, consisting of 29 sentences composed by me, 9 quoted sentences and 14 references.

It appears you rejected all of the edits on July 2, with a single comment that "Rv edit not in-line with refrence."

As written now, the article looks like a promo piece for the agri-biotech industry.


Edit #1:

My first edit was to the lead sentence of the second paragraph in the Controversy section, which -- besides beginning with the stylistically disfavored "There is..." -- erroneously states "There is broad scientific consensus that food on the market derived from GM crops poses no greater risk than conventional food" without attributing that viewpoint to anybody. Instead, as written, Wikipedia is asserting this to be true.

That sentence is followed by four citations -- to the Economist (which does not mention a consensus), a statement from AAAS board members, an EU research project and a paper by Pamela Ronald.

Regarding AAAS and the EU research, ENSSER fact-checks as follows [with relevant citations]: 

    A statement by the board of directors of the American Association for
    the Advancement of Science (AAAS) affirming the safety of GM crops and
    opposing labelling[25] cannot be assumed to represent the view of AAAS
    members as a whole and was challenged in an open letter by a group of
    21 scientists, including many long-standing members of the AAAS.[26]
    This episode underlined the lack of consensus among scientists about
    GMO safety.

    4. EU research project does not provide reliable evidence of GM food safety

    An EU research project[27] has been cited internationally as providing
    evidence for GM crop and food safety. However, the report based on
    this project, "A Decade of EU-Funded GMO Research", presents no data
    that could provide such evidence, from long-term feeding studies in
    animals.

    Indeed, the project was not designed to test the safety of any single
    GM food, but to focus on "the development of safety assessment
    approaches".[28] Only five published animal feeding studies are
    referenced in the SAFOTEST section of the report, which is dedicated
    to GM food safety.[29] None of these studies tested a commercialised
    GM food; none tested the GM food for long-term effects beyond the
    subchronic period of 90 days; all found differences in the GM-fed
    animals, which in some cases were statistically significant; and none
    concluded on the safety of the GM food tested, let alone on the safety
    of GM foods in general. Therefore the EU research project provides no
    evidence for sweeping claims about the safety of any single GM food or
    of GM crops in general.


I therefore suggest replacing "There is... consensus" with "GMO advocates claim there is... consensus." This edit #1 is in-line with the references; the original sentence is not.


Edit #2:

My suggested edit #2 is to the subsequent sentence of that second paragraph, and to one of its citations. The original text selectively quotes from that citation, and omits the two very next sentences that followed -- which begin with "However, ..." My edit is to include these two key sentences in the citation, and to clarify the article text so that it is in-line with its own citation.


Edit #3:

My edit #3 is to the third paragraph of the Controversy section, which now inadequately represents the viewpoint of "Opponents of genetically modified food." My edit is to prepend an introductory sentence that makes clear how this paragraph is a counterpoint to the previous paragraph -- which made a blanket (but erroneous) assertion that there is a consensus on GMO safety. Then I added a second, factual sentence with evidence. These new sentences are are in-line with the newly-provided reference, which itself has numerous references.


Edits #4 - #29:

Most of my remaining 29 edits, in 10 new paragraphs, are replete with pertinent references. I won't belabor the discussion here now by citing all the citations. Other than any introductory or concluding sentence, which specific suggested sentence do you think is NOT in-line with its reference(s) or otherwise needs to be clarified?

Best regards, CommonGround2100 (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

06:57:28, 6 August 2015 review of submission by RKUV


RKUV (talk) 06:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello. I'm kind of new at the finer details of wiki editing, but I know this subject very well and the article is basically a translation of its swedish counterpart (only fleshed out a bit where some info was lacking). There's already a page on The Soundtrack Of Our Lives here, which indeed are an internationally reknown rock band, as well as the other bands Bärjed was/is in or have guested with - see Discogs.com for proof on the matter. Is the page ok for being an "official stub" so other can join in and work on it? Thanks for your patience and help. /RKUV

A kitten for you!

D

FreeDistrict (talk) 13:26, 8 August 2015 (UTC)

On Reejction and References for PAC Cuba draft - Agosto 2015

Hello! I am sorry for my mistakes. I am new to Wikipedia world. Sorry I insist but PAC is a notable subject in the Cuban context. PAC is the first group in its kind in Cuba, a country where for many years spontaneous or non-official associations, as PAC is, were forbidden, and where animal welfare is not a priority but neglected.

It it is difficult to find references PAC Cuba- because: 1-) the group is quite young, 2-)it is run by volunteers with -as I said before- no support from the goverment -and so from the Cuban media that are highly officialist. For that reason only no oficial media -as web pages- and/or blog are reporting or acknoledging PAC existance.

However the work that this group has done so far -and that potentially can do- is so important for Cuba that I really believe it is worthy to report its mere existance in Wikipedia. PAC is the first group in its kind in Cuba, a country where for many years spontaneous or non-official associations were forbidden, and where animal welfare is not a priority.

I want to point that Wikipedia has pages for groups simialr to PAC. They have also used in theirs pages links to other web pages as references. Not that I am defending what is wrong, this is not the best way, I know, but sometimes there is not another. Look for example -among others: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Pack https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_Chance_Animal_Rescue_Society

Aware youa re busy but if you are so kind to suggest me how to improve my article I will very much appreciate it.

Best,

Valia Rodriguez — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valia.rodriguez (talk • contribs) 01:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedya7

Saying someone is a professor may or may not be actual notability according to WP:PROF, but it indicates enough importance to pass speedy DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 22 August 2015 (UTC)

11:47:49, 24 August 2015 review of submission by Uddhavasharan


Hello, Yesterday I have applied for a revision request on the above mentioned article. Today I got the message that the request I have done is 'void'. It says: "We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer."

The reason why my submission was void is due to the note which was appearing on the page which says: {{SAFESUBST:Void|

So due to that I didn't add anything to the article/page as it says, "Just press the "Save page" button below without changing anything!" Accordingly I just pressed that "Save page" button and didn't do or add anything. Regarding the "Articles for creation/Narayan Baba" I have made a total revision and I have prepared that in my sandbox and I am waiting to get allowance to submit it. Now I would like to know where and when I have to upload or copy the revised article. Thank you for the help. Uddhavasharan (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Uddhavasharan (talk) 11:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

14:08:50, 24 August 2015 review of submission by DialMyCalls


How are you doing today? My recent submission was declined due to the references and I went in and edited out all of the scholarship stuff as I did not see that to be important information when trying to make a legitimate profile for this online company. I am not trying to create an advertisement for DialMyCalls but more of a resource so when searched, people know exactly what the company is. I'd love to work with you so that we can get this page up to the guidelines of Wikipedia and published. Thank you in advance for your time!

DialMyCalls (talk) 14:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

KLITE IS ADWARE. RATHER THAN KILL MY COPY, GET OFF YOUR AZS AND TEST THE INSTALL YOURSELF.

You undid my edits instantly -- WITHOUT CITING YOUR OWN RELIABLE SOURCE. The article is wrong. Instead of PIZSING ON USERS TRYING TO HELP OTHERS, why don't you INSTALL THE SOFTWARE MENTIONED and LOOK FOR YOURSELF?

I DO NOT HAVE TIME FOR BYLLZHIT. YOU ARE HELPING THE A-HOLES AT KLITE SPREAD ADWARE.

TO DO YOUR OWN HOMEWORK, INSTALL THE MEGA PACK NOTED BELOW. CHOOSE ADVANCED (DETAILED) INSTALL. LAST PAGE OF SETUP WIZARD:

/* Editions */ WARNING -- KLITE CONTAINS HIDDEN ADWARE. SEEN IN A FRESH INSTALL OF THE 2015-07-21 K-Lite_Codec_Pack_1130_Mega.exe AND 2015-07-27 PACK UPDATE klcp_update_1132_20150727.exe

NO MORE TIME FOR THIS. UP TO YOU TO DO THE RIGHT THING (GET OFF YOUR AZS AND TEST, RATHER THAN KILL COPY). BYE

--Non-Dropframe talk 20:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Tag of Kal Jisne Dekha

Hi there, just FYI, I declined deletion of Kal Jisne Dekha, as the criteria WP:CSD#A1 did not apply. A google search turned up multiple results to this upcoming film. It appears to be notable. Jujutacular (talk) 01:18, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Jujutacular, at the time I nominated the page (see revision here[1]), the page contained virtually no content and was absolutely a candidate for WP:A1. The decline is fine as the page has since been fixed. However, please note that A1 has absolutely nothing to do with notability. Thanks, --Non-Dropframe talk 20:21, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I would simply caution you to be more careful in tagging pages for speedy deletion. The title alone combined with a google search was enough to show speedy deletion was not necessary, so I'll have to respectfully disagree with you there. Users are much more likely to contribute more content if they feel that their work won't be rejected unnecessarily. Jujutacular (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Jujutacular, the "work" was six words which had been allowed to sit for more than 10 minutes per WP:BITE and related consensus. The article as it stood was absolutely a candidate for WP:A1 as there was no context provided (article title + google ≠ context). Further the article in my mind only just passes WP:NFILM otherwise I'd have brought it to AfD. --Non-Dropframe talk 22:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

17:17:57, 1 September 2015 review of submission by Carlyepacker1


Hi there! I have completely re-edited the "Los Angeles Nomadic Division" page. Do I need to submit it for a second time? Thank you!


Carlyepacker1 (talk) 17:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Beth Fertig

What makes you think this meets the criteria for speedy deletion? She's a nationally known figure, regularly filing reports and features for NPR. What gives? Mr. Swordfish (talk) 21:40, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Mr swordfish, I was unable to find sources to that affect nor were they provided in the article. --Non-Dropframe talk 21:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
The cites were in External Links. I've added them as references. Is this enough? Mr. Swordfish (talk) 22:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Mr swordfish, those are primary sources which cannot be used as evidence of notability. I'd recommend reviewing WP:GNG and WP:NBIO which describe notability guidelines as well as WP:VERIFY which describes how to demonstrate notability through verifiable third-party sources. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. --Non-Dropframe talk 22:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
I'm quite familiar with the wiki policies you cite. I do not think they mean what you think they mean. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
Mr swordfish, please point out where I'm mistaken. The following is taken from WP:THIRDPARTY.
The necessity of reliable, third-party sources is cemented in several of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines:
  • Wikipedia's policy on both Verifiability and No original research states that "If no reliable, third-party sources can be found for an article topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it."
  • Wikipedia's policy on Verifiability states that "Articles should be based upon reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy."
  • Wikipedia's guideline on Reliable sources states that "Wikipedia articles should rely primarily on reliable, third-party, published sources".
  • Wikipedia's guideline on Notability states that "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article." --Non-Dropframe talk 00:03, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Since we seem to be wiki-lawyering here, please see the wiki policy on Speedy Deletion: Speedy deletion should not be used except in the most obvious cases. "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Speedy_deletion
You are abusing the process. Take it to Afd if you think you have a case. Cheers. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 01:17, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Mr swordfish,You may not remove CSD tags from articles you have created yourself. I will absolutely take the case to AfD if the CSD is properly declined. --Non-Dropframe talk 02:29, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Be my guest. I'll be happy to have an an adult conversation with disinterested editors about whether the subject is sufficiently notable. There's room for debate here, and I'll respect the consensus regardless of whether the article stays or not. But the proper venue for that is AFD, not speedy deletion. Please pay attention to what other editors are saying: be more careful in tagging pages for speedy deletion. The policy is quite clear that speedy deletion should only be used in the most obvious cases. I see that another editor has already removed the CSD tag - appropriately, since it is an abuse of process to put it there in the first place. Mr. Swordfish (talk) 11:49, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
Mr swordfish, your criticism is noted. In return, I'll have you note that I've been patrolling new pages for many years now and am very familiar with the related policies and procedures. I followed the procedure by tagging the page as it appeared to fit the category. The procedure continued to work as intended as another user disagreed with my rationale and removed the tag. I'd thank you very much to stop accusing me of "abuse." --Non-Dropframe talk 19:48, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

05:04:30, 14 September 2015 review of submission by SUNREST


SUNREST (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

I changed and put more effort on the page, pls review

User:Kdaly100

Thanks for that I probably was too quick off the mark BustOut (talk) 15:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Kdaly100, hey no worries, just a friendly reminder. --Non-Dropframe talk 15:45, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

That thing that won't translate

I've taken your Hausa off as it doesn't appear to be to me, no matter what GT says. Actually, Uzbek gives more of a result - more words anyway - but I reckon it's something from Pakistan area but typed in Roman letters. 'Jahangir' fits with that area, but not with Hausa. GT can't always be trusted with strange versions of Foreign... Peridon (talk) 19:35, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Josu4u. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Sai Ankur, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Josu4u (talk) 10:47, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Thank you!

Hey, thanks for removing the vandalism from my talk page. Much appreciated! Mww113 (talk) 00:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Mww113, always happy to help! --Non-Dropframe talk 07:50, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

I am new here so plz remove my content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Indianvivaha (talk • contribs) 10:56, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

About the adventist church

My comment about the adventist church being homophobic is perfectly factual. The fact that the truth is disturbing does not make it "not constructive". I can't help that they hate gay people.

2601:647:4A01:2537:D51C:3AF7:6CBB:F267 opinions are not encyclopedic, facts are. "Homophobic" is a conclusion based on your perspective, not a fact, and such a claim MUST be backed up by a very solid refrence. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Historically accurate flags

Hello! I updated the flags on the World Football Elo Ratings to be consistent with the tournaments to which they refer. As an example, the 1938 World Cup was hosted by the Third Reich, and therefore the current Germany flag would be incorrect. The wikipedia page for that tournament (and others) takes my approach, so there is precedent. I plan to update the remaining sections to be consistent, as well, if you will let me. These edits only need to be done once and won't be impacted by future edits. What are your thoughts? Thank you. Spiaggia12 (talk) 00:43, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Spiaggia12 thank you for your explanation. This is clearly my mistake and I offer my apologies. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:10, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Murderous defamation on Osama Abdul Mohsen

Oh yes, you made a terrible mistake: You help spreading false, easily disprovable defamative shit about someone who is subjected to Islamophobia and xenophobia anyway. Just look at the original defamative FB picture post itself to see the complete lack of supportive arguments: https://www.facebook.com/leith.fadel/posts/10204810884253060

What you erased by “reverting” was in no way deconstructive but simply pointed to the lack of consistancy in the defamative posts themselves.

Defamation kills!

Jhartmann hello, your edit did not conform to WP:NOPV and as such, was reverted. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:12, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Edits to page Antoine Bello

Hello Non-dropframe, I'm surprised you turned down my edits to the page Antoine Bello. I feel like I vastly improved the page by plugging in elements from the French and Italian pages and adding an extensive bibliography. What exactly do you think I should have done differently? Please advise. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gottlieb43 (talk • contribs) 12:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Gottlieb43 Hello, I reverted your edit as it was unsourced and, per WP:BLPSOURCES, it needed to be. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

21:32:49, 24 September 2015 review of submission by Sks0412

Sks0412, hello, if you have a question please feel free to ask it here. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:15, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Multiple reverts

Can you do something about the unregistered idiot who keeps boldfacing the beginning paragraph of the background section of Gibbons v Ogden? PraeceptorIP (talk) 15:10, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

PraeceptorIP hi there, I'm not an admin but it appears that IP has been blocked. --Non-Dropframe talk 17:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Halictus rubicundus page

HI, I'm working on a school project for the Halictus rubicundus page for a class project. I was wondering if you would mind leaving up the work that I have done for this project! Thanks Sayabery (talk) 03:33, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Biased edits into a page with little reference accuracy.

I find it amusing you quote the WP:NOPV when you reverted many of the edits that actually brought a bit of the neutral point of view in the DolarToday. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Non-imperialslave (talk • contribs) 04:09, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

I have seen you reverted several edits into the DolarToday page that is about the illegal exchange rate references into the Venezuelan currency. After reviewing the page it seem most of the information is biased towards one side with no reference whatsoever from the official government entities. Why is that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Non-imperialslave (talk • contribs) 04:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Non-imperialslave referencing "official government entities" is exactly the problem. They are not neutral third-party sources (see WP:VERIFY) but are rather directly involved. As I do not desire to enter into an edit war, I'm not going to revert your latest edit just yet and instead hope to have a constructive conversation with you instead. --Non-Dropframe talk 04:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

To actually bring neutrality to a page you have to mention both sides of the story and reference both sides. What is seen on the entire information is just one side of the story over and over, even going to the point of placing an "Awards" section referencing a fake award that was conducted with no information towards the participants. Saying that referencing official sources is "exactly the problem" just awes me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Non-imperialslave (talk • contribs) 04:20, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Also, the part about editing "hack" to "blocked" and you reverting even that edit is also a red flag for me. The government is not "hacking" the DolarToday page, that would mean actually penetrating the webpage servers security and modifying the server files. Non-imperialslave (talk) 04:26, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

WP:VERIFY also talks about "Mainstream newspapers" but I see zero mainstream newspapers from the country. We also have this part "fairly representing all majority and significant-minority viewpoints published by reliable sources, in rough proportion to the prominence of each view", I can see again zero fair representation of every view expressed in the page. Non-imperialslave (talk) 04:30, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Also no need for the hypocrisy stating that you are not gonna revert and then suddenly another user pops up and does the same thing you are doing without checking actual edits. Don't have time to deal with childs. Non-imperialslave (talk) 04:43, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Debbie

I think it's fair to point out that SPLC is left-wing, since the Conservative groups were labeled as such. Stopwikibias (talk) 00:11, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Stopwikibias, I assure you that I have very little respect for the SPLC and have no issue with it being labeled as liberal or left-wing. However, this needs to backed up with a reference. The real issue I had with the edit was your addition of the word "unreliable." Do I personally agree? Yes. However, this would need to be backed up with a reference from a reliable, verifiable, neutral source -- which I'm going to guess would be nearly impossible to find. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I agree, "unreliable" is opinion, and I've removed it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stopwikibias (talk • contribs) 00:23, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Stopwikibias, I would still encourage you to cite the liberal claim. Further, I would like to both encourage you to combat bias as your username seems to suggest is your goal while at the same time be willing to patiently learn the social mores of the Wikipedia community. --Non-Dropframe talk 00:36, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Opinions noted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stopwikibias (talk • contribs) 02:03, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Piper Curda

I put true information of Piper Curda on her page. She's currently dating Olivia Holt and you took it off. Can you put it back on? Koolkitkat (talk) 16:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

Koolkitkat Hi there, that information may well have been true but information like that on biographies of living people needs to be accompanied by a verifiable reference. Thanks! --Non-Dropframe talk 22:55, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Mistake

I believe you may have made a mistake. I did not edit an article about a revolutionary war hero named Gorman. I certainly did not say he was gay. Please remove the remarks from my page. I would appreciate it. 167.88.225.101 (talk) 22:44, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Horton225

On Nathaniel Gorham's page, you edited "John Hancock" to "was a gay". 89sec (talk) 22:46, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
167.88.225.101 Hi there, as IP addresses can change, it may well not have been you who made that edit but your IP address was indeed used to make that edit. I would strongly encourage you to create an account to prevent future confusion. --Non-Dropframe talk 22:58, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

این نشان برای شما!

نشان مهربانی
hi,plz help me to create a real and nice post in the wikipedia,I'll thank u 
Adolf.witzler (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Adolf.witzler, hello! There are a variety of resources for you to learn about contributing new articles to Wikipedia. For example, Wikipedia:Your first article is a great place to start. For a more general (and fun) lesson about Wikipedia, I highly recommend going on the Wikipedia Adventure. If I can be of further help, please let me know! --Non-Dropframe talk 11:46, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi,

I saw your note re John Matisonn's page and have tried to improve it - make it more objective. Another editor has also assisted me. I hope you will continue to monitor additions I make to ensure I meet the Wikipedia standards for a useful article.

Kind regards, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sugar Activism (talk • contribs) 15:25, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Sugar Activism, looks to be in good shape now. I'd highly recommend going on the Wikipedia Adventure to learn all about contributing to Wikipedia. It only takes about an hour and it's fun too! --Non-Dropframe talk 15:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

F.B.I. (album)

I was just correcting the release date for the album — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.84.216.146 (talk) 21:37, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

what the heck, man?

i was putting in the Virginia is for Lovers article TRUE INFORMATION. Christian Weston Chandler CANNOT get a girlfriend. If you don't know who that is, look it up. He's an embarrassment. You might know him as the guy who maced a GameStop employee back in 2014, the guy who made the Sonichu internet comics, or you might know him as the guy who's house was on fire in ruckersville, virginia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:32A0:5BE0:5CA5:2B90:18F5:41A0 (talk) 22:17, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

2602:306:32A0:5BE0:5CA5:2B90:18F5:41A0 Something merely being true is not the only benchmark for inclusion in Wikipedia. The information needs to be both notable and include a citation from a verifiable source.--Non-Dropframe talk 22:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

IP??

Hi, I was wondering if Wikipedia does anything with your IP or share it to anyone else?? Thanks, Talkboy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiboy20928 (talk • contribs) 22:28, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Wikiboy20928 Not that I'm aware of. You might try the Help Desk. --Non-Dropframe talk 22:39, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

You are invited to Café Chocolate!

Hi, Non-dropframe! Come to my Café! It's got food & drinks! What do you want? Are you hungry? I seem a bit hungry for digital food... well, reply to me if you want to come! Gotta take orders now! The cafe is here.ScarlettCoffee (talk) 02:46, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

What??

Cmon Man, You Should Not Delete Macau Anglican College, It's Good And It's Cool. #69SWAG A7YrOld (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

A7YrOld I'm glad you like your school but Wikipedia does have certain standards for articles and Wikipedia is not a place to add largely incoherent and meaningless content. Take a look at WP:FIRSTARTICLE to learn more about contributing constructively. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:21, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
GO AND LOOK UP MY SCHOOL — Preceding unsigned comment added by A7YrOld (talk • contribs) 11:03, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
A7YrOld Did you actually read anything I said? --Non-Dropframe talk 11:07, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2nd - Venture Cup edit revert

I don't see why you didn't find my edit constructive. I'm in the Danish office of Venture Cup right now and I'm just trying to have more complete information on their wikipedia page. Please explain what you found problematic. There was no advertising, bragging or irrelevant information. I tried to keep it as strict as possible in regards to the competition and people related to the competition.

Mico venturecup, I reverted your edits for a variety of reasons including the addition of an outside image, failing to maintain a neutral point of view and an apparent conflict of interest which you have just confirmed for me. Please note that COI editing is HIGHLY discouraged. --Non-Dropframe talk 14:33, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

HELLO

I recently change a subject on Betrayal just for fun for my friends. I want zo apologies to you for that. I will never make it again. :-) SIDObill (talk) 11:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Docproctor

Why are you messaging me and undoing my episode list for The Debaters? How are my edits "disruptive?" Please explain yourself because I have no idea what you are talking about. The Debaters is the highest rated show on CBC Radio 1, a hit show in Canada. I am adding all episode info for all 9 seasons of this show as I research/find it, which is hours and hours of painstaking work so I don't understand why you keep undoing it. I don't want these current edits to be lost. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docproctor (talk • contribs) 11:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Just saw your other messages. Vandalism? Blocked from editing? What is the problem with all the work I'm putting into this page? I've already added 230+ episode titles and numbers. Working on broadcast dates from CBC's website and debaters' names in each episode but you keep reverting my edits. How does it make sense to keep undoing my edits when I'm trying to add the info you say is missing? This makes no sense to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Docproctor (talk • contribs) 12:03, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

Combs

You do realize that what I added to the Ray Combs is a true fact, correct? 73.208.170.214 (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

73.208.170.214 Something merely being true is not the only benchmark for inclusion in Wikipedia. The information needs to be both notable and include a citation from a verifiable source. --Non-Dropframe talk 16:50, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
Tourette's Guy is notable. Go check him out on YouTube 73.208.170.214 (talk) 05:24, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
73.208.170.214, please read WP:GNG and WP:NBIO to learn about what is and is not considered notable on Wikipedia. Also note that it is up to you to demonstrate the subject's notability with verifiable sources. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:08, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

babe

let it go ... we all know that something is wrong at all the times so why not have a breach in the time-space continuum? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.19.139.240 (talk) 15:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

XBLACKXVIPERX

can someone tell me what exactly , as an example, a CONSTRUCTIVE sentence should be like because APPARENTLY according to user Non-dropframe i'm not writing it right by switching certain details in tech-related articles that i have SOURCES from, i don't just don't make these things up out of thin air you know, the web is full of knowledge and I try to write the most accurate i'm able to find but i'm also not very experienced in writing here and i wrote or CONTRIBUTED to a few articles in the past...now i respect everyone's opinions but we all got ways of doing things and just because one does it 1 way it doesn't mean other ways of putting information (as accurately as possible) its wrong, now yes there are sadly, bad types in the world as well lol....trolls who would do anything to mess up anything but most of us who contribute to public edit websites like wikipedia are very well-intentioned...but since there's so many of us we all got ways of doing things , not just 1 way so please lets help 1 another instead of criticizing how others edit.

XBLACKXVIPERX I've looked and I'm really not sure what you're referring to. Could you point me to the article or diff you're talking about? --Non-Dropframe talk 10:33, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

bogus warnings - Beta Uprising

Please do not place random vandalism templates on my talk page, whilst restoring content which has been deleted in article spacec. did you actually look into what you were doing? When an article is restored for the purpose of DRV, it is restored then blanked then the tempundelete template added. If you look at the history of the article, you will find that this is exactly what the restoring admin, User:DGG did, some other user ignored that and restored the article to full view, I corrected it then you have come along and once again restored the deleted content and accused me of vandalism. Please correct your mistake and remove the bogus warning from my talk page. --86.2.216.5 (talk) 12:17, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

86.2.216.5 Issue fixed. My mistake but your edit summary was very unclear. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:24, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Quick deletion of a page

Hi, Non-dropframe. I just posted a page of a list of lindy hop societies around Spain. My idea is to create a page were all the communities engaged in the promotion of swing daces around the world appear. You suggested the page for being deleted. I am just starting on the wikipedia community and I would like to have more information about why you considered the page for quick deletion and how I could improve it in order to be considered as eligible to you. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubenfe (talk • contribs) 12:10, 4 October 2015 (UTC) --Rubenfe (talk) 12:14, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Rubenfe Hello! The reason I marked the page for deletion is because it doesn't seem to meet the guideline at WP:NOTDIRECTORY. Generally, Wikipedia lists are made up of internal links or "wikilinks." From what I saw on the page, none of the organizations you included currently have a Wikipedia page which suggests none of them are considered notable enough for inclusion and, by extension, the list is also not needed. Let me know if I can explain further. --Non-Dropframe talk 12:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Ok I see! Then you suggest me to try first to add pages for each of the associations and then if they are not deleted the list could be considered as necessary? Thanks! --Rubenfe (talk) 12:32, 4 October 2015 (UTC)
Rubenfe Yes, I think that would be ideal. However, I would very very highly suggest you spend a bit of time getting to know Wikipedia first. For example, go on the Wikipedia Adventure which is a great (and fun!) Wikipedia tutorial which usually takes less than an hour. After that, read WP:FIRSTARTICLE and try submitting an article to Articles for Creation. AfC articles are reviewed by experienced editors who will help you along the way. If I can be of any help please don't hesitate to let me know! --Non-Dropframe talk 13:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I will do so! thanks!--Rubenfe (talk) 13:40, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

YOUTHS ISLAMIC ASSOCIATION

plz give me back my deleted page.. pleeez

SAUD BIN RAJIBULLAH I'm very sorry for the unpleasant experience of having your page deleted. However, it appears your organization does not meet the Wikipedia guidelines for notability at this time. Notability needs to be demonstrated using verifiable references. If I can explain further please let me know. --Non-Dropframe talk 13:45, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

THQ bankruptcy (Midway Games)

Seriously? Is a citation for THQ's bankruptcy really required when readers can just click the link right there and read THQ's article for all the details? If you really want you can just link to THQ#Bankruptcy_and_liquidation I suppose but I don't see why that's such a big requirement. I've thus undone your revert of my edit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.57.15.155 (talk) 13:51, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

I think u made a mistake

Dear dropframe, I have been a student at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Technological University for five years. I don't think there is any wrong to include the hostel names in the university page. Also, the university song is the official one, the links there are all official from the university website. As far as the second part at the page is concerned -- yes it is a contribution by the students to the university-- what's wrong to include that in the University page. Thanks, Do Reply. Chaugule26 (talk) 16:50, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Chaugule26, I reverted your edits as they don't seem to contain information that's particularly notable. If they can be backed up with a {{WP:VERIFY|verifiable source]], that information would be worthy of inclusion. --Non-Dropframe talk 17:04, 4 October 2015 (UTC)


Note

he is notable person plz see the reference and plz do not remove any matter and plz accept article SACHIN G lokapure

117.222.54.118, it's up to the community, not to me individually. I reverted your edit as you removed the AfD template which may not be done until the discussion is closed. --Non-Dropframe talk 17:07, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello, I am trying to delete the page "Robert A. Levine" and only have the page "Robert A. LeVine (note the difference in spelling of the last name). I am not sure how to request to have this page moved? Or how can I request for the first page to be deleted? Please, do let me know. Thank you SwetaraJoshi (talk) 18:21, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Help

Hello, can you reviewing one more time the iHorrordb (Internet Horror Movie Database) page? I inserted new info so I hope it's right. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinhead-69 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Are you sure about reverting that edit?

Remember when you reverted that edit made by an anonymous user "86.191.132.123"? The one on the article about Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets (video game)?I mean, sure, the edit I made was hardly significant, but it must still be constructive and, most importantly, correct, right? Saying that he was voiced by Daniel Radcliffe in the games is just…incorrect. I looked in the PC version's manual, and Tom was clearly credited towards the end.

I'm not one who wants to start a "fierce argument" about this, but I just thought I should clear it up. All in all, I think you made a small mistake in reverting my edit. You see, in Tom Attenborough's article, it clearly states that he Yeah, uh… I'm the user who made that edit. I just forgot to log in, as usual, but didn't notice.

Anyway, the thing is, Harry Potter actually was voiced by Tom Attenborough, rather than Daniel Radcliffe, in the PC game in question. The difference is pretty clear when you compare the two.[2] I might be slightly new to Wikipedia as a registered user, but that doesn't necessarily stop me from correcting a mistake in an article.

I'm sorry to bother you with this, but I wouldn't want the page to display the wrong information.

I hope this isn't too much trouble… BenM64 (talk) 19:15, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

BenM64, Hi there! If I made a mistake please feel free to revert me. If you can, a reference there would be of great use and should help stop changes in the future. Patrolling recent changes is a bit difficult as one is trying to parse vandalism from genuine edits and of course mistakes to get made. My apologies. --Non-Dropframe talk 19:19, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you. I understand. I've corrected the mistake, now, along with a source to back it up. BenM64 (talk) 19:28, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Get a life

Jeez mate do you have any other hobbies like who constantly checks the page for mudflaps like wtf u are probably a wanker Blobfish ggg (talk) 20:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Emídio Brasileiro

My friend, could it help improve this page? Thank's for your attention. 200.103.102.203 (talk) 10:57, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

200.103.102.203 By repeatedly undoing and redoing the same edit over and over again? I don't see how. --Non-Dropframe talk 11:03, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
My friend, I will look for your help. Hugs, William Storn 200.103.102.203 (talk) 12:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
200.103.102.203, I'd be happy to help. What is it you're trying to accomplish? --Non-Dropframe talk 12:25, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

My friend , help not extinguish the page. thank you. 200.103.102.203 (talk) 14:13, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Capitalization

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Capital_letters

Seems constructive and straightforward to me. If I Want To Read Nonsense Capitalized Like This, I'd Go Elsewhere. QED, TL;DR, ETC — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.14.86.178 (talk) 00:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

173.14.86.178 My mistake. Frankly, I don't remember reverting that edit. My sincerest apology. --Non-Dropframe talk 10:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)
  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference codecguide-about was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Attenborough#Voice_acting
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Non-dropframe/Archive_5&oldid=1078661277"