User talk:Kharkiv07/Archives/2016/February

Happy New Year, Kharkiv07!

Happy New Year!

Kharkiv07,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, Kharkiv07!

(Charles R. Knight, 1922)

Kharkiv07, I wish you and those dear to you golden days of love and joy in a Happy New Year 2016! Best regards, Sam Sailor Talk! 23:50, 1 January 2016 (UTC) Pass on! Send this greeting by adding {{subst:User:Sam Sailor/Templates/HappyNewYear}} to user talk pages. Automatic level-2 heading and auto-signing included.

(Unknown artist, Norway, 1916)

WP:PERM Request

After reviewing your request for the "account creator" permission, I have enabled the flag on your account. Keep in mind these things:

• The account creator right removes the limit on the maximum number of new accounts that can be created in a 24-hour period.
• The account creator right is not a status symbol. If it remains unused, it is likely to be removed. Abuse of the account creator right will result in its removal by an administrator.

If you no longer require the right, let me know, or ask any other administrator. Drop a note if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of the account creator right. Happy editing! — xaosflux ^Talk 15:15, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

A message from Ichsumit

sumit 16:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC) sorry for that. and plz tell me that how do i upload my own image in top of the page??

A message from CamponotusLazarus

Hello, Kharkiv07!

Thank you very much for welcoming me to the Wikipedia community, and coaching me about appropriate entries.

I was attempting to build a Bug Bites (2016 TV Series) Wikipedia entry, when I received a cautionary message from you about a possible conflict of interest due to the fact that I was personally associated with the subject matter. That totally makes sense to me, and I respect that someone making a page about their own work potentially detracts from the objectivity and trustworthiness of Wikipedia.

As of last night, there still was a Bug Bites (2016 TV Series) Wikipedia entry, though it had been greatly shortened by you or another administrator, and was preceded by warning about a lack of citation. I was just about to go to the page and add references, but now I see the entry has been removed entirely.

My question to you is this- would you allow me to create a very minimal Bug Bites (2016 TV Series) Wikipedia entry, complete with references AND pending your approval, so that we might have some tiny bit of representation on Wikipedia? Even a placeholder page would allow others to make their own additions, though I believe I could write a tiny bit more than that, and still meet your standards for objectivity. I am a scientist, and understand the importance of that. Bug Bites is a children's science show that will soon be broadcast in the US, and then in numerous countries around the world. If you are interested, here is our website, which launched yesterday: www.bugbiteskids.com

If you permit me to make a small entry, I will do my best to limit all information to that which can be linked to an external reference.

Many thanks for your time! Happy new year.

Adam CamponotusLazarus (talk) 19:01, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi CamponotusLazarus. To preface I haven't been involved at all with your article up to this point, but after taking a quick look it looks like several editors are concerned that it doesn't meet Wikipedia's notability policies. The best advice I can give is to read Wikipedia:Your first article, and once you think that you can make an article that meets all of the criterion, try the article wizard, which will allow established editors to give you advice on your article and how you can improve it before it's published. If you have any questions when writing, you can leave me a message here, or check out the teahouse. Happy editing! Kharkiv07 (T) 19:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

Post-CVUA

After a long period of evaluation regarding your counter-vandalism work, not just at your Counter-vandalism unit academy page, but also in your contributions, I have come to the conclusion that it is most likely unwise for an admin to grant you the rollbacker right. This stems from you not being able to adapt to many a policy, nor heeding my markings, and the general lack of improvement. I also think that the quality of your work has gone down with STiki, which worries me when we're talking about Huggle and rollback, which are both much more potent tools. I have conferred with some administrators, and in general they're in agreement with me. Thus, I don't believe that you will be able to finish the CVUA curriculum, perhaps this is the failure of me as the instructor, but I won't be continuing your training. If you believe you can handle rollback, feel free to go to request for permissions and request it. If an evaluating admin wishes for more of my opinions, please email me. Thank you for your work, and I hope to see you around.

— Kharkiv07 (T) 23:56, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Kharkiv07, I appreciate your efforts in my CVUA training. However, I have noticed that the main concern is that I am unable to distinguish between good faith and bad faith edits. Before you delist me from the academy, please re-consider my activity based on the fact that Stiki only allows me to explicitly specify a reason for each revert in the message only if I mark it as good faith, which I arbitrarily did as I thought the user's contributions made sense but only did not feel appropriate for the context in which I saw the edit, as not the entire article is shown, making it difficult to determine whether the edit was appropriate or not.

If you are really unwilling to proceed onwards with my training, I understand. In that case, would you please delist me and MarkYabloko from the CVUA trainer list; that way you can free up time for handle new users like Giooo95. Thanking you kindly for your time and best wishes for the new year. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 21:19, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

P.S. Would it be possible to have Titodutta, the only other active CVUA trainer on the list, who has admin rights and whose recent training of Eteethan and The StormCatcher was successful in that they now have rollback rights and are fully taking advantage of it (using tools like Huggle), take over my CVUA? Regards, <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 00:17, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Hi, when making mass-changes to tables such as this, please use the preview function and check the spacing before saving. Thanks. - ^theWOLFchild 20:27, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:04, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Kharkiv07. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 16:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—^cyberpower_{Chat:Limited Access} 16:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your support

	Peacemaker67 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating and supporting at my RfA. It was very much appreciated, and I am humbled that the community saw fit to trust me with the tools. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 04:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

A message from Antonyahu

Do You have page in UKrainian WiKI? Antonyahu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 6 February 2016 (UTC)