Talk:John Hinckley Jr./Archive 2006
 |
Republican parents?
I've reverted the edit that creates the phrase "Republican parents." I mention it here only because User:Golbez reverted essentially this same edit by User:132.241.245.49 about twenty-four hours ago, so it seems that the latter particularly wants it in this article. I admit that I can strictly argue only that the inclusion of "Republican" is irrelevant, not POV. That is, it feels POV; it sounds like it's trying to cast some kind of aspersion of conspiracy, but I don't get it exactly. The suspicious word was the most recent edit, so it doesn't have a long period of tacit peer approval, and that convinced me to re-revert. If Hinckley's parents are truly Republican and someone can write additional text that puts that fact in meaningful context, then this would be appropriate for inclusion in the article, I suppose. --Officiallyover 11:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC) I agree with Officiallyover that it would be best if more info was provided on his parents. 132.241.245.49 21:38, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
Reagans wounds
Inconsistency - one paragraph says Reagan was hit in the leg with a ricochet bullet. Then later it is mentioned he was seriously wounded by a riochet bullet in the chest? Which is correct? 203.23.122.202 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.23.122.202 (talk) 03:57, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
why
Why does this article have a controversial tag, having conspiracy theorists abound doesn't make it controversial Khukri 13:18, 27 March 2006 (UTC)