Talk:4-hydroxybenzoate 3-monooxygenase

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Arago2, Jgmurphy102, Adbates. Peer reviewers: Snodgrah, Arvin Sookezian, Hertzogje.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:07, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Article Evaluation[edit]

Article is vague and missing pertinent information on this enzyme. It is missing structures (both of enzyme and catalytic reagents/intermediates), reaction mechanism scheme, and information on the active site and other relevant amino acid residues. Each fact is not referenced within the article, although references listed at the end are from reputable journals. Jgmurphy102 (talk) 02:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article missing a lot of important information. Images of the enzyme from Pymol or similar software needed. Unnecessary to show the basic reaction scheme then list the reagents and products. Section on structural studies needs an update (from 2007). Needs a section on the enzyme's catalytic mechanism. Adbates (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Article gives no information for role of FAD other than the fact that it functions as a cofactor. Also, '4 substrates' looks much less professional than 'four substrates,' along with the few typos in the nomenclature section, bring down the quality of the article. There is also nothing listed under the references section (and nothing is cited), despite the fact that there are references listed under the further reading section. The entire article needs an overhaul. Arago2 (talk) 03:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]