Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2009/April/11

April 11[edit]

{{Int-org-stub}} → {{International-org-stub}}[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was redirected

We have {{International-dev-stub}}, {{International-law-stub}}, {{International-trade-stub}}... and {{int-org-stub}}. For uniformity's sake, this one should be brought into line. Keeping a redirect from the current name wouldn't be a problem, but the main name should be like the others. Grutness...wha? 00:09, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

per WP:BEBOLD, I went ahead and just did it. This page is really more for deletions, not moves. — BQZip01 — ^talk 21:06, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please read the part of WP:BEBOLD which says that it is for articles but that more care needs to be taken with templates and categories! I brought it here because it is quite feasible that someone would have said that it was better to change the other three, or that the redirect created by such a move should be deleted. Also please read the details at the top of this page under "About this page". It is standard practice to bring such proposed changes to SFD, which works is subtly different ways to other xFD process pages. Grutness...wha? 03:24, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Fair enough. I agree with the guidance that "more care" needs to be taken, but in this case, there shouldn't be any far-reaching consequences. If it is interfering with anything please revert the changes immediately. I didn't take this decision lightly; I considered the ramifications of such a change and opted to be bold. I agree that this is certainly a place for moves, but my point was that it is more geared towards deletions than moves. Sorry if I wasn't more clear. — BQZip01 — ^talk 03:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - I doubt there's any problem in this particular case. It was more of heads-up that -despite the pages title - renames are generally handled here too (even seemingly straightforward ones). Grutness...wha? 23:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - :-) — BQZip01 — ^talk 00:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.