Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Journalism/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Portal:Journalism[edit]

Hello portal peer reviewers. Portal:Journalism has (11) Selected articles, all of WP:FA or WP:GA status, (13) Selected biographies, all of WP:FA or WP:GA status, (30) Selected pictures, all free-use, (20) Did you know entries, all that have appeared on the Main Page, and (58) Selected quotes, of which 42 have an accompanying free-use picture. All of the above-mentioned sections use {{Random portal component}}. Would appreciate general feedback on the portal, as well as comments on how to further improve its quality. Cirt (talk) 05:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]

  • Comments. It all looks fine to me.
    • The biggest gripe I can come up with is that featured star is so big everywhere you put it! ;-) RichardF (talk) 13:03, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Done - Reduced featured star size by half. Cirt (talk) 13:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
    • DYK & Selected quotes edit links should go to the displayed content, not the archive pages. RichardF (talk) 18:14, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      •  Done. Fixed this for the Selected quotes section. Don't think this is necessary for the DYK section, other portals got to Featured Portal status with the current style of formatting. As there are several displayed quotes, which each have separate randomized functions, it would be difficult to do this. Cirt (talk) 18:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
  • Review: Looks good!
Response to review
  •  Done - Addressed all points from above, except for :
  • Here — {| width="100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="background: gainsboro; border-style:solid; border-width:2px; border-color: steelblue; "class="plainlinks" could be added.
  • Not sure what this coding does, perhaps you can add it for me, and also explain what it's for? Cirt (talk) 02:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC).[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.