Wikipedia:Peer review/Ralph Nader/archive1

Ralph Nader[edit]

Already a good article, but is it good enough to be featured? If not, Why? 11kowrom 23:55, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe a userbox may make it better.--Andeh 07:03, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you mean an infobox? As for the article, there are too many lists and short sections. Talk about his involvement in the most important organizations, mention his involvement in a few others, and ditch the rest. Combine 1972, 1990, 1992 and 1996. Do general cleanup. Add more citations. --Spangineer^[es] (háblame) 15:32, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]