Wikipedia:Peer review/Placenta/archive1

Placenta

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because... this article isn't perfect, but I'd like to eventually get it to GA. I haven't edited this particular article much, and would like the input of other users on what areas need work to get it there, as it is sometimes easier to have a definitive list. Specific, definite and "actionable" points would be most appreciated.

• Ping to Flyer22, who has worked with me in the past on these reproductive system-related articles.

Thanks, LT910001 (talk) 10:23, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Comments from Tezero

• The article seems biased towards human placentas.
• Is there a source for the statement about the two plurals of the word "placenta"?
• Lots of short paragraphs around. Also short sections that may be better off merged together if expansion is not possible.
• Some unsourced statements as well.
• "Structure" in particular seems wanting of expansion.
• Similarly, "Clinical significance" should be retitled to something more representative of its contents, and should also be significantly expanded with regards to each disease mentioned.

Tezero (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. I'll try and get to these in the next week or so. --LT910001 (talk) 21:03, 15 April 2014 (UTC)