Wikipedia:Peer review/Blood+/archive1

Blood+[edit]

I've listed this article for peer review because significant work has been done in the article over the last view weeks and I think it has been significantly improved (see [1] for what it was like before). I'd like to get feedback on other potential improvements to be made and to see if it is ready to go from Start to B class as part of the over all goal of GA or Featured status later.

Thanks,

Collectonian (talk) 05:41, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 01:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

Ideas if you go for GA.

Include the manga, light novels, and video games in the infobox.
Genres should be alphabetized
If possible, find an image of just the logo to put in the infobox.
Make sure the lead section conform with guidelines at WP:Lead.
Article needs a reception section.
A slimmed down version of the major characters should be added to the character section of the main article.
Add a subsection in the character section named "Character types".
Found 9 red links. Consider making stubs for them or removing the link.
Some words used in the article are in the guideline Words to avoid.

(Duane543 (talk) 16:18, 27 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Thanks! Will work on those items. Collectonian (talk) 16:43, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]