Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sausage biscuit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sausage biscuit[edit]

A sausage biscuit
Reason
Seconded at peer review by Nelro.
Articles this image appears in
Sausage biscuit, Breakfast sandwich
Creator
Renee Comet (USDA)
Nominator
ShadowHalo
  • SupportShadowHalo 06:16, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Overexposed, artifacts. --Tewy 06:37, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Exposure looks perfect to me. Just the right amount of accent white. Also I didn't notice any artifacts. Fg2 07:40, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • The exposure looks pretty good to be too, but look at the bottom - the white areas fade into the artificial background and it is difficult to see the definition of the biscuit. Also, it looks a bit 'overcooked' (no pun intended) - there are some definite dithering and posterization issues in the detail. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 08:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I'll defer to the experts here. Fg2 09:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I do see what you mean about the bottom blending in with the white background (which I presume is a light table). Fg2 10:41, 15 March 2007 (UTC) But at full res, it looks distinct. Fg2 10:42, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -Nelro 10:31, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Illustrates the subject in question, but is not among Wikipedia's best work in my opinion (and it doesn't make me want to eat a sausage biscuit).-Wutschwlllm 13:20, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Not enough background contrast. posterization. -Fcb981 22:55, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose E4T4A2 I realize the fact that this thing looks extremely unappetizing actually enhances the enc of the picture, but still, yuck. ~ trialsanderrors 03:23, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- Yuck. It makes people avoid eating a sausage biscuit instead of wanting to eat one. ~~Eugene2x Sign here ~~ 01:56, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. High-quality shot and it really does look quite tasty. Don't know what everyone else is talking about --frotht 13:08, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 07:47, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]