Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/René Auberjonois

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Portrait of René Auberjonois[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jan 2016 at 22:39:49 (UTC)

Original – American actor, singer and director René Auberjonois
Reason
I came across this a few days ago and wondered if it met the FP criteria. Then after seeing the photographer has other works already at FP, I felt confident enough to nominate. From the looks of things, this seems to have a bit of a modification history with editors lightening/darkening it, but the current version is certainly the best of the bunch. Miyagawa (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Articles in which this image appears
René Auberjonois
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Entertainment
Creator
Kyle Cassidy, tidied by Hohum
  • Support as nominatorMiyagawa (talk) 22:39, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regretful oppose - The shot is good, but the vignetting is a bit too much for me. (Side note: Having only seen him as Odo, seeing his face with so many wrinkles is a bit of a shock) — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:26, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • It's mainly the background, though. I think it could be edited, but those weird colour haloes could probably benefit from a filter. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      • The vignetting goes over his shirt as well. It's obviously deliberate, but I can't get behind it. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 01:46, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Nice portrait. – Yann (talk) 11:00, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – Per Chris. Halos are hokey. Besides which, shadowing on subject's face is excessive and looks fakey. Sca (talk) 16:17, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • SupportJobas (talk) 19:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose – More for the shadowing on the face than the vignetting - Wolftick (talk) 21:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 23:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]