Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Olga San Juan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Olga San Juan[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2021 at 01:32:09 (UTC)

OriginalFilm still of Olga San Juan from Variety Girl, 1947
Reason
Reasonably hi-res film still in the public domain (see commons:Template:PD-US-no notice/Commons:Hirtle chart) that provides helpful context for Olga San Juan.
Articles in which this image appears
Olga San Juan
FP category for this image
People/Entertainment
Creator
Mal Bulloch (Q109335505) (photographer); User:AleatoryPonderings (uploader)
  • Support as nominatorAleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 01:32, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:44, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – It doesn't meet the 1500 pixel requirement of FP criterion #2. Exceptions can be made for historical images, but Hollywood actors and actresses are well (often) photographed, so I doubt a convincing argument can be made for an exception. The image needs a bit of touchup to remove the ID in the lower right corner. Bammesk (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    • If 1500px is a hard limit, I guess this is an automatic fail. Should've read the criteria more closely. Suppose I could buy this from the Ebay page and scan it to a higher res … a bargain at US$18! AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 03:05, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 1500px requirement is pretty firm, with occasional exceptions. I am not sure buying it and scanning it will guarantee the nom's success. There is no way to predict what the reviewers do at FP noms. And I have been around for a long time :-) Bammesk (talk) 03:29, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – Yet another promotional publicity image (with blown highlights). – Sca (talk) 13:00, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment – I would definitely support a higher resolution. Yann (talk) 21:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 11:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]