Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Dggst

Doggy style [edit]

Image:Dggst.jpg - I delinked it to make the page work friendly. Broken S 02:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I found this image when reading about it on ANI. It was uploaded by User:Paeris and I think it's beautiful. I like the female's light tan over her shoulders, then as we move into the more private areas, she becomes milky white; then we see her fine buttocks that hide the penetration of the penis.

Nominate and support. - Anittas 09:50, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment unclear licensing, the pic is up for deletion. Also not really stunning, apart from the vast amount of skin visible. --Dschwen 10:06, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Kids, can you say WP:POINT? I knew you could! --Calton | Talk 13:23, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~, er, oppose. Hedley 14:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. You are kidding me. LOL! __earth 14:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Nothing outstanding. Arousing? Maybe. __earth 07:30, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You are joking, right? Somebody get an admin in here to delete this. Are you seriously suggesting that we say 'Oh yes, here are the finest pictures in an encyclopedia. Oh look - some porn! That got loads of votes!'. Strong Oppose. —Vanderdecken∴∫ξ φ 18:42, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again *yawn* ~ Veledan • Talk 22:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You can take the following reasons in any order:

The liscense is ineligable at the moment,
The subject matter is controversial,
This is not the Porno Portal, and
I personally find this offensive. TomStar81 00:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose due to copyright issues. Zach (Sound Off) 00:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Very good promotion but it isn't the style of wikipedia. Chooserr 01:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not a very good photo stylistically. WP:POINT seems to be the order of the day. FCYTravis 02:19, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - per FCYTravis. It's not hard to find a better illustration of the position; this photo doesn't illustrate much. -GTBacchus^(talk) 02:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Okay, so far we concluded these two things:

The photo is copyrighted;
We can have a better photo of that position;

So my question is: who will volunteer? --Anittas 02:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's just not a very good picture. ~MDD4696 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Not promoted Broken S 04:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]