Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums from the 2010s (UK)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 17:30, 11 January 2010 [1].

List of number-one albums from the 2010s (UK)[edit]

Nominator(s): Loveable Daveo (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums from the 2010s (UK)/archive1

I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it meets the criteria. Although short, it will extend as time passes, without changing the current design/layout of the article. It is incomplete, but the only new information to be added will be the future number-one albums and current top 10, which will be added after they are revealed every Sunday. Many other similar lists have been given featured list status when still incomplete, such as List of number-one singles from the 2000s (UK) Loveable Daveo (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose There has only been 1 number-one album in the 2010s. It's vastly premature to say that this is an example of WP's finest work. Bencherlite ^Talk 21:19, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Further comment) List of number-one singles from the 2000s (UK) was promoted in Feb 2009, so over 90% of the decade was over by that point. 2/520ths (to use Reywas's figures) is a completely different order of magnitude. Bencherlite ^Talk 22:32, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Oppose. We're only two weeks into a decade of 520. Although I'm generally an advocate for short lists, this one is much too premature. It will surely and steadily grow and perhaps be great in at least a few months. Reywas92^Talk 22:14, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. A list of something ongoing is one thing, but this is just silly. Staxringold _talk^contribs 05:42, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - there is no reason for the current top 10 to even be in there, and removing that just leaves a list with one entry, which is obviously far too short for a FL -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.