Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best R&B Album/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:08, 30 June 2011 [1].

Grammy Award for Best R&B Album[edit]

Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best R&B Album/archive1

Nominator(s): Crystal Clear x3 02:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list (again) because I believe it meets the criteria. Crystal Clear x3 02:33, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:22, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments didn't see this nominated before..?

Four lead paras is a little excessive.
"Award recipients included " include - it's still current, right?
Just for You is a dab link.
Boyz II Men caption needs a full stop.
Fanmail -> FanMail.
Sisqo is missing a diacritic.
Isley Brothers -> The Isley Brothers.
Blige caption needs a full stop.
Benet missing a diacritic.
No need for Category:Grammy Awards since you have a more specific Category:Grammy Awards for rhythm and blues.

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:33, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have adressed all of your concerns. Crystal Clear x3 22:07, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – This user already has an active nomination at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Grammy Award for Best Long Form Music Video/archive1, which has one support at the moment. The FLC instructions say that "Users should not add a second FL nomination nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed." Is one support really substantial? I'm not certain that it is. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:25, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair point, I hadn't noticed that. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:25, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: This list looks pretty good. I support its promotion to FL status assuming the concerns of all other reviewers are addressed. Good work! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:: I don't believe it's necessary to have two U.S flags. Also the Seattle Times Newspaper should be linked along with it's publisher.--Blackjacks101 (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done Crystal Clear x3 02:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Another great addition to the Grammy lists well done!--Blackjacks101 (talk) 11:59, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I couldn't find anything wrong with it. That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 16:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.