Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Elimination Chamber/archive1

Elimination Chamber[edit]

Good pictures, great, well layed out tables, clear, concise information and a good, if somewhat lengthy, introduction. What more could a good article need?

Oppose Firstly, inline citations (see WP:CITE), and secondly content beyond the intro which is not a list or table. Mak emi 19:21, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Per Wikipedia:What is a featured article? article needs references, article needs sources. Article is currently a long lead with a bunch of lists. --Ataricodfish 19:22, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but i have to agree (Object). This article will never be considered a featured article (as it stands.) I would suggest you put it up for peer review before suggesting it for a featured article... even putting it up for a good article candidate would be more realiastic --- Paulley 19:23, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object – I can't figure out if this is an article or list. To answer your question, there's a lot that is needed. WP:WIAFA should answer that. Begin with references. Regards, =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The writing isn't too good...there aren't many transitions, so it doesn't read well. I'd have to agree with the above comments-too many bullet points. The charts are ok thoughOsbus 02:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object - Lead is too long, article contains almost no prose at all. Fieari 19:14, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object +Prose, -Lists, +References, and then you'll have a much more FA-style article. Staxringold 22:56, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object As a member of WP:PW, I have to admit this article is far from a featured article and there's more professional wrestling articles more deserving than this one. As said before, it's mostly a list of previous matches. --Oakster 17:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]