User talk:Zoomheroxdpro

Threads (social network)[edit]

Please don't post numbers out of thin air. They may be reached at one point, but the article needs references (see the little footnotes) to support the updated numbers. –Pippinitis (talk) 02:13, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for putting in better effort, but Cryptosaurus Networks may not necessarily be considered a reliable source. Some of these obscure sites are jumping the gun and posting numbers not consistent with https://www.quiverquant.com/threadstracker/ —Pippinitis (talk) 02:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem[edit]

Hello, I'm Worldbruce. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. The image File:Sheikh-hasina-image2023.jpg that you uploaded appears to be copyrighted content borrowed from another website. If you are the copyright holder and would like to use this image on Wikipedia, please follow the instructions given at WP:DONATEIMAGE. This will start the process to get an OTRS ticket in place on the item proving that Wikipedia has permission to use it. The image should be uploaded to Commons, not directly to Wikipedia, so you will need to open a user account on that wiki as well. This may sound complex, but hopefully if you take it step by step it will go smoothly. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! --Worldbruce (talk) 06:13, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro,

Please stop moving pages involving Twitter around the project to different titles. All of your page moves have been reverted. Please occupy yourself with editing other subjects. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro,

You are still moving around pages involving Twitter, all of which have been reverted. Please stop this. There are 6 million other articles you can work on improving. If you ignore this warning too, you are headed towards a loss of editing privileges for disruptive editing. If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tech burner moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Tech burner. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 18:08, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Threads (social network), without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 09:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kotha (social network) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Kotha (social network). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and needs additional content such as History, Notable people, and Awards (if any) presented in Encyclopedia format.. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JoeNMLC (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits on Sylhet[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. UserNumber (talk) 15:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Triggered insaan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Triggered insaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:2150:2D23:CC07:12FF:FEF2:EAD9 (talk) 07:00, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 08:09, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fukra Insaan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fukra Insaan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fukra Insaan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deauthorized. ^(talk) 17:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Elim Chowdhury[edit]

The article Elim Chowdhury has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Os ari us 10:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Elim Chowdhury moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Elim Chowdhury. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BangJan1999 16:51, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Afghanistan cricket flag[edit]

It appears you have made an erroneous but good faith edit when placing the flag of the Taliban as the flag used to represent the Afghanistan Cricket Team, this is not used internationally and should not be used on the article. 67.149.160.101 (talk) 15:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moskapur moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Moskapur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 20:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Moskapur moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Moskapur, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 20:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waze isn't RS because it's user-generated. – dudhhr^talk _contribs (he/they) 20:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Istihad Ahmed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Istihad Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A00:23EE:1478:6AAC:D41C:52FF:FE2C:4707 (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fukra Insaan[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fukra Insaan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abhishek Malhan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. BangJan1999 16:10, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Istihad Ahmed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Istihad Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:42, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator ^(talk) 12:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Istihad Ahmed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Istihad Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Qcne (talk) 13:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Seckends. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Boob have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Seckends (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Muharibollah moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Muharibollah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and hardly any content and no categories. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Muharibollah[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Muharibollah requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to Murad IV. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 00:18, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Smile 2 Jannah. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Annh07 (talk) 15:06, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. Fermiboson (talk) 15:29, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Smile 2 Jannah. Annh07 (talk) 16:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 19:57, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Istihad Ahmed[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Istihad Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Annh07 (talk) 14:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Smile 2 Jannah for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Smile 2 Jannah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smile 2 Jannah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fermiboson (talk) 14:56, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop moving pages[edit]

Don't move pages based on your will. Beshogur (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoomheroxdpro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am active on Wikipedia and there are many things I see need to be edited or many content not available like jayforpur village etc.Zoomheroxdpro (talk) 18:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:55, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoomheroxdpro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

please kindly unblock me I know my fault and Iam sorry about it the block is no longer necessary because i understand what i have been blocked for and I will not continue to cause damage or disruption and I will make useful contributions instead. And I will not make any Wrong. I request to kindly unblock me.Zoomheroxdpro (talk) 19:48, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoomheroxdpro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia administrators I wrote on my Wikipedia account that I appealed and asked that it be reinstated. I understand the importance of maintaining a constructive and collaborative community on Wikipedia, and I am committed to maintaining the site's structure going forward.I acknowledge that I have been blocked due to [indicate reason for blocking] therefore, I wanted to express my understanding of the situation. It took time to reflect on my actions and their potential impact on the Wikipedia community. I am committed to correcting any mistakes caused by my previous contributions.Moving forward, I assure you that I am only committed to contributing to the best and most constructive Wikipedia. I am familiar with site guidelines and policies to better understand local standards. I look forward to contributing valuable content, respectfully discussing it, and working closely with other Wikipedia users.I truly believe that blocking is not necessary to prevent the destruction or destruction of Wikipedia. I am determined to learn from my past mistakes and contribute in a manner consistent with Wikipedia principles.I kindly ask that you review my request and consider uninstalling my account. I appreciate your time and thoughts on this. Zoomheroxdpro (talk) 20:17, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Do not use AI chatbots. We want to hear from you, not from a chatbot. Yamla (talk) 20:43, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Moved to bottom. Tip: using an AI chat generator to write your unblock request will not be looked on favorably. Schazjmd (talk) 20:36, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoomheroxdpro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked by a User for disruptive editing on the article. I admit that I made some mistakes and violated the Wikipedia policies, but I did not intend to cause any harm or damage to the encyclopedia. I have read the relevant policies and guidelines, and I understand why my edits were problematic. I apologize for my actions and I promise to be more careful and constructive in the future. I hope you will consider giving me another chance to contribute to Wikipedia. I have requested to many times . Sir please unblock me. I will no do any wrong.Thank you for your time and attention.Zoomheroxdpro (talk) 20:53, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since you understand why your edits were problematic, please tell us how in order to demonstrate your understanding. You also don't describe the edits you will make. 331dot (talk) 23:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zoomheroxdpro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will describe what I edit and I promise you this mistake will not happen again . And without any reason I will not edit anything . Please I request you to unblock me . Please unblock I have requested so many times 😞 🙏🏻 Zoomheroxdpro (talk) 23:35, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This so poorly written as to border on incomprehensible and does not address the reason for your block. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:00, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That you did not describe your edits is not the only reason you were blocked. 331dot (talk) 10:57, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tech Burner[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tech Burner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Elim Chowdhury[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Elim Chowdhury, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Moskapur[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Moskapur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kotha (social network)[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kotha (social network), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tech Burner[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tech Burner".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:45, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Moskapur[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moskapur".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:43, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Muharibollah[edit]

Hello, Zoomheroxdpro. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Muharibollah, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]