User talk:YoloMc8562

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, YoloMc8562! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 22:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Page protection[edit]

I saw that you tried to protect the page SummerSlam (2023) by adding the page protection template. However, only admins can add the template as that template does nothing without admin approval. If you feel a page needs protected, you have to request it at WP:RFPP. JDC808 ♫ 01:45, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@JDC808 ah ok thanks, will now know for next time. YoloMc8562 (talk) 03:39, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timelines[edit]

Hi there! I understand that some group timelines include title reigns, but most groups do not and, in my opinion, should only be included if it’s necessary/notable. We should stick to one style for timelines, and since most do not include title reigns, it is best to omit them. See WP:PW/SG for our style guide, in which we don’t mention title reigns in timelines, but that doesn’t stop from discussing it at WT:PW. As for the colors, it is best to make sure the colors are visible. I changed the “leader” color to yellow so that it is visible compared to the dark purple (this is the same reason why we refrain from using both red and green colors for colorblindness). Thanks! Sekyaw (talk) 16:17, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Sekyaw Hi, thanks for taking the time to write a message here, I do see your point, but I do feel that listing the title reigns on the timeline is important, due to the fact the page has a section about the group's championship pursuits. Also about the leader colour, in my opinion, I think it should stay as purple due to the fact thats the colour that many people identify them with, as it is also the groups signature colour (i.e. their lighting is purple, their titantrons are purple, even most of their attires/JD merch has some element of purple). Because of this, I have reverted the Judgment Day article back to my edit of it. However if you do believe your changes should stay in effect, I would be willing to hear any further reasons as to why.
Thanks. YoloMc8562 (talk) 17:05, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’ve started a discussion on the project talk page about the timelines. Would love if you could voice your opinion on it. Thanks Sekyaw (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

JD in JD[edit]

You want a source, fair enough...as per WWE.com, they say Judgment Day will be facing Rollins and crew at War Games. Not Judgment Day and JD McDonagh - just The Judgment Day, period. So WWE considers him as part of the group, and since it is their group, it's their call. Vjmlhds (talk) 05:04, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus, chill out. Anyway it seems WWE are split on this whole thing, because there's sources that suggest he isn't in the group and obviously sources such as that one that do consider him in the group. I think for now just leave it as it is until they out right confirm on TV that he is part of the group. YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:10, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why are you telling me to chill out? I'm not being argumentative, just doing what you asked and providing a source. If WWE themselves say he's in, than he's in as at the end of the day it is their group, so their word is law. Outside sources can't dictate how WWE defines their groups, because they're not theirs to do so. Vjmlhds (talk) 05:14, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Mhm, WWE sources override other sources because well, it's WWE saying stuff. YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, just seen on WWE's official website they just posted about the Men's War Games match (https://www.wwe.com/survivor-series-2023/mens-wargames-match) and as @StrangerMan123 said on the SS 2023 wiki page, on the fourth paragraph, it states "The Judgment Day will be joined by JD McDonagh, who hopes to officially join the group after helping them week after week but also hindering them on occasions, too.", which means that he's not an official member of the group as of yet. YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:21, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fair being fair if WWE says different things out of each side of their mouth, than it really does muddy up the water. This kinda goes into more detail, so for the sake of staying true to my word, if this is WWE's official take, then so be it, and I stand down. No hard feelings. Vjmlhds (talk) 05:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, sorry if I told you to chill out earlier, yeah WWE are kinda weird when it comes to this stuff, they will suggest both sides of something then take ages to confirm which one it is haha. Anyway, hope you have a great rest of your day, no hard feelings from me either! YoloMc8562 (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So NOW JD is officially in...I swear someone at WWE reads Wikipedia. Vjmlhds (talk) 04:22, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah haha, JD's been an associate since August and now they make him a member? About damn time lol. YoloMc8562 (talk) 04:24, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds like with Drew McIntyre, he isn't joining the group outright so much as it is an "I'll scratch your back if you scratch mine" deal...he helped them retain the tag straps, and in return, they'll help him win the World title from Seth Rollins when the rematch comes around. Completely different situation than with JD. JD was straight up trying to join the group, while Drew is just making the proverbial "deal with the devil". Vjmlhds (talk) 18:40, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah JD was just the Sami Zayn of the Judgment Day except without the comedy, like he just kinda stuck around until they eventually welcomed in (yes ik Sami never officially joined the Bloodline but u get my point), also yeah with Drew either he will join the group or he's just around for the WarGames match, either way, Drew's my favourite wrestler so I'm happy with both. YoloMc8562 (talk) 20:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think he's joining the group so much as it is Drew did them a solid, so now they owe him one. Vjmlhds (talk) 23:28, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline colours[edit]

Please stop reverting the colours on timelines. As explained to you, there [a consensus not to do that], the colours introduce accessibility issues for those who are colour blind, and what other articles do is irrelevant - them being wrong doesn't mean the Judgement Day doesn't need to be wrong, too. Please stop edit warring. — Czello (music) 08:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean they're not "wrong", there's no source which dictates how group timelines should be. The link you've given is just a discussion on what you and a few others think how group timelines should be done, it's not an actual source that says how you should do things. it's just a case of we both think different things, also, this colour blind thing, with all due respect, isn't exactly accurate as there's a key on every group timeline for what the colour means, so the colour blind thing isn't an issue. Also, on the discussion, colours that should be used can't even be decided, with some users suggesting black, blue and yellow and you using black, red and green.
Either way, thanks for the message here, let me know if you have anything you'd like to add. YoloMc8562 (talk) 08:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Consensus is decided by group discussion - "just a discussion" is what leads to consensus, especially given that it's at the Wikiproject. Ultimately, there's no good reason why we should theme timelines around in-universe things. And yes, colour blind people can find it difficult to make out the difference between certain colours, even with a key (especially on the Judgement Day article where there's lots of dark colours). — Czello (music) 08:39, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but once again, its just people's opinions vs. other people's opinions, it holds the exact same value. YoloMc8562 (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's not how Wikipedia works. See WP:CONSENSUS. This isn't a free-for-all. — Czello (music) 08:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Czello my point is I could just go and voice why I think the colours should stay, also if you're really bothered about changing it then go ahead and do it on every group, they're either all okay or none of them are okay. YoloMc8562 (talk) 09:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I already have changed it for other groups. And again, other groups being wrong doesn't mean they all should be wrong - we fix them where we find them. And yes, if you want to make a case for why we should have themed colour schemes you will need to actually get a consensus saying so. — Czello (music) 09:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Czello I mean I'm okay with it if all the groups are changed, that was my point, if you want them to be changed, you gotta change all of them because they've either all gotta change or leave all of them. YoloMc8562 (talk) 09:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Rumble protection request[edit]

Thank you for requesting protection to the Royal Rumble article. Zippo9310 (talk) 19:53, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ANI[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Czello (music) 10:04, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:YoloMc8562/sandbox[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:YoloMc8562/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:YoloMc8562[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:YoloMc8562 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

See WP:ANI discussion, currently at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#WP:WEBHOST_violations. --Yamla (talk) 16:52, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

bro what the hell why did I get blocked I thought this was over YoloMc8562 (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You continued to blatantly violate WP:NOTWEBHOST. You even agreed not to do so: "I mean since I'm clearly not gonna be able to put it back on Wikipedia then I guess lol". --Yamla (talk) 17:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah then someone suggested I use the subpages so I did that, also why is it a permanent block I do other stuff then my own pages lol YoloMc8562 (talk) 17:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You were very clearly told this content would not be appropriate on a subpage. You are blocked indefinitely because you promised not to put this content back on Wikipedia and then blatantly violated your promise. You will be unblocked if you can convince a reviewing administrator that you won't and, unlike the previous time you said you wouldn't, you clearly understand and mean it this time. WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 17:05, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok can I not just be blocked from my user page only? YoloMc8562 (talk) 17:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. There are serious concerns with your ability to listen (WP:IDHT) and your ability to understand (WP:CIR) what you are told. --Yamla (talk) 17:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean "serious" concerns its not like I'm committing any crimes lol YoloMc8562 (talk) 19:21, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:AFYE#Working with other editors. To be unblocked, editors are asking you to understand and follow the guidance in WP:NOTWEBHOST. — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 19:49, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah I understand it and that Wikipedia isn't supposed to be used as a blog or social media etc. It's meant to be used as encyclopedia, well your user page anyway. YoloMc8562 (talk) 20:47, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Wait where did I explicitly promise to not put it back on Wikipedia? YoloMc8562 (talk) 15:41, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"I mean since I'm clearly not gonna be able to put it back on Wikipedia then I guess lol" --Yamla (talk) 16:11, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a promise lmao YoloMc8562 (talk) 17:15, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If you are saying we cannot trust you to do what you say, that's fine. It significantly hurts any possibility of a future unblock, though. --Yamla (talk) 17:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late response, but what? I just looked back to the original discussion, and the phrase you quoted has nothing to do with me promising anything, its in response to @Waggers comment about how discussing another website (Miraheze) is bad, he then asks if we can close this thread to which is where I reply with said phrase. Either way, is there any way I can appeal for an unblock, or get unblocked? I want to continue to edit on here and I promise to not use my user page as a personal blog or website, and not violate Wikipedia:NOTWEBHOST. YoloMc8562 (talk) 23:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
WP:GAB explains how to contest your block. --Yamla (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yamla I made a request below YoloMc8562 (talk) 10:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

YoloMc8562 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because I was using my userpage as a personal blog/website, I honestly did not know that it was against the rules, as I just thought you could do pretty much whatever on your user page. But I was wrong and didn't read the rules, which was my mistake. I am requesting an unblock because I am now familiar with the rules and I can absolutely promise it will never happen again.

Accept reason:

per user's assurances. Welcome back -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 00:41, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

YoloMc8562 (talk) 16:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • User:Yamla, the blocking admin, is on vacation until Feb 22 and says no need to consult me priorto lifting one of my blocks on their user page — BillHPike (talk, contribs) 07:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    So in other words, I'm blocked until for another 8 days no matter what?... YoloMc8562 (talk) 11:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:YoloMc8562&oldid=1207505960"