User talk:Wikiecam

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Time travel, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. –CWenger (^ • @) 02:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but we haven't invented a time machine, so no "evidence" is reliable. Wikiecam (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Frenzyland[edit]

A tag has been placed on Frenzyland, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Daveosaurus (talk) 06:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of How volcanoes are good for us[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as How volcanoes are good for us, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cntras (talk) 01:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will be more responsible next time.

Wikiecam (talk) 03:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

January 2013[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hydrogen. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. StringTheory11 (t • c) 03:09, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]