User talk:Vertium/Archives/2017 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Biography feedback requested

Your input is requested about an RFC regarding Donald Trump. Here is a link directly to that RFC. The lead of that biography currently says, "Many of his statements in interviews, on Twitter, and at campaign rallies have been controversial." The RFC proposes to insert the words "or false" at the end of that sentence. Thank you in advance for participating. If you have the time, there is a second RFC at that talk page which proposes to instead add the words "or hyperbolic".Anythingyouwant (talk) 00:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:45, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

New newsletter for Notifications

Hello

You are subscribing to the Notifications newsletter on English Wikipedia.

That newsletter is now replaced by the monthly and multilingual Collaboration team newsletter, which will include information and updates concerning Notifications but also concerning Flow and Edit Review Improvements.

Please subscribe!

All the best, Trizek (WMF) (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vertium. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:04, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:38, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:06, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on File talk:Einstein and Locker-Lampson.jpeg. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Laura Prepon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Laura Prepon. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of pharmacies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of pharmacies. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Blockbuster LLC

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Blockbuster LLC. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Ethereum

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Ethereum. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of secret police organizations

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of secret police organizations. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Locomotives and rolling stock of the Victorian Railways, predecessors and successors

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Locomotives and rolling stock of the Victorian Railways, predecessors and successors. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017 Portland train attack

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Portland train attack. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:31, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Qaboos bin Said al Said

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Qaboos bin Said al Said. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bob Stoops

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bob Stoops. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 July 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

Administrators

Hello Vertium,

I hope that we can have a conversation about what you describe as authoritarian administrators on your user page. I would be very pleased if you would consider returning to editing more frequently. That is, of course, your decision entirely. Cullen328 Let's discuss it`

Hi Jim, (I'm Steve). I very much appreciate the offer of a conversation regarding observations of Administrative behavior by the very few that have made me back away from the project. Trust me, I fully understand that in a somewhat free-for-all environment of a wiki, there's an absolute requirement for people to wield the mop (and sometimes a stick) when things get messy. But in general, I've learned in my many years of doing this and in corporate leadership as well, that more is accomplished with civility and respect than with simple authority. Everyone knows an administrator has power, but no one likes hearing them brag about it, or having them use it rudely. When an administrator takes an action that dissuades a contributor from continuing, or in essence says, "thanks for your suggestion, but we'll do it my way", they seem more on a path of self-aggrandizement than project administration. At the risk of sounding trite, it only takes a few of those episodes to sour the desire to continue.
I don't for a moment believe that my contributions are or have been in any way more significant or important than anyone else's. Most of my editing has been in fighting vandalism, AfD and the former CVUA, to train those eager to fight vandalism to do it properly and educate those wanting to contribute to become more active in the project. I even developed a rubric for the education of vandalism-fighter academy, but one specific administrator announced he was in charge of that. He took elements of it, rolled it out as his own and excluded me from further participation. I found that unreasonable. Lastly, I've discontinued my monetary contributions to the project as well, though I will consider changing that stance if the recent changes to the Foundation leadership prove to be effective in making this a better environment for those of us who don't want to be admins, but want to contribute and feel as though their fellow volunteers at least appreciate it. I maintain great respect for those who work on this project because they believe in it. I have little respect for those who undertake adminship simply for more authority and power.
Again, I really appreciate you reaching out and inviting the dialogue. I'd be happy to hear your thoughts on this. All the best... Vertium When all is said and done 20:32, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Hello Steve. I did not choose to be an administrator for authority or power. That being said, I am truly honored by the support I received. I was asked many times to step forward and declined many times, but due to some positive developments with a disabled son, now seemed the right time. I take a very narrow view of administrator power. We delete and undelete articles, protect and unprotect articles, block clearly disruptive editors and unblock them when disruption has stopped, and so on. As I see it, administrators have no special powers regarding content or projects like an "academy", except in the sense that we are by definition pretty experienced editors. I am kind of a "strange beast" right now. I am a brand new administrator who hasn't yet used the toolkit. I spent the past few days thanking people and am now in the midst of an intense period of off-Wikipedia work that will dominate my attention for six days.
I do not donate money to the WMF since I donate so much time. They have plenty of money and need better communication and liason with editors more so than money. Perhaps that can be part of my role. I live near San Francisco and frequently attend WMF events there. Though I do not know the latest Executive Director well, I have met her (Katherine Maher) a few times and like her very much. I know many current and former WMF staffers and morale has definitely improved since Katherine took over.
I have never had a truly bad experience with an administrator but I have heard enough negative stories to be sure that it sometimes happens. The frequency must be hard to quantify since most editors do not spend time documenting their good interactions with administrators. As I transition to my new role, I am going to try to be one of the good guys and hope that I do not become jaded by interaction with trolls and vandals. If you ever see me being rude or abrupt, please let me know. I am alert to your concerns. Thank you. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 05:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
I suspected, after reading all the support !votes on your RfA, that you were not likely to be a negative admin. And my vote of neutrality on your RfA was admittedly more of an expression of my overall frustration with the adminship process and the relationship between experienced editors who want to help and the few bad apples amongst the admins. I am always open to dialogue, and even correction if I make an error. And while I concur with your statement that admins should have no special power over projects like the academy, they do in practical terms. And it's easier to back away than argue. My pledge to you, primarily because you took the extra effort to reach out, is to give serious consideration to more active editing. As I said earlier, I do believe in the project, and considering a return is the least I can do to support your new adminship. Thanks and best wishes for your off-WP work efforts! Vertium When all is said and done 20:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Harry Lauder

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Harry Lauder. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Randy Quaid

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Randy Quaid. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Yusof Ishak

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Yusof Ishak. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 5 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Cuneiform Records

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Cuneiform Records. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Donald Trump series

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Donald Trump series. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vertium/Archives/2017_1&oldid=820394979"