User talk:Unnamelessness/Archive 2
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Consesus
Can you show me where you see that consesus? If there is any, I'm fine with it? JamesAndersoon (talk) 12:10, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- JamesAndersoon, please see the discussion at WP:TENNIS, in which I have pinged you days before. Ignoring the discussion is likely to apply WP:SILENCE. If you want to revert these edits, please discuss first, especially given the WP:CONSENSUS has already turned around, rather than depending on WP:ILIKEIT. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- I saw that discusion, where literally only one user responded. On Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis there is not example for this type of table. Plus, you can't just say that is should be write in some way just because it's done like this on Roger Federer career statistics page. It is obvious that there must be consesus for all players, right? Right now almost all female tennis players have pages like ex. DNP instead of Did not play! It stayed like this for months, and nobody said a thing! Then there must be consesus for ALL STUFFS on career statistics pages, and literally no one cares. What about that? I mean, go ahead, but this is ridicilous. JamesAndersoon (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- JamesAndersoon, just because nobody opposed it does not equal to it has no problems. Sure, all pages should be consistent, which is why I already planned to update on this. Also, the WP:CONSENSUS depends regardless of the number of the editors who join the debate. And this not ridiculous at all. To justify if something is right, it should be based on POLICIES and discussion, instead of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST. Why The Big Four was moved to The Big Three months before? By your logic, just because The Big Four works fine for years, so it should not move? Totally incorrect. WP:CONSENSUS CHANGES. You just cannot do a thing for the sake of it. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Unnamelessness Agree with you, but whole point was that for me is pointless to just focus on one section of the career statistics pages while others still needed fixes. Question is when it's gonna be fixed ...? Hope so you understand my point of view. Cheers! JamesAndersoon (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- JamesAndersoon, I am already worked on it based on Category:Tennis career statistics. Will take a day or two to complete. Unnamelessness (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- Unnamelessness Agree with you, but whole point was that for me is pointless to just focus on one section of the career statistics pages while others still needed fixes. Question is when it's gonna be fixed ...? Hope so you understand my point of view. Cheers! JamesAndersoon (talk) 14:36, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- JamesAndersoon, just because nobody opposed it does not equal to it has no problems. Sure, all pages should be consistent, which is why I already planned to update on this. Also, the WP:CONSENSUS depends regardless of the number of the editors who join the debate. And this not ridiculous at all. To justify if something is right, it should be based on POLICIES and discussion, instead of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS or WP:OTHERSTUFFDOESNTEXIST. Why The Big Four was moved to The Big Three months before? By your logic, just because The Big Four works fine for years, so it should not move? Totally incorrect. WP:CONSENSUS CHANGES. You just cannot do a thing for the sake of it. Unnamelessness (talk) 12:38, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- I saw that discusion, where literally only one user responded. On Wikipedia:WikiProject Tennis there is not example for this type of table. Plus, you can't just say that is should be write in some way just because it's done like this on Roger Federer career statistics page. It is obvious that there must be consesus for all players, right? Right now almost all female tennis players have pages like ex. DNP instead of Did not play! It stayed like this for months, and nobody said a thing! Then there must be consesus for ALL STUFFS on career statistics pages, and literally no one cares. What about that? I mean, go ahead, but this is ridicilous. JamesAndersoon (talk) 12:26, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
Performance timelines
I saw that you added Iga Swiatek two wins from Billie Jean King Cup to performance timeline, but you didn't emphasize that table is now current after that tournament. I also added these two wins to the table and luckily someone saw my mistake and correct it. Please, in the future make a full update, otherwise there can be mistakes in counting. Cheers! JamesAndersoon (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GWF header.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:GWF header.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
red links on templates
Hi are you planning to create 2023 WRC article? Per Wikipedia:Red link Editors who add red links to navboxes are expected to actively work on building those articles, or the links may be removed from the template. Pelmeen10 (talk) 16:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, I am. Actually I have already started the 2023 draft article. Unnamelessness (talk) 16:34, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Rally Car
What was wrong with removing my own redundant chatter on the talk page of Rally Car? It has zero value, zero context and can always be found in the revision history.
Not sure why you added a redirect to any project page too but not querying that. Rally Wonk (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Only WP:TALKOFFTOPIC entries may be removed. In fact, they are usually collapsed as examples shown in WP:ITN. Unnamelessness (talk) 09:38, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2022 World Rally Championship
On 4 October 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 World Rally Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 11:37, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Mauro Forghieri
On 3 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mauro Forghieri, which you nominated and updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 11:03, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
ITN recognition for 2022 MotoGP World Championship
On 7 November 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2022 MotoGP World Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
Sorry.
I apologize for the edits I did for the wrc 2023 season wiki page. Didn't mean to cause harm. Sorry if it did. Yuiv22 (talk) 01:32, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
- No matter. WP:GOODFAITH. Unnamelessness (talk) 02:13, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kalle Rovanperä
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kalle Rovanperä you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 11:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
ITN recognition for Ken Block
On 5 January 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Ken Block, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. —Bagumba (talk) 10:50, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kalle Rovanperä
The article Kalle Rovanperä you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kalle Rovanperä and Talk:Kalle Rovanperä/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 07:41, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Kalle Rovanperä
The article Kalle Rovanperä you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Kalle Rovanperä for comments about the article, and Talk:Kalle Rovanperä/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kosack -- Kosack (talk) 10:42, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
DYK for Kalle Rovanperä
On 12 February 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kalle Rovanperä, which you recently nominated. The fact was ... that Kalle Rovanperä became the youngest podium finisher in 2020, the youngest event winner in 2021 and the youngest world champion in 2022 at the World Rally Championship? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kalle Rovanperä. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kalle Rovanperä), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 World Rally Championship
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2022 World Rally Championship you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 11:23, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry this is taking so long. I was looking to do it in a fortnight - but life got in the way. SSSB (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 World Rally Championship
The article 2022 World Rally Championship you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2022 World Rally Championship and Talk:2022 World Rally Championship/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 20:05, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of 2022 World Rally Championship
The article 2022 World Rally Championship you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2022 World Rally Championship for comments about the article, and Talk:2022 World Rally Championship/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 15:41, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Central Europe Rally
Template:Central Europe Rally has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
| Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |  |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
| |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. | |
ITN recognition for 2023 World Rally Championship
On 29 October 2023, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2023 World Rally Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:26, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)