User talk:Thomascampbell123

Welcome!

Hi Thomascampbell123! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 01:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm Ainlina. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Matt Shea seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Sourced and relevant negative content about politicians should stay, I think WP:NPOV does not preclude that being included. Thanks, Ainlina(box)? 21:32, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SounderBruce. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks from Willis Tucker. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! SounderBruce 22:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:49, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Larry Crouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Orr. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 2016 Gambian presidential election into 2021 Gambian presidential election. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 13:51, 28 December 2020 (UTC)

List of countries and dependencies by population

Dear Thomas, I noticed that you reverted my edit on List of countries and dependencies by population. Your edit summary gives me the impression that you did not read the discussion on that matter on the talk page of that article, where we evaluated in detail what the Template:UN Population does, what source lies at its base, and why it uses the range of numbers that it does. I will try to give you a short summary why I believe this source is superior to the one that you reverted to. The old source is from 2014, by the Ethiopian Statistics Agency, making a number of projections for a large range of future years, and the number picked was the projection for 2020. In itself that is a good source, and I would accept it as long as no more recent or more accurate source is available. But the above template provides just that. The source is from 2019, therefore 5 years newer than the CSA source, and it also provides a range of figures, going back to old historic numbers, and going through each of the last 20 years, and making projections up to 2020 (btw, the 2020 projection of the UN for Ethiopia is about 114 million, according to the UN source). Now, the makers of the template have decided to not use the 2020 projection, but the figure of 2018, because this is not a future projection, but an estimate of the known situation in the past. As such, I believe that figure has a higher weight as a source than a 2014 crystal ball of what the future 5 years from then might bring - and indeed it appears as if that old CSA number fell quite short from how the situation evolved in reality. I therefore kindly ask you to re-evaluate your revert, and if you cannot do so, I would like to hear your reasons why, best by participating in that discussion on the talk page of the list. Landroving Linguist (talk) 12:05, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Succeeded by

FYI, "succeeded by" doesn't mean who is currently in session. Every article would have to be updated on a regular basis if that was the case. What it means is, which person replaced him in the next relevant election. Think about it like this... which album followed Metallica's Black album from 1991? The correct answer is Load from 1996 - it will always be Load from 1996. Yes there are other albums that were later released, but they didn't follow the eponymous black album; Load did. Load succeeds the black album. No other album can make that claim. Leitmotiv (talk) 19:59, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

So Matt Shea is out of office and is succeeded by Rob Chase. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:04, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Edit Summaries

Hello again! It appears you've made a habit out of not including a summary to your edits. Remember, per H:FIES, it is Wikipedia's policy to "always provide an edit summary". As it states in the first paragraph, this will help people understand your edits and they will be less likely to revert you. This means less edit warring in general and less time wasted. Like your edit on Matt Shea, you replaced his successor without a summary. Because there already was a successor in place prior to your edit, it appeared as if you were editing wantonly. Thanks for understanding. I look forward to seeing you become great asset to Wikipedia! Leitmotiv (talk) 00:27, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Draft:2021 Laotian parliamentary election

I see you've got a draft for this that hasn't been touched in a while; I was going to write the article and nominate it for DYK. Political hooks can't run if it's less than 30 days before an election, so if you don't say anything, I'm gonna write it myself in the next couple of days. But since you already made a draft, I wanted to give you a chance to move it into mainspace before scooping you.... best, jp×g 15:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! ― Tartan357 ^Talk 22:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Alright, I will provide edit summaries. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 03:02, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

"As of" and CURRENTYEAR macro

Please *STOP* making edits like this one [1] to political pages. That is, do not use {{CURRENTYEAR}} macros in "as of" statements. You are adding statements that will become incorrect as they age, which is a violation of Wikipedia's accuracy guidelines and manual of style. See the following: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Relative_time_references and Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style#Current

And from the "as of" template, Template:As_of#Usage_guidelines: "Using ... variables such as {{As of|{{CURRENTYEAR}}}} is a relative time reference and the equivalent to using "currently", which is generally against the precise language guideline."

Also, I've noted all of these edits you're doing of this type (and you seem to be the only editor doing them) are missing edit summaries. 71.62.227.79 (talk) 08:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

OK, I'll stop. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 10:06, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

If you're going to replace "collapse top", make sure you also replace "collapse bottom"

At 2020 United States House of Representatives elections in Texas and a handful of similar articles, you replaced {{collapse top}} with table markup but left {{collapse bottom}} in place. Please revisit those articles and use table closing markup to finish your work. I did the Texas article for you. It looks like all of the articles in which you "hid hypothetical polling" in this list of contributions need the same fix. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:39, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

You are also removing <noinclude>...</noinclude> tags, which causes the hypothetical polling, along with the errors that you are introducing, to appear at Statewide opinion polling for the 2020 United States presidential election. Please stop removing those noinclude tags. This is becoming disruptive. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:51, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

OK Thomascampbell123 (talk) 16:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Maps

How do you create an election results county map? Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:25, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Please fix or revert the edits referred to above before moving on to other endeavors. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:46, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Results updates

Please be more careful when updating results. When you made this update, you put the wrong vote totals against numerous parties.

Also, I am not sure why you removed 'against all'. It is a valid option in Bulgarian elections. Cheers, Number 57 00:05, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

On the website, 'against all' is not included in the total amount of votes. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 00:09, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

April 2021

Hello, I'm Schazjmd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Reagan Dunn, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 22:17, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Reagan Dunn, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Why exactly is our campaigns not a reliable source? Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:23, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

See the entry for ourcampaigns.com at WP:RSPS. Also read the date of birth policy. Schazjmd (talk) 19:34, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

It says that our campaigns is "generally unreliable due to having self published content." In which instances would this source be reliable? Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

See the RfC discussion and a follow-up discussion. Also see user-generated content and WP:ABOUTSELF. Schazjmd (talk) 19:43, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

You don't seem to be aware of what is considered a reliable source for biographies on Wikipedia. Please learn. You can start at WP:RS and WP:RSP. You have been advised of the discretionary sanctions for BLPs below. Do not continue to add unsourced/poorly sourced date of birth to Reagan Dunn or any other biography. It doesn't matter whether that's his date of birth, if it cannot be verified in reliable sources, per WP:DOB. Schazjmd (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Bill de Blasio

I don't understand this edit. De Blasio is not a lawyer. He never went to law school and nothing in his article indicates that he's a lawyer. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

I read that he was one on a google search.Here Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability. If you are going to add a new claim to an article, accompany it with a citation to a reliable source. That is a basic Wikipedia policy. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:56, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Ok, thanks Thomascampbell123 (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Schazjmd (talk) 19:22, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drew Stokesbary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BS.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2022 United States House of Representatives election in Wyoming

added a link pointing to The Hill

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2021 Laotian parliamentary election

Hello, Thomascampbell123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021 Laotian parliamentary election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 15 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Hello, I'm Tartan357. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 2021 United States state legislative elections, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Tartan357 ^Talk 04:55, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2021 Laotian parliamentary election

Hello, Thomascampbell123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2021 Laotian parliamentary election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:13, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Polling

Hey, as a person who's obsessed with data, records, and statistics, I wanted to personally thank you for all your polling edits you've made in Wikipedia and I appreciate you very much. You can delete this after you read it. Lostfan333 (talk) 03:05, 29 June 2021 (UTC) -- Hi ThomasCampbell123. I noticed that you deleted a mayoral candidate from the 2021 Seattle mayoral primary election (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Seattle_mayoral_election) stating that the candidate has less than 5% in polls. I do not thing there are any rules in wikipedia that says that candidate without a certain approval or polling must not be included in a wikipedia page. In fact, this seems like voter suppression. Thank you ----LauraMusikanski

August 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lorena González (Seattle politician), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SounderBruce 23:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SounderBruce. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! SounderBruce 20:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

The redlinks that I unlinked were likely not notable enough for articles. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:13, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 20

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Sam Nichols

added a link pointing to Henry McBride

Wickliffe Stratton

added a link pointing to Henry McBride

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

2010 United States Senate special election in Delaware

Hi there! I saw you recently removed a reference from the infobox at 2010 United States Senate special election in Delaware. This was a named reference that was also used later in the article, so removing it broke reference 54 - see your edit. I fixed the error by adding the reference in this edit. Happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 04:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 California gubernatorial election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kevin Kiley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Oregon's 6th congressional district

Hi Thomascampbell123, I noticed that you recently edited the PVI rating of the 6th to exclude the fact that the PVI shown is applicable 2023 onwards, as currently the district is non-existent. I think it would be good if we can include the pre-redistricting & post-redistricting PVIs to all districts, by adding (until 2023) & (from 2023) respectively. What are your thoughts? Thanks! ---CX Zoom(^he/_him) (^{let's talk}|_contribs) 08:08, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

The PVI is from a combination of the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections. Although the district will not exist until January 2023, the PVI is still from 2020. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 15:25, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Cut and paste moves

Hey, I appreciate you trying to standardize article names for elections - but in situations like 2012 Washington state elections, can I please ask that you go to WP:RM/TR and make a request there instead of copying the contents from one page to another? This creates a mess with the page history. Thanks! Elli (talk | contribs) 18:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I will do this next time Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:22, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Bob Dunn (Washington politician) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Dunn (Washington politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Dunn (Washington politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ymblanter (talk) 07:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

2024 Washington Secretary of State election moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2024 Washington Secretary of State election, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SounderBruce 22:14, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:State secretary of state elections in the United States in 2024

A tag has been placed on Category:State secretary of state elections in the United States in 2024 indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 15:54, 4 October 2021 (UTC)

Andrew Cuomo

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Andrew Cuomo, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Travellers & Tinkers (talk) 18:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Okay, I'll use the sandbox in the future. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 19:17, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Whatcom County Council

Template:Whatcom County Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. SounderBruce 07:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 California elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 California elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:55, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Vermont elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Vermont elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:57, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Massachusetts elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Massachusetts elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Nebraska elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Nebraska elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Sarah Perry (politician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sarah Perry (politician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SounderBruce 04:05, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to King County Council, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Wait until election results are certified before adding results. Don't change the composition of the council until after the new members are sworn-in. SounderBruce 05:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I will add back my new map in January 2022. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 06:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edward Durr, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 07:25, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

2024 United States presidential election in Wisconsin

Hi @Thomascampbell123: I had to remove that again, sorry. Policy defines you can't put external links in an article, unless your they're in the External Links section, or bibliography, further reading, literature section. Please don't add it back in. scope_creep^Talk 16:15, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, I won't add it back. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 16:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tracy Owen for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tracy Owen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tracy Owen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Elli (talk | contribs) 21:56, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Nate Nehring moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nate Nehring, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. scope_creep^Talk 23:48, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2024 Georgia elections

A tag has been placed on Category:2024 Georgia elections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Sources used for Pierce County Executive

Can you confirm whether you have access to the newspaper articles used in your expansion of Pierce County Executive? I checked the Times archive for those dates and neither article exists. SounderBruce 00:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

I haven't yet been able to find the archive; please can you find appropriate articles to cite for this article. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Then don't create fake sources. It's actively hurting the reliability of articles and is not appropriate behavior. SounderBruce 02:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Ok, sorry. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 02:02, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

Whatcom County Executive moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Whatcom County Executive, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. SounderBruce 02:41, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Reagan Dunn, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You were informed in April, 2021, that ourcampaigns is not an acceptable source (see its entry at WP:RSPS). Do not use that website as a source for information in Wikipedia articles. Please study WP:DOB. Schazjmd (talk) 16:01, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

I see so many articles that have our campaigns as a source from a while ago and no one has anything against them. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Feel free to remove it where you find it, and either tag the information that it sourced as needing a citation or remove the improperly sourced information. Schazjmd (talk) 17:00, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 20:13, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2021 Gambian presidential election

On 8 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2021 Gambian presidential election, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 01:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Election County Maps

I was wondering how to create county election maps. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:15, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birthday Party.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Snohomish County Council

Template:Snohomish County Council has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 10:23, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Roland H. Hartley

Hey, I noticed you added back in the sentence in the intro of Roland H. Hartley about his being the last socially conservative Republican governor of Washington. I haven't seen this kind of assessment on other politicians' pages since it seems hard to get right (for example, who would be "the last socially conservative Republican senator from Maine"?), and IMO it's hard to apply terms like "social conservative" and "social liberal" to pre-New Deal-era politicians. Abortion and affirmative action were not even conceived as political issues at the time Hartley was in government, and it's also not clear that Hartley's environmental stance was any different from that of other politicians in the West. I think just describing Hartley as "conservative" and leaving out trying to compare him to subsequent governors would make more sense. There are also a lot of pages that justify that label, e.g. [2] and [3]. What do you think? GlobeGores (talk page | user page) 01:48, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

I think that the only three Republican governors of Washington since Hartley were socially liberal based on many actions they did, such as affirmative action programs and abortion legalization. However, I agree with you that the American political parties were not as divided based on conservatism and liberalism prior to the Great Depression. Therefore, labeling Hartley as the last socially conservative Republican governor of Washington can be somewhat contradictory and false. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 01:54, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Does that mean you agree with deletion of that sentence? W.stanovsky (talk) 08:27, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes, I agree with deleting the sentence. Politics always change and one could make the argument that many of the social issues of today were not relevant when Hartley was governor. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 15:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

2026 United States elections moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2026 United States elections, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll wait until after the 2022 midterms to recreate it. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 23:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2024 Washington Secretary of State election

Hello, Thomascampbell123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Washington Secretary of State election, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:2024 Washington Secretary of State election

Hello, Thomascampbell123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2024 Washington Secretary of State election".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Washington politicians' biographical info

Hi, User:Thomascampbell123. I notice that you've added a number of biographical details that I couldn't find on a couple of my recent new articles about Washington politicians. I'm curious where you're finding this information; I can try and look it up myself. Also, in a perfect world these things would be cited, and none of the references I've included in the articles support the details you've added. (I don't think.) Anyway, thanks for the help! W.stanovsky (talk) 03:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

I've found these details on https://leg.wa.gov/History/Legislative/Documents/MembersOfLeg2019.pdf. It includes all legislators and session dates. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 03:59, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Fantastic! I’m thrilled to know about that resource. It answers some other questions I’ve had too, like about Belle Reeves’s representation of a 56th district that no longer exists (and has no presence on Wikipedia). Thanks for the link! W.stanovsky (talk) 19:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC) W.stanovsky (talk) 19:49, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States House of Representatives elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antonio Delgado.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch § RfC: Relative time references - 'today' or not 'today'?

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Words to watch § RfC: Relative time references - 'today' or not 'today'?. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

DeSantis defeats Trump

Can you add the New Hampshire Republican Primary poll that has DeSantis defeating Trump for President?? Lostfan333 (talk) 01:07, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Someone else already added it. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 03:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh, my bad. Thanks for replying. Lostfan333 (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States presidential election in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 United States Senate election in New York, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brandon Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Kentucky's 1st congressional district

added a link pointing to Daniel Cameron

Kentucky's 2nd congressional district

added a link pointing to Daniel Cameron

Kentucky's 4th congressional district

added a link pointing to Daniel Cameron

Kentucky's 5th congressional district

added a link pointing to Daniel Cameron

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)