User talk:TheresNoTime/old/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk page stalkers - any of you use PGP?

A question -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:26, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

Well, yes, I use GNU Privacy Guard for signing email and encrypting backup data stored in the cloud. I use Hushmail for much of my email messaging, as it uses OpenPGP for encryption/decryption. I have a GnuPG add-on for my local email system, Thunderbird. There are few PGP users generally, so I find I can't use PGP much for general emails. I tend to use the Signal messaging app more often for secure communications, both text and voice. Geoff | Who, me? 22:00, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
@Glane23: Interesting.. I used to use it heavily but ended up losing keys and the such. I recently created a new key (0xB66DB2C1) solely for this account, am I correct in thinking this would be a good way for proving ownership of the account should I get compromised (encrypting a message with the private key)? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Category:Wikipedians who use PGP. — xaosflux Talk 01:27, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
@Xaosflux: I should have guessed... you got me there -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:54, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
PGP? No, I use the Central Line. But thanks for asking :p — fortunavelut luna 14:00, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Mind your fingers, mind your toes, watch the doors, they're gonna close. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

I believe I use PGP but to be completely honest I'm not sure. It has me baffled that I don't know. Dinah In Wonderland 14:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Regarding "proving ownership" with PGP. Here is what you can do:

  1. Post your PUBLIC KEY (not just the index/hash value of it)
  2. Make a posting that is SIGNED by your PUBLIC KEY
That will show that you are in control of the PRIVATE key and can be verified by anyone. In the future, you can prove that you have access to the same private key that you have access to now (that presumably you have kept secure) by creating a new message and signing it again. That new message will be able to be verified again by anyone with the ORIGINAL public key you posted. — xaosflux Talk 14:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
ENCRYPTING a message is not the way to do this - the SIGNING is how you do it. For example, look at the "ownership" statement on User:Fluxbot. — xaosflux Talk 14:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Ahhh, thank you Xaos - I'll do that :) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:23, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 August 2017

This Month in GLAM: July 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #272

21:45, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Request of removal of permission to use Twinkle for Adamgerber80

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions#Removal of permissions leads me to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, which I have no access to. Could you please post the following notice on behalf of me (as Adamgerber80's rollback right was approved by you)? Thank you! --146.96.252.3 (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)


Recently I added some material, well sourced (except a mistake: I mismemorized the year 1973 as 1968), to Kingdom of Sikkim, which was subsequently reverted by Adamgerber80 with a threat to block me. His edit and threat were subsequently reverted by another user (which was to my surprise, years ago it would just leave there).

It would be a happy ending but later I realized Adamgerber80 do not at all think he has done anything wrong and questioned Kautilya3's right to "undo issued warnings". He attributed the issue to "ones which have a history of pushing their agenda", which he later clarified that it has nothing to do with "this particular case":

As he insinuated my behaviour were the reason of the conflict while I have never added anything unsourced or done any vandalism in WIkipedia, I intervened into and told him even if he believes that a small part of my edit withour source, he could just undo the small part and ask for a reference about it, instead of undo all valid edits and issue a threat. Unfortunately, he didn't agree to change his "approach", using his word.

I believe, if more than 1~2 percent of rollback from a user are false positive with false warning, granting him rollback right would do more harm than good, as Twinkle rollbacks and warnings give inexperienced users a facade that his edit might be reverted by an admin and he might be warned by an admin (thus more people would refrain from editing Wikipedia). Plus, without Twinkle, one can still undo edits, leave messages, etc. Also, I have noticed that this is not the first time Adamgerber80 has done a disputed rollback within the eight months he has rollback rights (see his talk page). For all of those reason above, I request a removal of Adamgerber80's Twinkle permission. --146.96.252.3 (talk) 05:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi There'sNoTime, Please have a look at User_talk:Adamgerber80#Don.27t_bite_newbies and the edits in question. I believe the editor above is misrepresenting facts to suit his/her narrative. I would be more than happy to clarify any of the rationale behind above mentioned edits or any other edits by me in the past (That is if you feel one is required). Thanks and sorry for bothering you. Adamgerber80 (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2017 (UTC)
He will not be responsible to cancel any permissions from you. Instead, he will transfer this problem to the incident notice board and you will receive a notice then. There, everyone will look into the case and I believe they'll not just listen to one user and judge your behaviour. People will look into everything, include your ur entire user talk page (not just that section), my user history and yours. So relax. --146.96.252.3 (talk) 19:09, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Only if you have free time...

Hello There'sNoTime. Hope all is well. If you could undelete Clark Stacey, I'll try and add a paragraph or two (but really, only if you have free time; I actually don't mind either way). See you around. Lourdes 14:18, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Lourdes: All restored best of luck! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:20, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Thanks and cheers :) Lourdes 14:22, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

OS

This edit related a user with their own IP. --Kostas20142 (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

@Kostas20142: That they did, and WP:OS does state that it can be used to hide the IP data of editors who accidentally logged out, but given you reverted the edit and didn't attempt to follow up with the IP (asking if they meant to edit logged out) I can't imagine you've contacted OS.. Perhaps you should contact the IP first -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
It was the first ever edit from this IP (and the only one), and all this just looked accidental to me. And due to the request, A real name was also related with this very address (which is nonpublic information). Anyways maybe you are right.--Kostas20142 (talk) 18:07, 11 August 2017 (UTC)

How to get KRYGA Music wiki page retrieved?

Hello,

I created KRYGA Music page, and it got deleted. Can you give me some advice on how to edit it and make the page approved and public? Thank you so much! EmergencyRoomAgency (talk) 15:15, 13 August 2017 (UTC)Emergency Room Agency 8/13/2017

Please read the notability requirements. If you have any questions about how Wikipedia works, the place to ask is at the Tea House. -- Alexf(talk) 15:50, 13 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #273

I already put the source in my description. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 09:15, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@TheNewSMG: Well unfortunately that link doesn't work for me, and it can't be considered a reliable source - do you think you could find a mention of it in news outlet? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:18, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, on to it. TheNewSMG (talk) 09:19, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Here: http://www.india.com/showbiz/star-parivaar-awards-2017-winners-list-karan-patel-divyanka-tripathi-dahiya-nakuul-mehta-wins-the-most-prestigious-award-2178739/ TheNewSMG (talk) 09:20, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Without delving upon whether the information is sourced; the problem is the non-independency of the awards as I already wrote in the article talk page..Winged Blades Godric 09:25, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict)--Also as aptly mentioned at Star Parivaar Awards--it is an accolade by Star Plus to promote own programmes and characters.Winged Blades Godric 09:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

The awards are notable to the show because it revolves around the 2 main characters. TheNewSMG (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

If you are doing this just because you do not like the show then please stop. TheNewSMG (talk) 09:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

All popular Hindi TV shows on Wikipedia have the awards mentioned in the article. For example, Jodha Akbar, Siya Ke Ram, and Chakravartin Ashoka Samrat all have the respective awards mentioned so why not mention Chandra Nandini awards?? Thank you. TheNewSMG (talk) 09:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@TheNewSMG and Winged Blades of Godric: That's a good source to start with TheNewSMG I think this conversation would be better had at Talk:Chandra_Nandini#Awards -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

23:29, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Active admin needed

Would you mind taking care of the IP on my talk page? I see you are active in the Recent Changes log. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:46, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! Greatly appreciated. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
@EvergreenFir: No worries - just nuking your talk page history, and I've popped two days of semi-protection on it to bore them. Anything else I can do to help? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 06:51, 15 August 2017 (UTC)
That's plenty, thank you! As amusing as the affirmations are, the semi protection is appreciated. Sometimes so much validation is a bit tiring. Thank you for the quick block. I do appreciate it! :) EvergreenFir (talk) 06:56, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

The Rambling Man

Didn't you tell me on my talk page a few days ago that his removal of 3rd-party comments was inappropriate? If he's going to follow me around undoing things I do, maybe I should look in to an IBAN. And I know I shouldn't assume malicious intent, but it does seem queer those things he's done, especially since whenever I ask him to stop doing them, his answer is, "Shut up! You're going to get banned very soon!". BTW, I am here because TRM apparently doesn't want me talking about him and/or to you on his own page. pbp 20:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

In answer to what you said on TRM's page while I was here, the answer to, "Do I really think that?" is "Yes". pbp 20:33, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
And what is it with his 'tude? His airs suggest that I'm somebody horrendously beneath him. I'm hardly the first to be rubbed the wrong way on that one. pbp 20:36, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
(edit conflict) It was inappropriate, but then again it's in that same grey area where people believe it's inappropriate to template a regular - regardless of TRM's, yours or my own opinion on DTTR, I think the best thing anyone can do on Wikipedia in these sorts of situations is step well away from the editor, and get stuck into something else. You're welcome to pursue a formal IBAN, but it's just more drama than this website is worth imho.. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
I know Wikipedia's a big place, but that dude has his fingers in a lot of pots. Especially some of the very important ones. I feel like he's betting on me starting some discussion where he can counter with his "Ban PBP" BS, so I'm going to hold off on the IBAN proposal until he does something else egregious. pbp 20:42, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
By all means don't hold off. I will fully support an IBAN. Let me know when you request it and I'll pop by to add my unwavering and indefinite support. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Let me ask this: I am still interested in participating in ITNC from time to time. I may be again interested in participating in 2017 or other RYs when something important comes up. (These interests are not TRM-related and ebb and flow with what's happening in the world). An IBAN doesn't forbid me from completely desisting from those places, does it? pbp 20:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
  • Here's what I'd like in an IBAN:
  1. TRM and I can't undo each other in any space.
  2. TRM and I can't post on each other's talk pages.
  3. TRM and I can't start discussions on the other's conduct
Am I missing anything? pbp 20:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Traditional IBAN covers all that, and you can't pick-and-choose. I'm happy to do that, whoever gets to a thread first can comment, otherwise it's blockville, as I discovered earlier this year. You won't be banned from participating, but you will be banned from commenting on any thread I start or any comment I make on any other thread. Ditto me to you. I'm extremely happy with that. After you. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
^ What TRM said, though formally requesting it is just taking Wikipedia a little too seriously eh? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Re: What are you doing?

Just block me again now, I don't have time fixing the portal. I think South Park is higher then Family Guy based on the pageviews report. My edits were autistic when I got blocked for excessive uploads, mainly my edits to Courage the Cowardly Dog was a huge mistake. JJ98 (Talk) 20:39, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

@Jj98: Are you alright? I'd recommend taking a bit of a break from Wikipedia if it's stressing you out! Would you like to be blocked to enforce a break? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:46, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

I need an admin

There'sNoTime, since there is no active admin checking my case I want you to take a look at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Snowsleeping and determine the case whether the 2 accounts that I suspected are sockpuppets of Snowsleeping. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 11:11, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@TheNewSMG: Hmm, I can see some overlap, but I think it's not enough to duck block them. I'd recommend waiting for a clerk to endorse a checkuser -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 11:26, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Ok, thank you very much! I believe though that this case needs a checkuser. TheNewSMG (talk) 11:33, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Indiana Jones and the Wrong Version.png

Hi. I see that you have protected the userpage. However, it's the WP:WRONGVERSION. Please restore the version before the edit war began. Kingsindian   13:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

The Wrong Version is biased, nationalistic, libellous, inaccurate and a disgrace to Wikipedia in general. There are no reports of a sysop ever having protected the "right" version. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:00, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

The Devil's Advocate

I see you've full-protected TDA's user page - but it's now at the blanked version. Would you mind if I reverted it to how TDA left it? GoldenRing (talk) 13:54, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

@GoldenRing: Sure! I only protected it because the edit warring was getting a bit silly -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:01, 15 August 2017 (UTC)

Revert of autoedit

Note that anyone who has this script installed, will get 0 support from me on VPT. There is a big difference between "'does something" vs works correctly. This script has not been properly mainyained in 10 years (older than an iphone) and probably constitues a security problem for its users due its usage of eval. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 14:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi There'sNoTime, I am wanting to arrive at a consensus on this article. I have already put my claim at Talk:Battle of Haldighati on what I disagree with that is on the article. I want you to see if you agree with my claim. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 14:43, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Private edit filter

Is there any way for a lowly user like me to view the results of the edit filter you just created/modified, short of requesting to become an WP:EFM myself? I'm really interested in adding cases to the LTA. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:07, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

@Bri: I've emailed you relating to this message -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:06, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Update

Since you have protected the page Islamic terrorism in Europe (2014–present), could you please update the "List of attacks" section to show the recent attack on Barcelona. Thanks. Darius robin (talk) 11:56, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

@Darius robin: I've unprotected the page, seeing as that was primarily what the dispute was about - in my opinion, the admin who fully protects an article due to a content dispute should not make any changes relating to that dispute -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Re-pinged at Talk:Robert Hardy

Hello again. You are re-pinged at Talk:Robert Hardy. --George Ho (talk) 23:57, 18 August 2017 (UTC)

Responded, thank you -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

University of Phoenix

I have an issue with Nihlus Kryik's use of rollback. I deleted critism and lawsuit sections under the University of Phoenix, because we as editors seem to have a double standard. There are major universities that have far greater sins and crimes against them, but yet these sections do not exist and should and until these are added to other universities one should not be the "whipping boy" for editors.

This was clearly not vandalism and Nihlus Kryik extremely abused their roll back authority.Ballastrae (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

There is clearly nothing here about rapes investigations etc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baylor_University

nor anything about raping children and/or the lack of leadership here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_State_University

I can add site after site, but you get my pointBallastrae (talk) 13:13, 19 August 2017 (UTC) Ballastrae (talk) 13:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

(edit conflict) @Ballastrae: Edit warring and removing content for a stupid reason like not holding up the same standards for other universities (and putting shit like We can do this all day!!!!!!!!!!! in your edit summary) and then telling an admin is a really bad idea. Blocked for 31 hours. No abuse of rollback (though @Nihlus Kryik: in the future, please don't continually revert, and instead let an admin know so we can block them quicker) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:20, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Pennsylvania State University#Child sex abuse scandal. That? You can't just constantly remove something from an article because you don't like it or because WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST or don't exist. Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. The preferred course of action would be to add the information that is missing, not disrupting other articles to prove something. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 13:18, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
Will do. I've seen admins bite at the lack of four warnings before though on AIV. — nihlus kryik  (talk) 13:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
It happens, and you were working through the warnings very well - in this case I think you did fine sometimes however you may find that an editor hits 3RR before you work through all the warnings. In that case, a report to WP:ANEW or even just a message on an admin's talk will bring a quicker resolution to the disruption -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi There'sNoTime, would you please take care of this harassing editor? User:SahabAliwadia warned this IP on his/her talk page for making disruptive edits to Tomorrow's Pioneers and then this IP did the same thing by falsely accusing SahabAliwadia of disruptive edits on his talk page. SahabAliwadia and I both warned this IP for falsely accusing people of disruptive edits/harrassment on the IP's talk page. Once again he falsely accused both SahabAliwadia and me on our talk pages for harrasing/falsely accusing people of disruptive edits. I find it funny that after all of this the IP claims that him/her did not make the edits and the IP was being used by someone else AND he expects us to believe his crap. It is getting really annoying. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 02:34, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

You are right user. He warned me once again saying to tell him what he did wrong knowing what he did and, and, and when he was blocked for 3 months, he once again warned this user in his talk page saying that he will block him and he is happy for that. Please administrator, block him indefinitely and revoke his talk page access. SahabAliwadia 07:47, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
@SahabAliwadia: Hi, I see the IP has been blocked - we don't block IP addresses indefinitely as they are often shared between lots of people, and it could stop a good editor from being able to contribute. I will keep an eye on the IP for you -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: But he is also blocked in past (see this), but no improvement can be seen by me. SahabAliwadia 11:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

User:SahabAliwadia is correct this IP has been blocked several times before but no improvement. Right now this IP is editing my warning content and making it look like he is warning me. When I warned him that he will lose his talk page access he said the same thing back to me. So far, SahabAliwadia and I warned once again that if the IP continues his behavior he will lose access to edit his talk page. Please revoke talk page access and ban him indefinitely. Check User talk:72.198.49.108 (history too) for all information. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 11:48, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Just curious but did you block User:72.198.49.108 from editing their talk page because it has been 3 hours since he has not responded to my warning. Thanks. TheNewSMG (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #274

18:01, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.

Technology update:

  • Rentier has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.

General project update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
  • Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)

ANI thread for your radar

Since you're agreeing to mentor User:Mark0880, you should probably be aware of this thread he just opened at ANI. only (talk) 22:31, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Thanks guys. I shouldve sent this over, yes. Thank you only. Mark0880 (talk) 22:47, 23 August 2017 (UTC)Mark0880

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
I have always appreciated your patience... May I borrow some? ScrpIronIV 18:00, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
@ScrapIronIV: well thank you, I appreciate that is there anything I can help you with? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:49, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Not really - was dealing with an old troublemaker recently, one that you had also tried to help out with me a couple of years ago. Brought you to mind, so I thought I'd say hello. ScrpIronIV 12:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

IP 72.198.49.108 block evasion

It is clear that IP 72.198.49.108 is evading their block using the IP98.191.196.7.

One article, America at a Crossroads, is a clear indicator that IP72.198 = IP98.191

And there are more similar edits. Azadbeh, Racism in Saudi Arabia, Beliefs and ideology of Osama bin Laden, just to name a few articles I have found. Both IPs call editors that have reverted them, vandals, socks, etc. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #275

ACTRIAL

Hi. The trial goes live in only 5 days. I can't see a reply from you confirming that you would be able to make the interface changes. This is only a few minutes work, but we need to have an admin lined up to it. Could you please let us know. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 22:38, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2017).

Administrator changes

added NakonScott
removed SverdrupThespianElockidJames086FfirehorseCelestianpowerBoing! said Zebedee

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • You will now get a notification when someone tries to log in to your account and fails. If they try from a device that has logged into your account before, you will be notified after five failed attempts. You can also set in your preferences to get an email when someone logs in to your account from a new device or IP address, which may be encouraged for admins and accounts with sensitive permissions.
  • Syntax highlighting is now available as a beta feature (more info). This may assist administrators and template editors when dealing with intricate syntax of high-risk templates and system messages.
  • In your notification preferences, you can now block specific users from pinging you. This functionality will soon be available for Special:EmailUser as well.

Arbitration

  • Applications for CheckUser and Oversight are being accepted by the Arbitration Committee until September 12. Community discussion of the candidates will begin on September 18.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi

I kept trying to add a request for unprotection to the protection modification request page but for some reason I kept being disallowed by some edit filter nonsense? I don't know why, but I saw you are an admin, so I was wondering if you can help me. Here is what I was trying to post on the request page:

Grenada has been semiprotected for more than 4 years, for no good reason. There was not any unusual or egregious level of abuse back in 2013 when it was protected, and I don't see how an article like that would warrant indefinite protection. Can you please remove the protection, at least to see if there is a problem? 192.31.106.34 (talk) 13:16, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi IP, just dealing with something and then I will take a look at this for you. That, or a friendly talk page watcher will help you out -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) of no earthly use to either of you; but that does seem a rather excessive protection. Odd, to say the least. — fortunavelut luna 13:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
@Maxim: as the operative admin in... 2013 :D — fortunavelut luna 13:36, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Banned IP vandal is back

You just banned 220.122.179.191 and he is back with a new IP – 81.106.240.17. – Sabbatino (talk) 08:10, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Already blocked -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

22:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #276

22:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Request for ease in protection

Dear admin,

The Wiki page on "Bilal Akbar" relates to a serving General officer and present Chief of General Staff in the Pakistan Army.

I understand that the page was repeatedly vandalised and certain people went against community standards to misuse their authorities. There are certain entries or rather allegations of human rights violations attributed to the said General officer.

I request you to please allow me to remove the false allegations from the page or you may remove them. Allegations hurled against the officer, when cross-checked from their original sources, do not implicitly refer to him by name, nor do they provide incriminating evidence of his past record having engaged in such violent activities.

I will be grateful and obliged to your kind assistance.

With regards, Zedman — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zedmanpk (talkcontribs) 10:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

@Zedmanpk: I'm interested in how a brand new user's first edit is to request edits to an article they've never edited.. Which statements don't you agree with? Do you agree that the Human Rights Watch is a reliable source of information (namely, https://www.hrw.org/news/2016/05/06/pakistan-independently-investigate-aftab-ahmads-death)? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Response

Dear There'sNoTime,

My request may not carry weight, as such, since I am indeed a new user. Human Rights Watch (HRW) is certainly a credible forum but my point of contention is that the user "Rameezraja001" who inserted these details in the first place did so out of political motives and bias. I probed his editorial contributions and found that he has made entries in favour of Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM), a Karachi-based political party which has direct conflict of interests / issues with the Pakistan Army.

This is similar to someone from, say, the Democrat lobby making entries critical of Republican President Donald Trump. But beyond that, to give a separate heading under "Torture" beside the name of a serving General officer is objectionable. I represent the institution which he belongs to that is why I placed this polite request before you.

I would be very grateful if you oblige.

With kind regards, Zedmanpk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zedmanpk (talkcontribs) 05:02, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2017

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:41, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

@Cahk: Done, thanks :) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #277

"Regarding NSEL case"

I would like to bring your attention towards this page once again. Its content has been reversed a couple of times by Nimrodindia and CMshah in the past few days without adherence to the consensus building exercise. The reference links shared by the former user are as old as 2013 as stated by Michaeltibbs which have been modified as per the case’s progression under the judiciary. If I may say so, this is an example of blatant ignorance to Wikipedia’s norms. I request you to look into the matter and suggest a way forward so as to put an end to these edit wars and gain neutrality on the page. Thank you. Anrdshr (talk) 18:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

19:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: August 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Invitation to Admin confidence survey

Hello,

Beginning in September 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Anti-harassment tool team will be conducting a survey to gauge how well tools, training, and information exists to assist English Wikipedia administrators in recognizing and mitigating things like sockpuppetry, vandalism, and harassment.

The survey should only take 5 minutes, and your individual response will not be made public. This survey will be integral for our team to determine how to better support administrators.

To take the survey sign up here and we will send you a link to the form.

We really appreciate your input!

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

For the Anti-harassment tools team, SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 20:56, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

WL

Thought the WL notice was good, was there opposition? — xaosflux Talk 17:57, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Disregard, saw the complaint on the talk page. — xaosflux Talk 17:58, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

15:32, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #278

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!

Technology update:

  • The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: T175225

General project update:

  • On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
  • Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
I've been giving out a lot of these recently, but ACTRIAL really has been a team effort and your assistance with the technical aspects of it have been very helpful. Creating the checklist page helped organize our thoughts and make for an orderly launch. Thanks for all the work. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
@TonyBallioni: Thanks for this, and thank you for taking ACTRIAL under your wing. Here's hoping it makes for a successful experiment -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

69.118.237.203

Thank you for blocking this IP address. However, did you happen to notice the block log for this IP? It has had a very significant/long history of abusive edits, and I don't think a short block is gonna stop them for very long at all... Thanks. 2601:1C0:103:D067:D8D0:E389:CEE5:2C15 (talk) 07:15, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the shorter block, I just think that other admins would have done it differently. That's all. 2601:1C0:103:D7EB:D8D0:E389:CEE5:2C15 (talk) 07:47, 20 September 2017 (UTC)
Quite right, thanks for pointing it out! Sorry I've not corrected it sooner, these darn errors... -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:21, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Messi

He has made a further edit after your warning. Kind regards ChocolateRabbit 15:57, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2017

Thanks!

Hi There'sNoTime, thank you for your comments at my RfA. Your support is much appreciated! Cheers, ansh666 19:02, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

@Ansh666: Hey no worries, I don't even mind being called someone else Take it slow, be open to criticism and suggestions and don't burn yourself out -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:25, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

-

The Admin's Barnstar
For the very prompt and helpful way you dealt with a boring admin task. Α Guy into Books § (Message) -  14:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
@Aguyintobooks: Thank you it's not all glitz and glam -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:39, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

16:00, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #279

Thanks for the barnstar!

Thank you! It's always great to get a chance to tell a wider audience about the projects and clear up a few misconceptions along the way. --Slashme (talk) 17:52, 26 September 2017 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Great work closing out that discussion on AN about Hidden Tempo RickinBaltimore (talk) 13:49, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
@RickinBaltimore: So far so good.. -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:00, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Self Block Request

I would like to be blocked for 5 days to get away from arguments. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:02, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

 Done -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:13, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

17:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

The speedy was contested by two editors on the talk page. It was deleted without response, discussion or AfD. Do you decide and not the community? And what's the rush? -- GreenC 15:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

@GreenC: Thanks for getting in touch - I saw no credible claim of significance in the article, which made the tagged A7 valid. Devoid any encyclopedic value, the page was just a cheap way of taking a shot at a company. I honestly couldn't care less than the article content was all negative, as Wikipedia contains neutral fact. I don't believe the tagged G10 was overly valid. The arguments on the talk page did not negate the valid A7, and attempted to address issues which didn't even exist ("It's not a copyvio and the material sourced does verify"). That all being said, I prefer to see content kept on Wikipedia than deleted, and I will happily restore the content to draftspace to be worked on. As for what's the rush, please refer to WP:SPEEDY which states "administrators have broad consensus to bypass deletion discussion, at their discretion, and immediately delete Wikipedia pages" -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Ok thanks for the explanation and offer to take to Draft as I think the issues raised might be addressable. I don't have a copy of the original article. -- GreenC 15:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your understanding - I've restored the article to Draft:European Society for Quality Research. Thank you for your contributions! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

I am a brave WP:AFC reviewer and would like to accept Draft:Andrea Iervolino. You create protected this topic back in July. Can you please allow this? ~Kvng (talk) 17:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

@Kvng: Go forth and bravely accept! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Creating temptation

Hello little admin. I see you have created a Delicious Editor. Please don't put temptation in Bishzilla's way. Has practically given up eating editors! bishzilla ROARR!! 09:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC).

Never struck me as Bishzilla being the type to give up! I say keep trying, you'll make it one day -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)
No no, wish to resist addiction to eating delicious little editors. Bishzilla joined twelve-step program, make good progress. Great will-power when not too hungry! bishzilla ROARR!! 13:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC).

A bowl of strawberries for you!

I am unblocked. Bobherry Talk Edits 15:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2017).

Administrator changes

added Boing! said ZebedeeAnsh666Ad Orientem
removed TonywaltonAmiDanielSilenceBanyanTreeMagioladitisVanamonde93Mr.Z-manJdavidbJakecRam-ManYelyosKurt Shaped Box

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Community consultation on the 2017 candidates for CheckUser and Oversight has concluded. The Arbitration Committee will appoint successful candidates by October 11.
  • A request for comment is open regarding the structure, rules, and procedures of the December 2017 Arbitration Committee election, and how to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #280

23:25, 2 October 2017 (UTC)

Lexi Temkin moved to draftspace

With due regards to the earlier thread, I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please do the needful.Warm regards:) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:33, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Hey

I have decided to mess with your draft, hope you don't mind ;-) To be honest, I feel the minor outburst was completely reasonable. I hope one day we can work to address and resolve the divide between editor/admin and content creator/maintenance workers. Warm regards, Alex ShihTalk 12:04, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

@Alex Shih: Not a problem at all It's on my list to try to create that at some point. I don't see a divide, but many do, which is a shame -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:14, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Nextiva

Hello There'sNoTime, I am an Articles for Creation volunteer, and I would like to approve Draft:Nextiva. ISince the article seems to have been created before and has been page-protected, I’m unable to move it there. Would you be willing to do it? I appreciate it! --1990'sguy (talk) 02:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@1990'sguy: I've removed the page protection, so you should now be able to move the article -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:13, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

A note..

Hi,

Greetings:).With due consideration to the recent chain of events, I don't feel Lexi Temkin passes WP:GNG or as such any WP:SNG as of yet. Will you be comfortable with me draftifying it?Regards:)Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:25, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

@Godric on Leave: Sure thing, I believe the notable research she co-lead passes the low-bar of WP:GNG, but I'd much rather continue to work on it in draftspace than it getting AfD'd (I'm not entirely confident it'd survive AfD in its current state!) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:28, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
 Done-Many thanks! Anyways, I will be keeping a watch on your 28-day mission to see if I can help out on any issue.Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:35, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
At any case, consider me as one of those who truly hope that the Maintanence-workers vs Content-Creaters divide fizzles out real soon.Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 08:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
  • I was actually going to talk to you about this too, while PROF is not an exclusionary standard to the GNG, in practice we don't consider people who don't pass PROF to pass the GNG unless it is for something other than their academic work (it can be related, though, for example: someone who has taken their academic research and written a pop-science book that gets great reviews in the NYT). If you want ideas on articles to write for your 28 days, I might be able to think of some depending on your interests. I'm boring though, so they'll likely be less interesting than what you'd have thought up :) TonyBallioni (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
    • I've got to say, it's interesting looking at these policies from this side of the fence - I consider myself to have a detailed understanding of our notability policies (heck, wouldn't be an admin otherwise) but the difference is I know them from the point of view of deleting ("does this article meet a criteria for deleting"). I can see that the predisposition to delete isn't helpful, and that in fact there really shouldn't be any "fence" to be on either side of.. @TonyBallioni: I'd appreciate some suggestions - so far I've been looking at the WiR redlist and grabbing ones which have a few links to possible references. I'll admit, I did start writing Lexi Temkin before looking at notability, oops! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
      • Well, my first comment is that while I get the challenge it might be easier and more benefit for the encyclopedia to go to a stub category you are interested in, find a pre-2010 article that is in dire need of repair, and bring it to DYK and then GA (if it were me, I'd pick something like Papal conclave, May 1555).
        If you want to create articles, probably one of the easiest ways to do it is find someone in the Dictionary of National Biography that looks interesting and write on them. They are automatically notable per WP:ANYBIO, and should be somewhat easy to get a non-stub article there. I can't find if there is a list of DNB entries on Wikipedia right now. I know we have lists of the Canadian version at Template:Dictionary of Canadian Biography, which I've been going through and creating articles on academics and educators. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:52, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
        • A couple of the WiR redlisted articles are in the ODNB, so I'll look at them. The whole 28 day thing is a personal challenge given how much I struggle with finishing a writing project (blog posts, university papers, my dissertation!) but I will definitely have a look at improving some stubs Thanks for the pointers Tony -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Filter 642

Hi TNT.[63] Shouldn't that be [\s_-] ¿ -- zzuuzz (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Checking for a whitespace character there does make a bit more sense ;) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Protection

please protect in semi-protection and 3 days. MarkSewath (talk) 08:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

@MarkSewath: At the moment I'm leaving the page unprotected for a WP:BEANS reason ;-) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:19, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

. User:Pkbwcgs/sandbox needs admin help

so help it.

--86.163.56.182 (talk) 14:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Assuming you're Editingandsorting logged out, the only "help" that page needed was the reverting of your edits. Please leave their draft alone unless you're going to constructively improve it -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Transonic

Aww... And I was just about to explain to the IP the difference between subsonic (<0.75 mach), transonic (0.75-1.0 mach) and supersonic (>1.0 mach). E.g. 747-8 has a max mach of 0.91 which is transonic, not supersonic. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Isn't Wikipedia brilliant - transonic lead me to Prandtl–Glauert singularity which caused me to click through to Singularity (mathematics) and now I'm stuck into Removable singularitys. Suffice to say, I have no idea what I'm reading but it looks impressive... -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
  • If I wasn't working on Heinkel He 112 right now, I would be doing the same thing and going to the same places and having the same lack of clue of what I'm looking at. Indeed, nowhere else on Earth can you start at Porridge and end up at Philosophy just by clicking the first wikilink on every new article. It took a while, but, I got there. Mr rnddude (talk) 15:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar :-)

Thanks for the barnstar! And I appreciate your suggestion to withdraw my RfA. I have learned a lot about the "behind-the-scenes" work that admins (and countless others) do here. And learning is, after all, such an important part of our encyclopedia. I look forward to continue to contribute towards documenting and maintaining the sum of all knowledge. = paul2520 (talk) 14:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

@Paul2520: No problem Indeed it is, and if you ever have any questions, please feel free to leave a message or email me. I look forward to your future RfA! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Congrats on being appointed to the functionary team. I am looking forward to bothering you with petty requests :-) Cheers! Alex ShihTalk 19:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
@Alex Shih: Thank you -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

Concerning your username

The taking of a toast and tea
And indeed there will be time
For the yellow smoke that slides along the street,
Rubbing its back upon the window panes;
There will be time, there will be time
To prepare a face to meet the faces that you meet;
There will be time to murder and create,
And time for all the works and days of hands
That lift and drop a question on your plate;
Time for you and time for me,
And time yet for a hundred indecisions,
And for a hundred visions and revisions,
Before the taking of a toast and tea.
Bishonen | talk 23:34, 7 October 2017 (UTC).
How lovely Bish
Do I dare
Disturb the universe?
In a minute there is time
For decisions and revisions which a minute will reverse.
-- There'sNoTime (to explain) 23:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

There's no time

... I hate to go to the Great Dismal Swamp, because I'd like to write articles. I have been on the receiving end of restrictions, as you may know. It's humiliating to have to ask for mercy, in other words, to appeal. (I was too proud to appeal for two years.) If you have little time: just make that block a fixed time. If you have more time: look for my name on Joe's talk page. I hate to repeat Precious when he's blocked, and it may happen again this month. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Hi Gerda, thank you for your message and for the level-headed approach you bring to difficult situations such as this. I'm genuinely torn in this case, on one hand you have incivility which makes Wikipedia a difficult place to work (and I'm not talking about what is and isn't a personal attack) but on the other the very real fact that I jumped on the report very quickly. The feeling I get at the thread is one which makes me feel foolish for rushing in, but one which supports the idea of something needing to be done. I see the user has been warned and asked to cool off multiple times, and we've escalated up block durations to hopefully try to encourage a change of behaviour.. What is left to do?
Joefromrandb has contributed greatly to Wikipedia, but with an attitude I cannot ignore. To me, there's no ratio of incivility to content which makes behaviour like that justifiable. Please don't get me wrong, I want a resolution here and the restriction ended as soon as possible - I'd unblock immediately if Joefromrandb put their hands up and committed to continue working here without these little outbursts, just as many of our amazing content contributors, such as yourself, manage on a daily basis. As always, I'm open to comment and criticism - if you were in my shoes, what would you do? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 07:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I thought you'd at least read my first thought, about how humiliating it is to expect someone to "put their hands up" and say "I commit to continue working here without these little outbursts". If you have little time, just follow the link from my last comment on his page. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:03, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
I can quite happily stop and see when I've mucked up, and admit to it - that shouldn't be humiliating. I saw the link to this post -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:08, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
If you can happily stop, then do it. - (ec:) About being in your shoes: hard. I am not an admin, and never want to be one. I wrote my little questionaire (which could be subtitled: Do you really think a block is good for Wikipedia?) for a reason. Next time someone makes a report as this one: ignore ignore ignore. I said already above what I'd do if I was you, now that you are already in this mess: make the block a fixed time. Life is too short. (My questions about blocking came up discussing with Kevin, DYK?) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:15, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
A joke, as a token of thanks (from the time when we had DM and Pfennig): Auntie to little Peter: "If you don't use that dirty word again, I give you 10 Pfennig." Peter, in expectation: "I know a word for 50 Pfennig." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

A strong cup of tea

A strong cup for you,

with two lumps of good sugar,

just a splash of cream.

Waggie (talk) 16:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #281

14:21, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to discuss the soon to built, Interaction Timeline

Hi Checkusers and Checkuser clerks,

The Anti-Harassment Tools team is seeking input about building the Interaction Timeline feature.

We’re inviting you to join the discussion because you use similar tools such as the Editor Interaction Analyser and User compare report during sockpuppet investigations.

You can leave comments on the on wiki discussion page or send an email to the Anti-Harassment Tools team.

For the Anti-Harassment Tools team SPoore (WMF), Community Advocate, Community health initiative (talk) 19:39, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please let us know if you wish to opt-out of all massmessage mailings from the Anti-harassment tools team.

hi

hi im new what do i do on here i want to help and be a admin one day thanks Ateenageboy (talk) 13:12, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ateenageboy: Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! To begin with, I'd recommend you complete this training (it won't take too long, and you can do it in parts). Once you've done that, taking the Wikipedia Adventure will teach you important elements of interacting with other editors. Once you've got all that done, drop by my talk page again and I'll run through how you can help remove vandalism and we'll look at getting you the rollback permission -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 13:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
cool thanks bro Ateenageboy (talk) 16:53, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Well done

File:Wikiduck.png
There'sNoTime for well drawn ducks. This will have to do.

Just saw this on your userpage and I have to admit that it made me crack up (or should I say, "quack up"? ;) )...in a library. Well done! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 16:46, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

You were mentioned

Don't know if you have the page watchlisted, but pings aren't working and your presence was requested at User_talk:Amirshahat#unblocking_procesess. Cheers, Primefac (talk) 13:23, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

The ANI about a block

Hello There'sNoTime. If another admin were to try to close the thread about Joefromrandb right now, WP:ANI#Long-term gross incivility and WP:BATTLE they would probably have to say there is no consensus for the block. I figure that there are about 10 people in favor, 7 against and 9 who say that the block was too quick. Ironically, this leaves us uncertain how the 'too quick' people would have voted on the merits. Since the thread has been open more than a week a further shift of opinion seems unlikely. You might choose to just to lift the block and then leave any further action to ANI. In this way you could take yourself out of the loop. I take no position on the block myself. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:33, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Good idea, done so -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 06:23, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
EdJohnston, I wanted to send you a thank-you-click for this, but the "cabal approved" was in its way ;) - You are a member of the cabal by what you do, will repeat it tomorrow (I try to tell only one a day). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:42, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for the unblock. Could you find a short message for Joe, beyond the edit summary? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:47, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #282

Wikidata weekly summary #282

Talkback

Hello, TheresNoTime. You have new messages at Biografer's talk page.
Message added 16:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

His competency at welcoming new users is too good to be comfortable:) Winged Blades of GodricOn leave 16:50, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Godric is just a cry wolf, can't believe that people like him are allowed to edit here.--Biografer (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

No barnstar, just words

Just dropping by because of this: I am here to express my admiration for your courage and accountability in the administrative actions you take, which takes a lot of character and I respect you both as a fellow editor and administrator. The attacks against you were simply unfair, especially when you are making these calls in the interest of the community. Warm regards, Alex ShihTalk 06:49, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Don't fret. There's a proclivity these days to jump all over just about anything like this, it'll soon be yesterday's news. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:52, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017


Smash!

You've been squished by a whale!
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know you did something really silly.

Bobherry Talk Edits 12:59, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
  • We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.

Technology update:

  • Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Formatting of Pages of Singapore MRT Lines

Hello.

I seek your assistance regarding the article guidelines of certain pages on the Singapore MRT network.

A few months ago, some users started adding an excessive amount (in my opinion) of unnecessary colours into tables and articles. They evidently cite the reason as to closely mimic the style of the local transport, which feature station codes in ovals. As I had been on hiatus, I did not notice it until recently. See links for examples.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Downtown_MRT_Line#Stations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circle_MRT_Line#Stations

Having maintained the pages for many years, I find this absolutely unnecessary as it clutters up the articles. I seem to recall reading guidelines that stipulate the use of colours in articles, but unfortunately, I am unable to find it and cite it in my discussions with Irobotboy. Attempting to remove the coloured codes only result in him adding them back. I have already posted a message to his talkpage but he evidently responded on another user's page. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:1.02_editor#Stations_for_Downtown_Line) I therefore replied to his query but he has not answered. As I had already "reverted" his edits twice, I find myself unable to respond to his latest activities without involving myself in an edit war.

I seek your opinion on the matter. This is without precedent as I have been unable to find examples of any other metro network utilizing station codes.

Thank you

Seloloving (talk) 13:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

One place which mentions colour in articles is WP:Manual of Style/Text formatting#In prose, which I referred to in various edit summaries on these articles, and in this edit to User_talk:Irobotboy. - David Biddulph (talk) 11:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Link

Not sure if you want to link to this or not, but here it is: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DeepNikita. GMGtalk 20:27, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

@GreenMeansGo: Much obliged! Your response to their message on your talk made my evening -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
I speak only truth and wisdom. GMGtalk 20:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

November editathons from Women in Red: Join us!

Welcome to Women in Red's November 2017 worldwide online editathons.


New: The Women in Red World Contest

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

-Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:19, 21 October 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 23 October 2017

18:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #283

Wikidata weekly summary #282

Wikidata weekly summary #284

00:20, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

OTRS query

I'm trying to do some OTRS cleanup.

As brief background, DGG locked a number of tickets, and in some cases began a discussion with the customer. In some cases, he has not begun a discussion with the customer. As you know, he is now very active with Arbcom, and unable to devote enough time to OTRS tickets. In cases where DGG initiated a discussion I am taking them over. In the case of ticket:2016021510020372, you are the only agent involved. Would you be willing to do an update? It has been some time, so it may be worth starting with a question whether the issue is still open in their minds.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:14, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick: I'm currently taking some time away from Wikipedia/OTRS etc., so I would recommend asking someone else. Apologies -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Seeking advice...

Hi There'sNoTime. You mentioned I could reach out any time with questions, so here I am. A user has been editing Michael Lovell to add the "worst university president" award. Them and I have been in discussion here. As the latest discussion comes from a new IP address, it looks like there have been three IP addresses involved, but seem to be the same person.

Am I wrong in my arguments that this "award" should not be included in the article? I was hoping someone else who watches the page might weigh-in, but that hasn't happened yet. The reference they provide looks to be a blog/editorial, and not a reliable source (please help me understand if I am wrong).

Their latest comment calls me "a subordinate of Michael Lovell" (I am not). Should I reply to the comment? Should I give them one more chance before requesting an admin to protect the page? Or am I wrong, and this "award" should be included?

Oh, and I just realized now that Lovell was considered a runner-up - so he didn't really receive the "award" to begin with. = paul2520 (talk) 18:10, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

@Paul2520: I'm currently taking some time away from Wikipedia etc., so I would recommend asking someone else. Apologies -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 17:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: Thanks for the reply. Enjoy your time off. = paul2520 (talk) 17:21, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) I dropped a line on the article talk page. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:39, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
Thank you, Ad Orientem. I really appreciate you weighing-in. And nice to learn about talk page stalkers. = paul2520 (talk) 21:17, 29 October 2017 (UTC)
NP. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:24, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!

@Linguist111: Thank you! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 19:52, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

If this is wrong......

Earlier you placed a semi on The Shield article here, a user removed it here while adding more inaccurate info, I went and restored your previous edit here. If my restoring of this is wrong please let me know, Thanks Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 22:18, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: All good! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

The semi you placed on The Shield article expires on Nov 6 I believe. Can that be extended? Because if the whole Kurt Angle/Shield member false info thing wasnt bad enough now there is this. I suspect there will be edits in mass to the Shield article and it will either because an edit war with editors and IPs or worse someone is gonna get 3RR trying to end the nonsense. Per current consensus If you look at the talk page under Kurt Angle you will see where several folks said No to Angle being a member which him being added over and over by IPs is what started the semi protect because it's false information, he replaced an ill member for one night. Now HHH replaced the same ill member for one night overseas and Im afraid once the semi is lifted it will be the same thing all over again for this HHH nonsense. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 00:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

@WarMachineWildThing: Hmm, I'm not the biggest fan of extending a protection without seeing if the article can be edited constructively, but I can see where you're coming from. I'll have a look at the situation. It may be worth allowing the protection to lapse, but taking a stance of re-protecting at the first instance of disruption? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 11:39, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Works for me. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" Talk to me 11:48, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

1 Novemeber

(in response to message left on my talk page) Hey thanks for letting me know, and will do. Also on a side note what sort of permissions can i request that will aid me in stopping vandalism or protecting pages constantly being vandalised thanks JoshuaLawlerWiki (talk) 09:08, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

@JoshuaLawlerWiki: Hi, first off I would recommend going through the Wikipedia Adventure, which is an interactive tutorial. After you've completed that, we can have a look at permissions such as rollback and how to correctly deal with vandalism -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:11, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: Ok sure thing, I will check it out! Thanks JoshuaLawlerWiki (talk) 09:19, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2017).

Administrator changes

added LonghairMegalibrarygirlTonyBallioniVanamonde93
removed Allen3Eluchil404Arthur RubinBencherlite

Technical news

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • The Wikipedia community has recently learned that Allen3 (William Allen Peckham) passed away on December 30, 2016, the same day as JohnCD. Allen began editing in 2005 and became an administrator that same year.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #285

18:45, 6 November 2017 (UTC)


Help for AfD Previsouly you saved the article about [[81]] from PROD. Now it got back into AfD, can you contribute to save the page. Bwjones88 (talk) 03:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2017





Headlines
  • Australia and New Zealand report: Adding Australian women in research to Wikipedia
  • Brazil report: Integrating Wikimedia projects into the Brazilian National Archives GLAM
  • Bulgaria report: Botevgrad became the first wikitown in Bulgaria
  • France report: Wiki Loves Monuments; Opérations Libres
  • Germany report: GLAMorous activities in October
  • Italy report: Experts training on GLAM projects
  • Serbia report: Wikipedian in residence at Historical Archives of Subotica; Model of a grain of wheat exlusivly digitized for Wikimedia Commons; Cooperation of the Ministry of Culture and Information and Wikimedia Serbia - GLAM presentations and workshops for museums, archives and libraries
  • Spain report: Women Writers Day
  • Sweden report: Swedish Performing Arts Agency; Connected Open Heritage; Internetmuseum; More Working life museums
  • UK report: Scotland's Libraries & Hidden Gems
  • Ukraine report: Wikitraining for Librarians; Library Donation
  • USA report: trick or treat
  • Wikidata report: WikidataCon & Birthday
  • WMF GLAM report: News about Structured Commons!
  • Calendar: November's GLAM events
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #286

Hello, I am Chris I just want to recreate the page called Mayestron (rapper) which you deleted on the 22 February, 2017. The article was created by Papamayani which is now already banned on Wikipedia. I just contact you because the page told me, if I want to recreate it, I need first contact you, that why I contacted you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrislogan (talkcontribs) 09:22, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

@Chrislogan: I'd recommend creating a draft first -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Talk pages

What is the best way to make other users agree with you on a talk page discussion? DBZFan30 (talk) 02:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Well? Aren't you going to respond? DBZFan30 (talk) 14:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Excuse me? -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
There's no way to make other users agree with you. If you're looking to force people to agree with you on a point, you're contributing to the wrong project -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Spartan Race

Today I came across User:Jkxyz/Spartan race, a copy of the article now at Spartan Race that you created for dispute resolution back around the start of 2016. The editor whose userspace you created this in has been blocked for legal threats and generally abusive behaviour, and it's likely that this form of the article contains BLP violations. Do you know of any good reason to keep the draft? Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 13:54, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: Thank you for checking with me, but no, I see no reason to keep it -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Okay just one more question: do you happen to know where this dispute resolution discussion occurred? I can't find it in the DRN archives. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I'm looking through my archives now, as I have a feeling at least some of it occurred on my talk page -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:35, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for checking, but I've elected to go in a different direction. I'll have a better look at the draft later to see if there's anything useful and then I think it should probably go through MfD. Cheers. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:01, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

User:GünniX1

You blocked GünniX1. I think they might be related to the account MacauMagic. -- Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 14:38, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

@Emir of Wikipedia: Thanks for the heads-up, I'm working my way through these one by one -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I think it might be worth you looking at User_talk:Spartaz#Sabrina_Ho. The accounts might not be related to these but they are still troublesome. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 11:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

the template hack is spreading...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Big_Lebowski

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python_and_the_Holy_Grail

unsure where else. since you dealt with one page before, thought i'd tell you.

peace


out.

5.145.141.155 (talk) 14:42, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

A quick purge of those pages sorts it out, but thank you for letting me know -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:43, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Roysandytei unblock request

Hi, please see this unblock request and accompanying discussion at User talk:Owula kpakpo#Wikipedia Ghana user group/Daniel Kobe Ricks Jr. Thanks. TJRC (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

....And I just saw that you're already involved in that discussion, so you can probably ignore this notification. TJRC (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #287

Wikidata weekly summary #287 Global message delivery/Targets/Wikidata

15:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Dear There'sNoTime,

please reconsider your block of User:Roysandytei. See here: Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Unblocking of User:Roysandytei. --Gereon K. (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

@Gereon K.: I've replied at the AN post and unblocked the user pending a review of the findings -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:02, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 November 2017

WiR December highlights

Welcome to Women in Red's December 2017 worldwide online editathons.


New: "Seasonal celebrations" "First Ladies" "Go local!"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

Remember the World Contest closes on Thursday, 30 November

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

--Ipigott (talk) 13:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #288

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

How dare you???

All of you remove my post again n again. Then??? I just added all Channels name under Zee in ZMCL page. Cuty Pie Sweetu (talk) 14:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

@Cuty Pie Sweetu: Calm down, take a moment away from Wikipedia, and then nicely talk to Clubjustin -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:26, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Hardy Rex Features.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Ave Fenix ​Pictures

Hi, I'm an employee of Ave Fenix ​​Pictures, a few months ago you deleted the article Ave Fenix ​​Pictures since it had been created by an editor who worked outside the Wikipedia rules. We think that hiring an editor would be the best option because we do not know how to edit the platform, but we had no idea that the editor worked without following the rules. I want to know if there is any possibility that we propose a draft of the article, to put it to your consideration, we know that we can not edit ourselves directly. Can we have that possibility? We could do a translation of the Spanish version. Thank you..Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

@Michael.j.schwartz: Hi, thanks for getting in contact. I would first advise you to read through our FAQ for organisations (Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations). It would indeed be possible for you to work on a draft, and I would suggest you do this through the article wizard. If you have any further questions, The Teahouse will be happy to help -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 12:10, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Cheers. 7&6=thirteen () 20:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Tomo 557755

Hi There'sNoTime,

A few weeks back you deleted the article "Moxie (composer)". Looking at the deletion criteria listed, I believe that in its previous state the deletion of the article was fair. I'm still a novice when it comes to article creation and editing on Wikipedia.

But I think with some more research, article comparison, checking of Wikipedias guidelines and editing, I can get better and make the article acceptable.

Is any possibility that you can access the Wiki markup/Wikicode of the removed article and send it to me? I'm happy to start from scratch on the article if need be but if the Wiki markup/Wikicode still exists somewhere it would be handy to have to start my revisions and editing upon.

Thanks for your time There'sNoTime :)

Tomo 557755 (talk) 10:01, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

@Tomo 557755: Hey, thanks for getting in touch - I've restored the content to the draft Draft:Moxie (composer) where you can continue to work on it. Once you're ready to submit it for review (using WP:AFC), add the code {{subst:submit}} to the top of the page -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 10:14, 29 November 2017 (UTC)


Great! Thanks for that There'sNoTime! Have a great day!

Tomo 557755 (talk) 10:34, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 159.122.86.43 (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

159.122, good spot, thank you for holding me accountable to my actions. Was indeed a muck up. tpw et al., thread -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 22:05, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Nipun Jaswal Page Restoration

Dear Admin,

Few months ago, you deleted a page called "Nipun Jaswal" due to non notability of the author or his books which was a fair decision. However, as the time passed by the author is now listed in google with his books. Do you think a restore is possible? I can try editing the page if you agree. Thanks--Rafiq Marbaros (talk) 08:31, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

@Rafiqmarbaros: Perhaps - could you link to the article I deleted? (Nipun Jaswal has never existed it appears) -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 22:32, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: this is the message i get opening the page, your link is correct... "10:06, 5 August 2017 There'sNoTime (talk | contribs) deleted page Nipun Jaswal (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nipun Jaswal (XFDcloser))"--Rafiq Marbaros (talk) 04:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
@Rafiqmarbaros: I must have manually looked up the title, and then copy/pasted for the link - anywho, I have restored it to Draft:Nipun Jaswal for you to work on. Please submit it through WP:AFC when you're ready -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 09:41, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
@There'sNoTime: Thank you so much, i ll work on itRafiq Marbaros (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 20:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mahveotm (talk) 20:22, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

@Mahveotm: Got it, just reviewing now -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2017).

Administrator changes

added Joe Roe
readded JzG
removed EricorbitPercevalThinggTristanbVioletriga

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, a new section has been added to the username policy which disallows usernames containing emoji, emoticons or otherwise "decorative" usernames, and usernames that use any non-language symbols. Administrators should discuss issues related to these types of usernames before blocking.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Over the last few months, several users have reported backlogs that require administrator attention at WP:ANI, with the most common backlogs showing up on WP:SPI, WP:AIV and WP:RFPP. It is requested that all administrators take some time during this month to help clear backlogs wherever possible. It should be noted that AIV reports are not always valid; however, they still need to be cleared, which may include needing to remind users on what qualifies as vandalism.
  • The Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative is conducting a survey for English Wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works (i.e. which problems it deals with well and which problems it struggles with). If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be emailed to you via Special:EmailUser.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

17:51, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #289

Banned User

User:Cuty Pie Sweetu, a user you banned temporarily is back to his edit warring using an IP address. --Xzinger (talk) 04:37, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

IP hasn't edited for a couple of days, and it may be dynamic - if you see anything again though, please feel free to poke me. Thanks for keeping an eye out! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 22:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)
Cuty Pie Sweetu used that IP to circumvent the temporary ban imposed on him for edit waring. Isn't circumventing a violation of the ban? Morever he is back to adding that long list of television stations even though a template with the same channel list is present on that article.--Xzinger (talk) 03:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Adminerversary

Why thank you -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:02, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
Fun was had by all
Couple days belated, but happy adminervary (adminversary? )! --TheSandDoctor (talk) 06:09, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #290

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 December 2017

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

14:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #291

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

A Florida IHOP for you

Pancakes!
Merry Christmas, may your days be filled with all the pancakes from Florida that you can eat. TonyBallioni (talk) 04:45, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
IHOPe for IHOP -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:25, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Thanks for everything Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 14:41, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
I'm good at all the "everything"s - "messing up everything", "utterly ruining everything", "losing everything"...... -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 14:26, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

deleted sandbox jazz re:freshed

hi there, im new to wikipedia i believe you deleted my sandbox page for copyright violation - the copyright material was actually from my website and written by me... is there any way to get the deleted text back? i (foolishly) composed the post in wikipedia and will now have to rewrite the whole thing again... :( adam Jazzrefreshed (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

@Jazzrefreshed: Hi Adam, I'll email over the content of your draft to you - please don't re-add it to Wikipedia just yet. The message I left on your user page has some helpful links in regard to copyright, so I'd recommend having a read through of those. Let me know if I can help! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 00:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

thank you so much - your email has not come through tho... ive been having a few issues with my emails could you email it to adamrocked@hotmail.com instead please thank you for your support adam Jazzrefreshed (talk) 23:32, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2018!

Hello There'sNoTime, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2018. May you and your family have a Happy, Safe and Prosperous New Year!
Happy editing,
--Cameron11598 (Talk) 05:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #292

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Ave Fenix Pictures

Hello, a few days ago I wrote to you to see the possibility of publishing an article of Ave Fenix Pictures, which was previously deleted because it was uploaded by a banned user - my message and your answer are in your file, 27th and 28th of November -. I have the article in my Sandbox, could you check it? (Note since my publication was archived I did not know if I should contact you again. My apologies as I do not have experience in these cases). It is a translation of the Spanish version, with some phrases that I have added, I have even changed a link that in the Spanish version is broken. Could you publish it yourself, or another editor, if you think it's appropriate? Thanks! Michael.j.schwartz (talk) 06:08, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@Michael.j.schwartz: I've moved the page to Draft:Ave Fenix Pictures and submitted it for review -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:00, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Yo Ho Ho

ϢereSpielChequers 20:54, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

@WereSpielChequers: you too WSC! Hope you've had a great 2017! Always nice to hear from my RfA nom -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 20:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Thanks yes, an interesting year, though I've not been so active at RFA! ϢereSpielChequers 22:18, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
Hopefully a good interesting year - and please do be more active at RfA, there's plenty of people we can throw under the bus induct into the admin corp! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 22:25, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

@RileyBugz: Thanks, hope you have a nice festive period too! For what its worth, I celebrate Yule -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 00:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

@Miles Edgeworth: Merry Christmas to you too! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas !!!

CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:37, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

@CAPTAIN RAJU: Merry Christmas to you as well! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:20, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

  • Hi TNT, I'm so sorry!, You were on my crimbo list but for whatever reason it never made it to you so here you are sorry it's so late :(, Have a Crimbo & New Year :), –Davey2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 15:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
    • No drama, I forget to send actual cards let alone on here! Have a good one Davey -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 15:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Have a good one! -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 22:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Happy Holidays

The white snow and the cool breeze beckon a festive mood,
And the sweet aroma wafting from eateries wreathes the mind.
Lights, stars, colour and jollity abound 'round each bend,
I wish you a happy holiday season, dear friend.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Editing can get tough and frustrating at times, but we've come a long way in this project and that is a grand achievement. Hope you have a good time this festive season! :) Jiten talk contribs 23:35, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

Merry Christmas

A blessed feast to you and yours. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:21, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

New Year's resolution: Write more articles for Women in Red!

Welcome to Women in Red's January 2018 worldwide online editathons.



New: "Prisoners"

New: "Fashion designers"

New: "Geofocus: Great Britain and Ireland"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC) via MassMessaging

leave the editor alone?

Wth? Why did you say this and what is the basis for it? Seraphim System (talk) 18:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC) Seraphim System (talk) 18:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Well its pretty clear neither of you can work together. You leave them alone, they'll leave you alone, we can all move on and do something constructive -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 18:40, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
I don't think he's willing to do that. I looked at his editing pattern too and there isn't much overlap. Here's a summary of my interaction with him:
  • called me a denialist, [137] (No, removing Lemkin from the LEDE is not denialist - premediated should not be in the lede - it hasn't become part of the definition of genocide, it is confusing, and it is undue for the lede. I would have replaced it with something better if he hadn't started this battleground bs).
  • edit warred over restoring a text sandwich: [138]
  • reverted a closed RfC: [139]
  • restored a POV map that fails verification with a nonsense caption that says "The traditional definition of Anatolia within modern Turkey" [140]
  • continues to argue that it was not miscited, does not fail verification and that the map was sourced to the entire book (not a particular map in the book), says I should take it up with the map creator if the caption fails verification: [141]

If he is unable to work with me, then I want him to leave me alone so I can improve the articles that I want to work on. I actually am capable of editing neutrally in this area, it isn't my POV that is causing these disputes. Restoring a text sandwich is not even legitimate, it is pure stalking/battleground behavior.Seraphim System (talk) 19:35, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

Sorry

I was snippier here than I meant to be in my edit summary here. (Intended snippiness 4/10, came out 7/10.) EEng 08:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

@EEng: I've been debating leaving you a snippiness 3 "the heck is community capital", but decided against it - no harm, no foul. I'm not going touch that thread again, I'll let an admin with some more community capital mull that one over -- There'sNoTime (to explain) 08:30, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
But there is a real foul (neither yours nor mine) in terms of what's happening with Tony1 now, and community discussion raising awareness of hasty application of NLT is long overdue. I'm hoping to stimulate that, just so you understand. EEng 08:42, 28 December 2017 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Hardy Rex Features.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, There'sNoTime!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Happy New Year, There'sNoTime!

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #293

Administrators' newsletter – January 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2017).

Administrator changes

added Muboshgu
readded AnetodeLaser brainWorm That Turned
removed None

Bureaucrat changes

readded Worm That Turned

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment is in progress to determine whether the administrator policy should be amended to require disclosure of paid editing activity at WP:RFA and to prohibit the use of administrative tools as part of paid editing activity, with certain exceptions.

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #294

This Month in GLAM: December 2017





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

aw

you're monitoring me <3 OfficialAnti4chanredditadpromobish (talk) 20:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

It's the least I could do - TNT 20:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #295

18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Sweep, sweep, sweep

Just what you signed up for, huh? --NeilN talk to me 04:10, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

@NeilN: Woooo, right? I still remember your advice from when I was overly keen to RfA.. you should have said how fun and interesting adminship was - TNT 04:12, 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Oops

My bad. I have no idea how to request a revdel or if there is a board for that. I'm also up to my chin in sockpuppets, at the moment so I kind did that kind of hastily. Boomer VialBe ready to fight the horde!Contribs 11:35, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

@Boomer Vial: Not a problem at all Because it was personal information, your best bet is popping an email to oversight - saves drawing any attention to the content (as ideally we want as few people to see it as possible!). As for sockpuppets, I saw your post on Osh's talk page - I was close to doing a check on them, but formatting a SPI up would be helpful - TNT 11:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
Will do. I know the aforementioned socks are related for sure, having just spent the last half hour digging through the last twenty thousand created accounts digging all of them up. In case you still wanted to CheckUser them, no objections here. Boomer VialBe ready to fight the horde!Contribs 11:43, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
@Boomer Vial: That was a pretty major SPI.. at least it helped isolate the unrelated accounts. As for the master, a clerk will pop by and move the SPI, so no drama - TNT 12:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Rainbow Kitten Surprise

Just curious why you deleted the Rainbow Kitten Surprise page. They are signed to Elektra Records, a major label with a new single out and first LP due in April. [1] Marc61 (talk) 20:28, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

The article met CSD A7 and the AfD was speedy closed as such - TNT 20:35, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Signing to a such a major label as Electra is an indication of notability, so I don't think A7 applies. Note this is an indication, not proof, of notability. That said, when I look at the deleted text I think the article was correctly speedily deleted, but the better criteria would be WP:G11. That's just my opinion, though. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:54, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Maybe this helps - From Time Magazine this week. [2][3] I'm a huge fan of the band (obviously) and just wanted recognition for starting the page.

Not looking to start an argument. Marc61 (talk)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Robert Hardy Rex Features.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

23:56, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #296

00:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Feburary 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's February 2018 worldwide online editathons.

New: "Black women"

New: "Mathematicians and statisticians"

New: "Geofocus: Island women"

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wikidata weekly summary #297

17:07, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #298

The Signpost: 5 February 2018

Administrators' newsletter – February 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed BlurpeaceDana boomerDeltabeignetDenelson83GrandioseSalvidrim!Ymblanter

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC has closed with a consensus that candidates at WP:RFA must disclose whether they have ever edited for pay and that administrators may never use administrative tools as part of any paid editing activity, except when they are acting as a Wikipedian-in-Residence or when the payment is made by the Wikimedia Foundation or an affiliate of the WMF.
  • Editors responding to threats of harm can now contact the Wikimedia Foundation's emergency address by using Special:EmailUser/Emergency. If you don't have email enabled on Wikipedia, directly contacting the emergency address using your own email client remains an option.

Technical news

  • A tag will now be automatically applied to edits that blank a page, turn a page into a redirect, remove/replace almost all content in a page, undo an edit, or rollback an edit. These edits were previously denoted solely by automatic edit summaries.

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

The Catholic Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania

Hi,

It looks like my recent draft for The Catholic Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania (CHSWPA) was deleted because of the blocking for copyright infringement back in the summer. Just some background - I am a member of the board of directors for CHSWPA, treasurer, in charge of the website, co-editor of the journal Gathered Fragments, etc. My fellow board member and co-editor, John, had originally wanted as much information on our Wikipedia page as possible. So, we took what we have on our website and revised it slightly - we do own the copyright on that. Well, apparently, that can't be done so I told him that we would try something basic.

I finally got around to taking another stab at it, just doing the bare bones and apparently I can't do that either because of the original block from the summer. I had John review what I wrote yesterday and he said go ahead and try to post. I returned to Wikipedia today and found that what I had written had been deleted because of the summer block. If you go to the following website http://digital.library.duq.edu:2012/cdm/search/collection/gf/searchterm/Kathleen%20Washy/field/all/mode/all/conn/and/order/title/ad/asc, you will see my name pop up and you should be able to verify that I am a board member that way. Duquesne University is in the middle of creating a new website to hold past issues of Gathered Fragments, but it is still in early stages and I don't think it is out there for the public but you can look at it here and you will see my name: https://ddc.duq.edu/chs/ There are days that I feel that I am the living history of CHSWPA as I have been a board member since 1992 - 26 years. However, one other board member has me beat as she has 34 years.

What can I do to get my bare bones submission into the mix? Below was my bare bones draft from yesterday. Should I chop it down even more?

Any advice would be appreciated.

Kathleen Washy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwashy (talkcontribs)

@Kwashy: Hi Kathleen, thanks for getting in contact - firstly apologies for "hiding" the text you initially wrote on my user page, if you go to edit this page you'll see it's still there. As for Draft:The Catholic Historical Society of Western Pennsylvania, it was deleted as a copyright violation (see this page) so you've got two options - re-factor the text from the other day so it significantly differs from the copyrighted material on your website or donate the text.
Apologies for the inconvenience all this must have caused, and please do let me know if you need any more help. Alternatively, you could ask for some assistance at The Teahouse or visit our live chat. Also, because you're writing about something you have a direct connection to, you'll need to declare your conflict of interest - TNT 16:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
20:51, 5 February 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revdels. --NeilN talk to me 17:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

No problem NeilN :-) - TNT 22:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

It occurs to me that I've not ~properly~ interacted with you on enwiki yet, so This is That.

-- Thanks, Alfie. talk to me | contribs 22:53, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

N'aww thankies Alfie =3 - TNT 22:56, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: January 2018





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #299

Hillmann 69

How are these three edits not linkspam?[194][195][196] Note that the page linked to says "Michael Hillmann, Managing Director". --Guy Macon (talk) 02:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Hi, that is correct. These external links were added (with my previous account name) due to my wrong understanding of Wikipedia, years ago - and, of course, some competitors are doing this as well. Now I want to add more valuable knowledge to wikipedia and will remove these links now... Sorry.

--TecWriter (talk) 11:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Ah. Thanks for the explanation. If you see any competitors who are spamming links to their sites, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page and I will deal with them. --Guy Macon (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

The Barnstar of Diplomacy
<iDangerMouse> After White_cat you're the second annoying cat on Wikipedia
Dax Bane 20:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
@Dax Bane: Thank you, I think! ^..^ - TNT 21:01, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
21:59, 12 February 2018 (UTC)

[🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #300

[🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

I apologize for any grammatical or syntax errors in advance I am a retired Navy veteran and I have a site impediment as well as a hearing Disorder so I have to use voice recognition software to try and learn how to become a Wikipedia editor.

Where did the four take effect for this website was it from the beginning of time?

I also would like to know if the beginning of this website from what I could tell was started by one person or two I'm having conflicting stories on how Wikipedia started it looks like it was two people and then one bought the other one out is that right?

[🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC) [🇺🇸 COACH Z | #USNavy ⚓] 00:03, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Veiled (movie)

Hello, There'sNoTime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Veiled".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 18:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Sometimes Twinkle sends the notifications to other editors that handled a page. Ya, it might be spam too. Legacypac (talk) 18:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Dangit TNT... not again. GMGtalk 18:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
One of our most prolific spammers, eh GNG—and always gets away with it, right under our dang noses!  :) >SerialNumber54129...speculates 18:46, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Nothing to see here... - TNT 19:00, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
22:55, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Women's History Month 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's March 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Historically, our March event has been one of the biggest offerings of the year. This year, we are collaborating with two other wiki communities. Our article campaign is the official on-line/virtual node for Art+Feminism. Our image campaign supports the Whose Knowledge? initiative. Women's History Month 2018

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 20 February 2018

Wikidata weekly summary #301

SPI and backlinks

Hi. I was wondering, if I link an article in an SPI page (using [[xyz]]), does it show in the article's "what links here" while the SPI is still open? That's why I had to exclude wikilinks from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jwalia012. —usernamekiran(talk) 19:46, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

@Usernamekiran: Any [[wiki link]] will show up in "what links here" for the page, but I wouldn't let that stop you wikilinking at SPI (to the contrary, wikilinks can often help a lot in making judgement calls). On a side note, I've seen a couple of your SPIs and they're always really well thought out - so thank you! - TNT 19:51, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
If you (not totally sure why) want to avoid these types of backlinks (words?), you can use [[Special:Permalink/123456789|PAGENAME]] to link to the latest revision instead of the live article. GMGtalk 19:54, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
(edit conflict) lol thanks. I will keep that in mind; to include the wikilinks.
Thanks for the tip Tim. But given TNT's explanation, I think I should add the wikilinks. See you around guys :) —usernamekiran(talk) 19:59, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 11:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Mahveotm (talk) 11:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mahveotm: replied - TNT 16:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)

ACC CU Backlog

Hello,

ACC has a CU backlog of 101 requests as of 08:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC), any help is appreciated! Thanks ~riley (talk) 08:34, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Some stew for you

Wikimedia Stew
Congratulations! Just make sure not to global lock me :) TonyBallioni (talk) 18:52, 28 February 2018 (UTC)
Oh thank you It is -3 here so that's rather helpful! - TNT 19:04, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you!
plz do not lock kitten

kitten is frund?

Anyway, congratulations on being a steward! !dave 21:48, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@!Dave Thank you! - TNT 14:57, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2018

Read this in another languageSubscription list for the English WikipediaSubscription list for the multilingual edition

Did you know?

Did you know that you can now use the visual diff tool on any page?

Screenshot showing some changes, in the two-column wikitext diff display

Sometimes, it is hard to see important changes in a wikitext diff. This screenshot of a wikitext diff (click to enlarge) shows that the paragraphs have been rearranged, but it does not highlight the removal of a word or the addition of a new sentence.

If you enable the Beta Feature for "⧼visualeditor-preference-visualdiffpage-label⧽", you will have a new option. It will give you a new box at the top of every diff page. This box will let you choose either diff system on any edit.

Toggle button showing visual and wikitext options; visual option is selected

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

In the visual diff, additions, removals, new links, and formatting changes will be highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

Screenshot showing the same changes to an article. Most changes are highlighted with text formatting.

This screenshot shows the same edit as the wikitext diff. The visual diff highlights the removal of one word and the addition of a new sentence. An arrow indicates that the paragraph changed location.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode, which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Their work board is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

  • The 2017 wikitext editor is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. It has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. The team have been comparing the performance of different editing environments. They have studied how long it takes to open the page and start typing. The study uses data for more than one million edits during December and January. Some changes have been made to improve the speed of the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual editor. Recently, the 2017 wikitext editor opened fastest for most edits, and the 2010 WikiEditor was fastest for some edits. More information will be posted at mw:Contributors/Projects/Editing performance.
  • The visual diff tool was developed for the visual editor. It is now available to all users of the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. When you review your changes, you can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. You can also enable the new Beta Feature for "Visual diffs". The Beta Feature lets you use the visual diff tool to view other people's edits on page histories and Special:RecentChanges. [221]
  • Wikitext syntax highlighting is available as a Beta Feature for both the 2017 wikitext editor and the 2010 wikitext editor. [222]
  • The citoid service automatically translates URLs, DOIs, ISBNs, and PubMed id numbers into wikitext citation templates. This tool has been used at the English Wikipedia for a long time. It is very popular and useful to editors, although it can be tricky for admins to set up. Other wikis can have this service, too. Please read the instructions. You can ask the team to help you enable citoid at your wiki.

Let's work together

  • The team is planning a presentation about editing tools for an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting.
  • Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and other communities may have the visual editor made available by default to contributors. If your community wants this, then please contact Dan Garry.
  • The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. This has already been enabled at the English Wikipedia. If you want columns for a long list of footnotes on this wiki, you can use either <references /> or the plain (no parameters) {{reflist}} template. If you edit a different wiki, you can request multi-column support for your wiki. [223]
  • If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!

User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2018).

Administrator changes

added Lourdes
removed AngelOfSadnessBhadaniChris 73CorenFridayMidomMike V
† Lourdes has requested that her admin rights be temporarily removed, pending her return from travel.

Guideline and policy news

  • The autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) is scheduled to end on 14 March 2018. The results of the research collected can be read on Meta Wiki.
  • Community ban discussions must now stay open for at least 24 hours prior to being closed.
  • A change to the administrator inactivity policy has been proposed. Under the proposal, if an administrator has not used their admin tools for a period of five years and is subsequently desysopped for inactivity, the administrator would have to file a new RfA in order to regain the tools.
  • A change to the banning policy has been proposed which would specify conditions under which a repeat sockmaster may be considered de facto banned, reducing the need to start a community ban discussion for these users.

Technical news

  • CheckUsers are now able to view private data such as IP addresses from the edit filter log, e.g. when the filter prevents a user from creating an account. Previously, this information was unavailable to CheckUsers because access to it could not be logged.
  • The edit filter has a new feature contains_all that edit filter managers may use to check if one or more strings are all contained in another given string.

Miscellaneous

Obituaries

  • Bhadani (Gangadhar Bhadani) passed away on 8 February 2018. Bhadani joined Wikipedia in March 2005 and became an administrator in September 2005. While he was active, Bhadani was regarded as one of the most prolific Wikipedians from India.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

A few favors

Can you do the following favors for me:

  1. Delete my user page.
  2. Delete my talk page.
  3. Change my username so other users can stop harrassing me. DBZFan30 (talk) 02:45, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@DBZFan30: Hi, sorry to hear you've been experiencing harassment here - please feel free to email me if you want to discuss the above in more detail, and I'll try to help where I can. On to your query:
  1. Your user page seems to have already been deleted.
  2. We very rarely delete talk pages - you can, however, blank the page. Would this be okay?
  3. I'm unable to rename your account. This page may help in regards to changing your username, though you may be looking for "courtesy vanishing". Before you make that choice, I'd strongly recommend dropping me an email with what's been going on, because I might be able to help you.
- TNT 10:01, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
I just want my talk page to be permanently deleted so I won't have to look back at all the trash people keep posting there. For the harassment part, I remember when a user kept calling me a "twat" and a "twit" over a section at the article All Star (song) (check the edit history for evidence). That same user then started harassing me at the talk page of that article. I also want the All Star article to be deleted. You have to believe me on this. DBZFan30 (talk) 18:23, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Not this again. DBZFan30 (talk) 22:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) DBZFan30, I'm not sure what There'sNoTime is doing to you, but he's given you good advice (no admin is going to delete your user talk page, and he currently does not have the ability to rename you.)
For your other requests, There'sNoTime is probably not going to delete one of the most popular songs of the late-1990s/early-2000s just because, and it is not very likely to be deleted at AfD. I also looked at the edit summaries there, and the content, and I don't see anything that meets our revision deletion criteria. The talk page issue and relevant content dispute from what I can tell was almost a year ago, and you also got into a content dispute in October, which is also pretty stale. All of these issues seem to be too old for much administrative action.
If you are concerned about people reverting you or something similar because of your current username, a rename should do the trick, and maybe don't edit the All Star page again if it is causing the issues? All the best, TonyBallioni (talk) 22:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@TonyBallioni: Can you at least delete my talk page and permanently block the user who was harassing me? That user at the All Star article always gets away with everything. I'm sick of it. I'm also sick of other users not believing or listening to me. Wikipedia really needs to change their rules and revision deletion criteria. Also, I'm not "stalking" this page at all. DBZFan30 (talk) 23:00, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
{{tps}} is a template that lets people know how I saw this message (I have TNT's page on my watchlist). If you click the link, it's a funny essay. In terms of the harassment, I do see that you were called some not very nice names by another editor, but the last time I see any direct interaction between the two of you in October 2017. That's almost 5 months ago. Unless there is something going on off-wiki or they are using IPs, I don't think most admins would block. If there is something going on that is private, you should email There'sNoTime.
In terms of talk page deletion, as both There'sNoTime and I told you, we don't usually delete user talk pages, and there doesn't seem to be a strong reason to delete it (see WP:DELTALK). The thing that is most likely to address your concerns at this point and be within policy is for you to blank your talk page, and then to request a rename (which you can do by submitting a request at Special:GlobalRenameRequest.)
If there is anything private that involves off-wiki details (or is sensitive on-wiki), TNT is a good user to email about it, but from what appears available on-wiki, there really isn't much that can be done, other than the rename request I mentioned above, and blanking your talk page. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
DBZFan30: forgot to ping you. TonyBallioni (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
@DBZFan30: Sorry for not getting back to you sooner - a very helpful and experienced editor who keeps an eye on my talk page, TonyBallioni, has said basically what I would say. Perhaps you could email me a quick summary about the user at the All Star article, and what they've been doing which has upset you? Let me know when you've emailed me, and I'll respond as soon as possible to let you know I've got the email - TNT 16:08, 25 February 2018 (UTC)
Neither of you are helping me. Can you just delete my talk page and change my username? Blanking my talk page won't do anything. Also, you can just delete the All Star article and recreate it without the edits that caused the edit war between me and that other user. No one will notice it was deleted and then recreated. DBZFan30 (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
@DBZFan30: You can request a change of username here - TNT 14:58, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: February 2018





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #302

11:29, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:HI

it's Wilburn from IRC. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tämä on uusi tili (talkcontribs) 20:38, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello - TNT 20:40, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

WP:VPT

There's a thread at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)#Strange page markings that's about the edit summaries in your contribution history. Nthep (talk) 15:31, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Responded at thread :-) ..n̸̥̺̼̻̮̩̈́̇͗͘o̧͖̹͕̲͉̪̖͓̐͊͑͆̎̊̓̐͘͜͝ n̬̭̮͕̝͗̿̍̈́̋̾̉͟e̷̛͓̠̖̳͓̬͐̌͌̎̚̚͝ͅͅȅ̸̡̧͓̟͎̩̞̟̦̔͌͗̎́̑̕̚̚d̷̥̫͇̞̘̮͉̜͊͑́́̽̑̅ ţ̴͔͕̼͔̟͓̋̾͛̍̇͐̒̚͡ö̷̯͉͉̈̍̓̋̐̉͒͟ͅ b͙̗̟̰̳̲͍̱͇̾̄͌̂̂͞e̥̻̜̠͖̞̻̹̼̾̋̋̃͊͞ ȁ̵͕̩̪͔̻̼̯̳̒̋̂̓͜l̫̠̘̪̖̫̼̓̾͗͗̄̓̃̚a̘̣̰̤̭͊̾͐̃̃́̂̓̚ŗ̵̡̰̬̪́̀̎͒̐͠m̴̩̪̦̼̙̣̒̾̏̌͝ͅe̩̲̣̙̠̘͈̼̽̀̇̓͑͞d̫̭̺̭̜̀̄͐̑̅͛̚.. - TNT 16:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Lexi Temkin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #303

OK you've convinced me....

...after about a year of essentially taking a total break from Wikipedia I thought I might start poking my head back in again... I could be wrong but it seems a nicer place to be again generally speaking! Right, now to pick up where I left off in trying to get St Pancras railway station to GA... ah, Ritchie333 has now beaten me to it! Will have to find another one..... OcarinaOfTime (talk) 12:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

@OcarinaOfTime: There's plenty more on User:Ritchie333/London termini. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:21, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Indeed there are Ritchie333! Might have to start with the other station I used to commute into when I worked in London.... though my word it needs a lot of work! Best get to it... OcarinaOfTime (talk) 12:28, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
OcarinaOfTime Did you ever see the little sandwich bar next to it? I had my first ever veal escalope sandwich there  :) how suave I thought that was! :D —SerialNumber54129...speculates 13:12, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Veal escalope sounds like a half-breed baby cow/antelope... with a thick Spanish accent... GMGtalk 13:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Yeah...in Saginaw :p —SerialNumber54129...speculates 14:30, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Anyone for Lobster Thermidor aux crevettes with a Mornay sauce, garnished with truffle pâté, brandy and a fried egg on top and Spam? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:27, 11 March 2018 (UTC)
Wot they said ^ (though seriously, welcome back) - TNT 15:44, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

regarding Simona Fusco

Dear Admin TNT, I respectfully wonder if you can consider in light of Wikipedia guidelines deemed exclusively promotional”, like this, if you would entertain a “fundamental rewrite” to conform with as provided below? Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION.

I understand that this article originally read much more promotional than I intended but it is in the tone that Wikipedia biographical article pages, currently reference and would presumably link to this article(if published, are using. The articles citations reference reputable sources, including the Los Angeles Times.

While appreciate the requisite adherence to neutrality and objectivity, it is perhaps more challengeing to adopt an enclyclopedic style when the tone of the third party and reputable source convey a promotional tone. But it is more constructive for me as an editor ot be conferred an opportunity to make such edits as below and I was wondering if you could provide feedback or consider the following modifications. While I understand immediate deletion for article submissions with questionable notability, I don’t understand why this was not tagged such that I could edit the contribution as provided below. salvaged, I think I offer constructive edits below that are appropriate for a new article on a notable subject.

Article paste

Simona Fusco is a European-born model, actress and owns and manages a matchmaking firm in Los Angeles, California.

Ms. Fusco was born and spent most of her youth in Europe before relocating to the United States at age 14. As a model she has been featured in campaigns for Benetton and other fashion labels. Born in Milan, she relocated to the US at age 21, where she was discovered by entertainment executive Jay Bernstein.

Ms. Fusco is the sole proprietor of Perfect 12 Introductions, a companion search firm for public figures and notable individuals of higher net wealth. She has been a featured panelist on CNN, ABC, FOX and on local affiliate tv stations in Los Angeles on topics relevant to dating. In addition, she has been interviewed for print and digital publications, including the Robb Report, GQ, Esquire, Maxim, LA Confidential, Obscurae Magazine, and Beverly Hills Magazine.

Charity

Ms. Fusco founded the Maria Gruber Foundation, which provides emotional support and consolation to families affected by the terminal illness. She currently serves as the Chairman of the Board of the Maria Gruber Foundation.

Personal Life

Ms. Fusco was married to the late entertainment executive Jay Bernstein and they share one daughter, Amber.

References

Jump up ^ http://www.naludamagazine.com/simona-fusco/ Jump up ^ http://SimonaFusco.com Jump up ^ http://digital.modernluxury.com/publication/?i=478283&ver=html5&p=123# Jump up ^ https://www.elitedaily.com/dating/prepare-first-run-in-ex-matchmaker/1852980 Jump up ^ http://variety.com/2007/scene/markets-festivals/simona-fusco-stratten-1117965730/ Jump up ^ https://www.skynmagazine.com/simona-fusco/ Jump up ^ http://www.latimes.com/local/la-hm-hotprop11-2008oct11-story.html Jump up ^ http://simonafusco.com Jump up ^ https://www.maxim.com/maxim-man/what-a-beautiful-girl-wants-simona-fusco-2016-1 Jump up ^ https://www.maxim.com/maxim-man/what-a-beautiful-girl-wants-simona-fusco-2016-1 Jump up ^ http://www.obscuraemagazine.com/2016/03/simona-fusco/ Jump up ^ http://SimonaFusco.com Jump up ^ https://thehollywoodtimes.net/2015/08/03/simona-fusco-presents-awards-at-the-special-olympics/ Jump up ^ https://mariagruber.org/board-of-director/

Monologuebaby (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

JJ at CLA Development

Hi! I recognize that I have a close affiliation as the page I am editing is my employer, but I feel that I am using neutral language. I am very mindful as to not use this page for promotional purposes but instead, wish to legitimize our organization online. An issue I am running into is that much of the history of the organization is found only in newspapers/articles dated from the 1800's and early 1900's, when much of the organization's transformational history took place. I'm unsure as to how to cite them when many, as they are of now local interest (though not at the time of publication) are unavailable in digital forms. I am also attempting to correct the information that is already on the page and then begin the more in-depth process of finding these archival-level items. I am also looking at other comparable institutions like the institution I represent who source much of their material from their own website as well. I am very aware of the "other stuff exists" guideline but I am currently trying to figure out how to balance the fact that many libraries and archives keep most of their records for themselves and seldom share these records with major publications.

Thank so much! JJ at CLA Development (talk) 14:41, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

@JJ at CLA Development: Hey, welcome to Wikipedia - I'm really glad to hear you've been reading up on how you can contribute neutrally It can be pretty tough doing so when you have a conflict of interest. It may be worth going through some of the training provided here, which may go some way towards explaining how to reference material. We don't require digital versions of citations to be available (in fact, many articles reference offline media) - this section of WP:REF explains how to reference an offline newspaper. If you have any more questions, feel free to leave me a message, or pop by "The Teahouse" - TNT 19:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

Email

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
RadiX 01:35, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #304

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 23:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

TheSandDoctor Talk 23:41, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Replied --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism continues - need permanent block of 74.95.2.145

I noticed you did an earlier block. User_talk:74.95.2.145 That IP address goes to a school site, so it may be a prankster. [[257]] TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:50, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

@Timtempleton: sorry for the delay in getting back to you - it seems this IP has been quiet now for a couple of days. Thanks for the report though! - TNT 17:05, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
No problem - just seemed dodgy. I'll keep an eye out myself. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 20:22, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

Adding new editors to ongoing sockpuppet investigations

Recently I initiated a sockpuppet investigation at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marcelo Boltelho that resulted in several editors being blocked. Today I saw a new editor, Mercado brasileiro Bolt (talk), creating similar articles to the sockfarm while I was reviewing new pages. Given their name and edit history (which includes removing [258] my speedy deletion tags from an article created by the sockfarm) I am fairly certain they are yet another sock. I have added their name to the SPI and messaged them, but I want to ask; are there any other steps I need to take?--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:28, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey SamHolt6 - if you've added them to the SPI, that's all you need to do a SPI clerk or checkuser will take a look shortly - TNT 19:47, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
Ok thanks, this is the first time i've run into new accounts being created that I then have to add to the ongoing SPA.--SamHolt6 (talk) 19:49, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 16:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

TheSandDoctor Talk 16:21, 24 March 2018 (UTC)

12:25, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #305

cute cats!

Wikipedia:CheckUser#Contacting_a_CheckUser sent me to your doorstep. 24.7.14.87 is a strongly contentious user-what must be done to run a CheckUser? Thanks and good night from freezing Japan!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:46, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey @Kintetsubuffalo: - we won't publicly link anyone to an IP address, nor do I believe this meets the grounds for checking but I can take a look and see if there's anything to be done. It may be helpful for you to outline why you believe the IP requires checking, as I may be missing something - TNT 15:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's April 2018 worldwide online editathons.


Focus on: April+Further with Art+Feminism Archaeology Military history (contest) Geofocus: Indian subcontinent

Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list or Women in Red/international list. To unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list. Follow us on Twitter: @wikiwomeninred --Rosiestep (talk) 12:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello TheresNoTime/old, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

  • ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

  • Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

  • While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

  • The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2018).

Administrator changes

added 331dotCordless LarryClueBot NG
removed Gogo DodoPb30SebastiankesselSeicerSoLando

Guideline and policy news

  • Administrators who have been desysopped due to inactivity are now required to have performed at least one (logged) administrative action in the past 5 years in order to qualify for a resysop without going through a new RfA.
  • Editors who have been found to have engaged in sockpuppetry on at least two occasions after an initial indefinite block, for whatever reason, are now automatically considered banned by the community without the need to start a ban discussion.
  • The notability guideline for organizations and companies has been substantially rewritten following the closure of this request for comment. Among the changes, the guideline more clearly defines the sourcing requirements needed for organizations and companies to be considered notable.
  • The six-month autoconfirmed article creation trial (ACTRIAL) ended on 14 March 2018. The post-trial research report has been published. A request for comment is now underway to determine whether the restrictions from ACTRIAL should be implemented permanently.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee is considering a change to the discretionary sanctions procedures which would require an editor to appeal a sanction to the community at WP:AE or WP:AN prior to appealing directly to the Arbitration Committee at WP:ARCA.

Miscellaneous

  • A discussion has closed which concluded that administrators are not required to enable email, though many editors suggested doing so as a matter of best practice.
  • The Foundations' Anti-Harassment Tools team has released the Interaction Timeline. This shows a chronologic history for two users on pages where they have both made edits, which may be helpful in identifying sockpuppetry and investigating editing disputes.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #306

Your draft article, Draft:Lexi Temkin

Hello, There'sNoTime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lexi Temkin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dagmar Stenbeck

Hello, There'sNoTime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dagmar Stenbeck".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  » Shadowowl | talk 10:21, 6 April 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #307

Wikidata weekly summary #308

This Month in GLAM: March 2018





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

18:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Robotarium Project, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

15:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #309

18:17, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

Special:AbuseFilter/825

I pinged you somewhere else about a different filter, but wanted to ask you about Special:AbuseFilter/825. You're the only author, and I see the filter hasn't been edited and in nearly a year and is in log-only. Are you still monitoring the logs, or do you know of someone who is? I'm trying to disable old, forgotten filters. Hope all well! MusikAnimal talk 21:15, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Also Special:AbuseFilter/862 and Special:AbuseFilter/866 MusikAnimal talk 21:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
@MusikAnimal: Wotcha - I'm not actively keeping an eye on any of these, nor do I think anyone else is. Probably best to disable them if needs be - TNT 21:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Okay I've disabled them. Thanks! MusikAnimal talk 21:27, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

May 2018 at Women in Red

Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons.
File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg



New: "Women of the Sea"

New: "Villains"

New: "Women in Sports"

New: "Central Eastern European women"


Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2018 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Wiki Loves Food

Curd Rice
Curd Rice

Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 02:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #310

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2018

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2018).

Administrator changes

added None
removed ChochopkCoffeeGryffindorJimpKnowledge SeekerLankiveilPeridonRjd0060

Guideline and policy news

  • The ability to create articles directly in mainspace is now indefinitely restricted to autoconfirmed users.
  • A proposal is being discussed which would create a new "event coordinator" right that would allow users to temporarily add the "confirmed" flag to new user accounts and to create many new user accounts without being hindered by a rate limit.

Technical news

  • AbuseFilter has received numerous improvements, including an OOUI overhaul, syntax highlighting, ability to search existing filters, and a few new functions. In particular, the search feature can be used to ensure there aren't existing filters for what you need, and the new equals_to_any function can be used when checking multiple namespaces. One major upcoming change is the ability to see which filters are the slowest. This information is currently only available to those with access to Logstash.
  • When blocking anonymous users, a cookie will be applied that reloads the block if the user changes their IP. This means in most cases, you may no longer need to do /64 range blocks on residential IPv6 addresses in order to effectively block the end user. It will also help combat abuse from IP hoppers in general. This currently only occurs when hard-blocking accounts.
  • The block notice shown on mobile will soon be more informative and point users to a help page on how to request an unblock, just as it currently does on desktop.
  • There will soon be a calendar widget at Special:Block, making it easier to set expiries for a specific date and time.

Arbitration

Obituaries

  • Lankiveil (Craig Franklin) passed away in mid-April. Lankiveil joined Wikipedia on 12 August 2004 and became an administrator on 31 August 2008. During his time with the Wikimedia community, Lankiveil served as an oversighter for the English Wikipedia and as president of Wikimedia Australia.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:05, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

CYE

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
--jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:12, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Glad you are doing better

Hi there TNT, I am glad to see that you are (hopefully) doing better . Could you please check your email when you get the chance? Thanks --TheSandDoctor Talk 18:06, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #311

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

mail call

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:24, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: April 2018





Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #312

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

nastiness

Hello, TheresNoTime/old. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Your draft article, Draft:Robotarium Project

Hello, There'sNoTime. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robotarium Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 17 May 2018 (UTC)

G13 Eligibility Notice

The following pages will become eligible for CSD:G13 shortly.

Thanks, HasteurBot (talk) 03:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)