User talk:Tashi/Archive/2017

Text me please

Hey would like to talk to you about something pertaining to a page. My # is 310-436-5078 ASAP — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eshybaby19 (talk • contribs) 13:17, 7 May 2017 (UTC) Eshybaby19 (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

@Eshybaby19, what do you want to talk about? Tashi _{Talk to me} 19:48, 7 May 2017 (UTC)

AAVE

Do you really need it to be spelled out why the comment is vandalism / hateful speech? The editor unproductively and with flagrant bias:

• Offensively accuses other editors of white guilt, social justice warriorism, and "far-leftist" extremism
• Offensively attacks linguistics and sociology as entire disciplines
• Offensively equates the terms gangsta rap and "antisocial fad"
• Offensively labels an entire group's natural way of speaking "nonsense"
• Offensively (and bizarrely) refers to the dozens of credible and respected authors cited on the page as "some random leftist academic", as if it's all somehow just one source
• Offensively denigrates AAVE speakers as "simpletons"
• Contradicts established rules of the scientific study known as linguistics
• Does all this without a single WP:RELIABLE source for support

This is speech absolutely intended to anger and inflame others: WP:PERSONAL ATTACKS and WP:TROLLing. The entire comment itself is a rant that actually expects no real respectful or open-minded dialogue, already preparing for a backlash of even-keeled critics due to its awareness of itself as a deliberately hostile tirade. And now we're spending time bickering about it. I'm explaining this for your sake because it needs to be made absolutely crystal clear that it's hateful. Otherwise, I'd simply have ignored the issue and recommended that we not feed the trolls. Wolfdog (talk) 19:53, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

I would like to confirm my support of this deletion (as the only other person to attempt to restore the thread). Whether or not the anon user was being deliberately inflammatory, there is no real opportunity for editors to correct their misguided views and the thread standing without any semblance of validity might untowardly invite the wrong kind of talk page discussion. — Ƶ§œš¹ _{[lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt]} 20:27, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tashi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)