User talk:Sudhavedanta
Welcome to the Talk Page of Sudhavedanta[edit]
Hello! Welcome to my talk page. I am a scholar of the humanities and social sciences, focusing on Religious Studies, Indian Studies, Philosophy, Sociology of Religion, Advaita Vedanta, and Ramakrishna-Vivekananda studies. I want to contribute to Wikipedia in these fields. Thank you for visiting this page. Sudhavedanta (talk) 11:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia, Sudhavedanta! Thank you for your contributions. I am CoconutPaste and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Regards, CoconutPaste (talk) 03:41, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Sudhavedanta. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
I would like to communicate with you about the problem with Jeff Kripal's name being inserted into so many paragraphs of the Ramakrishna Page[edit]
I think it's wrong for Kripal's limited and personal view of Ramakrishna be inserted throughout the article on Ramakrishna. It's a minority view and no other historic or religious figure has such controversal criticism attached to their story. I think the whole article needs to be re-done with most of Kripal's references deleted or demoted to a footnote. His view is not the story of Ramakrishna, and is not even a very well supported view, in the world's conception of Ramakrishna. I am alerting editors who have worked on the Ramakrishna article, to better position Kripal's comments in this article. The article needs a major re-write.
What are your thoughts? Ellis408 (talk) 19:32, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Ellis408, I completely agree with you. I have been wanting to get a rewrite but have been unsuccessful. It has to be done and I will do whatever best I can. Sudhavedanta (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- Kripal is relevant, because his interpretations caused such a stir. WP:CENSOR will not be accepted. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 05:32, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- There are Kripal defenders who will fight any changes, but an honest overview of the Ramakrishna article will show that his opinions are not a major or accepted view of Ramakrishna, and are needlessly scattered throughout the article - really just a promotional push for Kripal and his books. The ONLY reason he gets so much attention is that his views are salacious and sex-oriented. I am hoping other editors will tackle this as a group effort. It's not censoring Kripal, but putting his comments in the appropriate place. Ellis408 (talk) 17:58, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
- See WP:CANVAS. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 18:05, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |