User talk:Sps999

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 18:38, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Gurjar. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tamravidhir (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tamravidhir:Sorry I didn't know about that. And I have given my views on the issue,you can check it out if you want to.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Gurjar, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 17:03, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have to get consensus. You have been discussing on the article talk page, which is fine, but you can't just wipe out stuff when you do not get your own way there. - Sitush (talk) 17:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What vendalism ? If you have any problem with edit you can claim you information on talk page.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sps999, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
What vendalism ? - deleting templates, infobox + sourced information - Arjayay (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

3RR warning[edit]

Your recent contributions at Gurjar appear to show that you are engaged in edit warring; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not override another editor's contributions. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. - Arjayay (talk) 17:45, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arjayay:No need to message again and again

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Arjayay (talk) 18:16, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Gurjar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 18:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@bradv: I was not aware of this rule and also in some of the edits I re-edited my own edit. Please unblock my account, there was no disputes as such, few people were arguing about it but thats how information is validated on wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sps999 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not aware of the rule

Decline reason:

Ignorantia juris non excusat Yunshui ^雲 _水 15:02, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Now that you are aware of the rule, how will you handle it when one of your edits is reverted? 331dot (talk) 09:37, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019[edit]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 02:28, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Suraj Mal, you may be blocked from editing. Alivardi (talk) 15:56, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]