User talk:Splink
I've only just noticed the {{editorial}} tag you've put on the article. Could you explain how it seems to read like an opinion piece? It seems fine to me.--Launchballer 07:27, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
- There has been a recent change to the article since I tagged it that completely changes the tone of the paragraph I originally had issue with, and I don't think the need for the tag is now as strong as it was. I was originally concerned with some of the words used that suggested a personal opinion towards the companies mentioned and the specific policies brought up in the article itself, but I'm happy that the whole tone of the article has improved. I have removed the tag and also changed the use of the word "rumbled" to "exposed" within the article itself. Splink (talk) 12:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |