User talk:Sp176

January 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Lord Laitinen. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Andy Harris (politician), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Though you did cite a source, this content is controversial and highly biased, possibly even on a defamatory level. I suggest you review Wikipedia policy before making such edits again. Lord Laitinen (talk) (requests) 01:22, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sp176: I once again removed the content you added to the page. Though you cited more reliable sources than last time, I still find your wording to be incredibly more biased than is allowed, as well as the fact that you focused on a narrow amount of information from the sources you cited. At this point, I would recommend you allow other users to re-add this information in time, or allow Internet users to find the information themselves elsewhere. Thank you. Lord Laitinen (talk) (requests) 21:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Lord Laitinen:

Please tell me exactly which sentences were worded in a biased manner. while the section may be updated with further information about other aspects of the town hall. his remarks afterword are certainly the most notable and controversial, thus why it is in the section on controversies. I have looked over your user contributions page and it appears as though you have a clear conservative bias, as well as having made classist remarks in the comments on your edits. I will not allow you to censor information about politicians, no matter how controversial. again, tell me exactly which sentences are not worded in a neutral manner. Sp176 (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're being contentious. When an editor who's been around a while tells you (who hasn't) that you're not following the rules and directs you to those rules, you should assume he's probably right and read the rules. You shouldn't accuse him of politically-motivated censorship and demand that he do lots of careful work to prove that he isn't. Dingsuntil (talk) 00:01, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

you reviewed what I wrote and made minor edits. He deleted it entirely. It is clear he did not want this information on wikipedia, for whatever reason. I clearly feel that it is important that the facts surrounding this event are included on Harris' page. My section has now been edited and accepted, he did not need to remove the entire sub section immediately. I maintain he must have been biased in doing so with such speed and without reserve.

What he wants is not clear at all. He didn't delete my edits, which include all the bad shit you wanted to say which was supported by RS. There is a lesson here. Dingsuntil (talk) 01:00, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I mean he did delete the entire subsection before I reinstated the changes, which was before you edited it and it was accepted by another reviewer. All the bad shit? Which was one sentence commenting on the racial nature of his remarks? While that may be uncorroborated by sources, (though not by common sense) it was hardly defamatory or libelous. You've cursed every single time you have communicated with me, what's your issue?

I have internet tourette's syndrome. Don't make fun of me. Dingsuntil (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your support, Dingsuntil. I feel that you replied exactly the way I would have, had I seen this first. Sp176, I suggest you refrain from questioning my judgment and forget all about Andy Harris. If you're this passionate about editing on Wikipedia, getting yourself blocked is probably not your end-goal. Thank you. Lord Laitinen (talk) (requests) 01:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for questioning the great and reputed judgement LL, or should I say milord. Lol. You have not addressed my concerns, and while I am a new user, that does not invalidate my claims. I will continue to monitor pages that I am interested in, and edit them to reflect ongoing events. I will not be bullied into submission by you and your personal bias. While your contributions are targeted at improving wikipedia as a whole, I have noticed you have a tendency towards defending conservative points of view and politicians on wikipedia, in addition to making disgustingly pretentious, classist, and offensive comments.

You forgot to curtsy @Lord Laitinen:. Seriously, stop insulting (his grace, the) LL. It serves no purpose other than to provide evidence to justify banning you. Instead, go on editing. Just be more subtle. There's probably tons of verifiable, notable events which make conservative politicians look bad which are not adequately covered by Wikipedia, and which you could draw attention to in a neutral, just-the-facts way. Dingsuntil (talk) 02:56, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your constructive criticism Dingsuntil. LL is still a creepy old man tho.

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:17, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Sp176. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. I don't appreciate being called names. I am just trying to save Wikipedia from bias and defamation. Lord Laitinen (talk) (requests) 17:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]