User talk:Sloclops

Wow! Thanks

for adding so many details into the 2012 WPSL Elite League season article! I didn't think anyone else would care so much about getting the details of this league prepared. The map is a great touch, too. ^.^ Though, next time you want to completely reorganize an article, could you suggest it in the talk section instead of just going with it? ;-) Anyway, thanks again for helping out so much - it's great to not have to carry the whole thing myself! CyMoahk (talk) 00:15, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Will do about the talk page. You're right and I should have consulted those of you who originally created the article. It was a brash decision on my part. If you'd like I can change it back. I was trying to model this article after the 2012 MLS season, so I wasn't arbitrarily moving the sections around. Sloclops (talk)

Yeah, I recognize the format; you don't have to change it back, it just really threw me off, I was more upset at the suddenness of the change as opposed to the change itself. No worries! CyMoahk (talk) 01:05, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that I hate stepping on people's toes. Sloclops (talk) 01:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Boston Breakers

May I inquire as to why the WPS page was moved to WPSL? While I understand that the franchise has changed leagues, it's already been established that the team had a different page for its WUSA participation here. This is also shown with Atlanta Beat (WUSA) and Atlanta Beat (WPS) and loosely with Washington Freedom when they became magicJack. Let's make sure it's consistent one way or another. Suggestions? GauchoDude (talk) 16:10, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

It was my thinking that since it's a natural continuity of the team that just switched leagues, similar to minor league hockey and baseball, instead of ceasing to play for a significant amount of years, but the franchise name, colors, etc. still exist, the name is a reflection of their second continuing existence. The name change itself is to help with the disambiguation. When it comes down to it, it's really whether these teams should be divided or grouped together. The reasons that the WUSA teams were split off from their WPS teams, I don't think apply just because it is the same team that was in WPS and not the WUSA (similar to the Western New York Flash who is in their 4th year and 3rd league and same team throughout).

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Northern Premier League Challenge Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandy Lane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of 2013–14 Manchester Premier Cup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 Manchester Premier Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Manchester Premier Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 23:02, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your confirmation here. The user who made the change initially Pikachu09081998 has a history of garbage edits and I had little choice but to revert a lot of stuff they submitted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Game log talk (basketball)

Template:Game log talk (basketball) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:49, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sloclops. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sloclops. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sloclops. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)