User talk:Sinomina2000

Welcome![edit]

Hi Sinomina2000! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Wikipedia's policy on biographies[edit]

Wikipedia has a very strong policy on biographies of living people. It is not permissible to make unsubstantiated allegations that imply criminality. There is no obvious basis to suspect malfeasance but you are not permitted even to allege it or insinuate it before a court has ruled.
Wikipedia encourages editors to WP:BEBOLD and to go ahead and make edits. The other side of that coin is the Bold, Revert, Discuss policy: you may make a controversial edit but if another editor reverts it and invites discussion, you must engage in that discussion and not try bludgeon through your version. To do so is considered edit warring and may lead to suspension of your editing privileges.

So now please go to talk:Ursula von der Leyen#Pfizer-Scandal and explain why your edit should be accepted, referring the policy on biographies.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petra Terhoeven (April 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petra Terhoeven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sinomina2000! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 21:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]