User talk:Scoutstheman

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Wozniak[edit]

Hello Scoutstheman,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Scott Wozniak for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 17:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit to List of YouTubers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Playgendary, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scoutstheman! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at The Good Life (Weezer song) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia — it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a second request for you to stop inappropriate marking edits as minor as you did at Ghostbusters (song). Read the notice immediately above again. Please take this seriously. The next time will be a warning instead of a request. After that you could be blocked from editing. It is deceptive to mark edits as minor when they are not minor. Please stop. Sundayclose (talk) 18:21, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rooster Teeth, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits - Final warning[edit]

This is your final warning to stop inappropriately marking edits as minor, as you did at Ghostbusters (song). If you do so again you could be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 15:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ScrewAttack (April 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at ScrewAttack instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article has merely been soft deleted. If you believe it should be restored then you can bring it back at its current location with the new information added, approving this draft would be splitting the edit history in an unnecessary way. However, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ScrewAttack (2nd nomination) for why it was merged in the first place.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ScrewAttack and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ScrewAttack, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 03:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:ScrewAttack[edit]

Hello, Scoutstheman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:ScrewAttack, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your restoration on the Rooster Teeth article[edit]

The video you're referencing is a primary source and is not sufficient to add this material. Furthermore, you failed to address the WP:Undue and WP:Coatrack issues. 46.97.170.34 (talk) 10:27, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]