Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ibrahim Rugova seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije(talk) 21:17, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Please, stop making disruptive edits. Instead, discuss the issues at talk pages and seek WP:consensus with other editors. Vanjagenije(talk) 21:18, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. signed, Rosguilltalk 17:44, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nathan2055talk - contribs 17:23, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since File:Flag of Europe.svg is located on Wikimedia Commons instead of locally, I have copied your redirect at File:Flag of EU.svg over there and requested deletion of the local version. This is purely for technical reasons, and your new redirect will still function properly on this site once the local version is deleted. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know here or on my user talk page. Thanks for your contributions! Nathan2055talk - contribs 17:26, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:53, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Since File:SocialistYugoslavia en.svg is located on Wikimedia Commons instead of locally, I have copied your redirect at File:AVNOJ borders.svg over there and requested deletion of the local version. This is purely for technical reasons, and your new redirect will still function properly on this site once the local version is deleted. If you have any questions or concerns, please let me know here or on my user talk page. Thanks for your contributions! Nathan2055talk - contribs 20:56, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Savasampion! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. —J. M. (talk) 22:14, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Albanians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahmet Q. (talk) 16:44, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
File copyright problem with File:Kosovo Flag Proposal.svg[edit]
Thank you for uploading File:Kosovo Flag Proposal.svg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
Given your recent disruptive editing (intentional or unintentional), I will remind you WP:COMPETENCE is required to succeed on this project. As I see you've been editing for more than 3 years, it is unacceptable that you still don't seem to grasp even the most basic tenets of wiki policy and rules, such as WP:PRIMARY and WP:COMMONNAME, and seem confused as to what they even mean. Instead of avowals that you will try to learn the ropes, all I've gotten from you is WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and edit-warring.
I will remind you that the Arbitration Committee has authorized administrators to block or ban users who exhibit a pattern of disruptive editing in the Balkan topic area. I won't hesitate to report you if you continue adding outright hoaxes such as the "Yugoslav Revolution" to templates, [1] "Kosovo didn't declare independence from Serbia", [2] and so on. I've been more than patient with you for over a year. This has to stop. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 15:48, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to be kind enough to talk to you. A lot has changed in recent years, a human learns while he is alive. I admit that I made mistakes, but it is absurd to say that Rugova died in Serbia and Montenegro (today Kosovo), when it was a part as much as it is a part of Serbia today (in fact, it does not manage that territory). A year ago, I did not remember to say that it is under international administration, so you thought that the place of death was the country. Also, I was wrong to say that Kosovo is the author of the declaration of independence, as the identity of the author is still in dispute. Some claim (most ICJ judges) that they did not represent the government in that territory, but that they declared independence out of the institutions, which should mean that everyone can individually and non-institutionally declare whatever they want. The title Yugoslav Revolution is in line with WP:COMMONNAME. The headline itself says that it refers to Slobodan Milosevic's Overthrow and that you have the right to go to other articles about the revolution in that country. We can agree on Presevo War, I offer you: - Yes, as you say, the Končulj Agreement should be in quotation marks -or to indicate that it is a document with the original title of the Statement on Demilitarization of May 2001. -or to change to the Statement on Demilitarization. I hope I was clear. Thanks.--Savasampion (talk) 16:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into American Serbs. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Vanjagenije(talk) 23:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have seriously heard her called that and I do not see anything controversial. For example, Haji Mustafa Pasha was called the Serbian Mother ...--Savasampion (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Немој смарати и стављати своју ретардирану верзију грба Кнежевине Србије који си склопио користећи грб из 2004. године. ПОстоји оригинални грб који сам ја радио који упорно мењаш. Немој то да радиш, досадан си и твоја верзија је далеко инфериорнија. --WikiNameBaks (talk) 22:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Буди мало културнији. Нема оригинала, нема стандарда у 19 веку. Сви користе своју верзију, а ја сам направио пресек користећи фотографије цртежа, печата, застава, докумената... Онај грб на штиту није из 2004, него је фрагмент цртежа Ернста Крала из 1882. године. Препоручујем ти да радиш грбове у СВГ формату. Мања је величина датотеке, али је квалитетан. --Savasampion (talk) 11:51, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Principality of Serbia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.Vanjagenije(talk) 22:58, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Excuse me, what is the time frame for the change?--Savasampion (talk) 19:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Disambiguation link notification for June 29[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Macedonian Muslims, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Goranci. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your edit at Republika Srpska (1992-1995) has been reverted, due to this unexplained edit (possibly vandalism) being disruptive and unsourced. Suasufzeb (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed that a number of your edits were marked as minor. Note however that this deviates from Help:Minor edit. Please apply more rigor when using the minor edit checkbox in the future. Similarly, please use the Help:Edit summary to explain edits, too. TIA. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 07:54, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguation link notification for November 20[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Čačak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Serbian.
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy deletion nomination of Native Serbs in Greece[edit]
Hello, Savasampion,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Jingiby, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Native Serbs in Greece, for deletion, because it is a very short article that doesn't provide readers with enough context to determine who or what the subject is.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.
For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Jingiby}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Omčo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2A01:4C8:64:7ECA:BC87:9C14:EE34:2337 (talk) 17:40, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ahmet Q. (talk) 02:53, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Palanka a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. * Pppery *it has begun... 03:39, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Palanka. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
Disambiguation link notification for January 19[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Independent State of Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Croatian.
In this edit, you named five persons and labeled them "drug users". You cited a source that neither mentions their names, neither calls them drug users. Such behavior of yours is very problematic. This is not the first time you are inserting inflammatory claims into articles and citing sources that actually do not verify your claims. Here, I asked you about another such edit, but you failed to respond. Take this as the last warning. If you continue to make such edits, you may be blocked without further warning. Vanjagenije(talk) 15:49, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Stop. Further edit-warring such as that on Independent State of Croatia will result in escalating blocks. You have already been warned about possible sanctions regarding disruptive editing on such articles. That also goes for unjustified tagging with no proper justification on the talk page. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 14:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What's not clear? A self-proclaimed creation that was not recognized by the allied countries. Savasampion (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, there are two distinct articles here: Slavic speakers in Ottoman Macedonia and Slavic speakers of Greek Macedonia, hence their inhabitants are different too. Jingiby (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think that Vasil Chekalarov (1874-1913), Gotse Delchev (1872-1903),... have nothing to do with Greece. Anton Yugov was born in Ottoman times too.
Under the 1920 Treaty of Sèvres, Greece opened schools for minority-language children, and in September 1924 Greece agreed to a protocol with Bulgaria to place its Slavic-speaking minority under the protection of the League of Nations as Bulgarians. However, the Greek parliament refused to ratify the protocol due to objections from Serbia, considering the Slavic speakers to be Serbs rather than Bulgarians, and from Greeks who considered the Slavic speakers to be Slavicized Greeks rather than ethnic Slavs. As far as I understand, we are talking about an ethnolinguistic group that lives in the territory of Greek/Aegean Macedonia and speaks a "Slavic language". For these reasons, I think that the template Serbs should be placed. Savasampion (talk) 22:03, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije(talk) 22:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Although I warned you, you continue to add unsourced controversial info ([3]). That has to stop. Vanjagenije(talk) 22:14, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Literally, the article says the source? The third last line in the first paragraph. Savasampion (talk) 01:08, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On top of the fact that this is a primary source with all that entails, you did not provide the source when you added the information. By inserting the information in the way you did, without providing the source, you made it appear that the information came from either Cheney et al or O’Neill, which are the two citations at the end of that sentence. That is unacceptable editing behaviour, especially on a figure whose origins are so contested. Please read and apply Wikipedia policies when you are editing. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 11:24, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So I should have put this in the description of the picture? Savasampion (talk) 11:27, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:39, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Vanjagenije(talk) 21:58, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
After you introduced this edit, I reverted you and left you a message at Talk:Alexander I of Yugoslavia#Bulgarian girl. What you did is very problematic. You added some controversial info to the article and cited a book, but it turned out that the book does not verify your claim. Instead of answering, you reinstated your edit, now citing a different book (Teodorov, "Balkanskite voini", pp. 259, 261.). I searched Google Books, but couldn't find that book. Since you already misused sources several times, there is high possibility that you just invented this source. Therefore, I had to block you. I am willing to unblock you as soon as you show that such a book exists, that it's a reliable source and that it verifies your claim. Vanjagenije(talk) 22:06, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I hope you will read the message. In The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (pdf copy) I found a reference to that source. There is also a picture of the page it says on. I didn't make anything up and I'm sorry if it wasn't true. I will try not to make any more mistakes and aggressions in the coming period. Thank you for your understanding. Savasampion (talk) 22:10, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Where exactly is the "girl" mentioned in the book? Vanjagenije(talk) 18:49, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
She is not mentioned in that source, but I left the others that mention the girl. I will not go into whether it really happened, but I referred to that source that I found. I didn't make it up, but I combined (stay) all the sources that probably led to the conclusion that it was the same event. The fact that it is not published on Google Books does not mean that the book does not exist at all. Thanks. Savasampion (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
My fault and someone else's. I hope I won't cause any problems in the next period. Savasampion (talk) 22:14, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
This is incoherent to me. 331dot (talk) 09:17, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Vanjagenije blocked me because he claims that I have no source for the above mentioned book being mentioned anywhere.In The Sleepwalkers: How Europe Went to War in 1914 (pdf copy) I found a reference to that source. I didn't make anything up and I'm sorry if it wasn't true. I will try not to make any more mistakes in the coming period.--Savasampion (talk) 18:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Decline reason:
I'm soft closing this on the advice of the blocking admin. 331dot (talk) 18:36, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Ok, so you did not invent the Teodorov book, I guess. It is mentioned as a source in the Clark book. But, have you ever seen it? Have you seen the book you are citing, or are you citing a book without knowing its content? Vanjagenije(talk) 23:54, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. That book exists (type the original title in Cyrillic Балканските войни Теодоров).--Savasampion (talk) 12:42, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read it and why didn't you reply?--Savasampion (talk) 17:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I am waiting for you to answer my question. The question was: Have you seen the book you are citing, or are you citing a book without knowing its content?Vanjagenije(talk) 20:02, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Didn't I say a few days ago? I did, I saw the book I quoted. It is mentioned in the section on the Second Balkan War. Savasampion (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are lying. I think you just saw the citation of the Todorov book inside the Clark book, and then you used it as a reference without knowing its content. This is very problematic, as it shows that you are not aware of the importance of WP:V. To the reviewing admin: I recommend this unblock request be declined. Vanjagenije(talk) 23:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Why would I? In the chapter МЕЖДУСЪЮЗНИЧЕСКАТА ВОЙНА that starts on page 182, in sub-chapter 6 СРЪБСКИ ПРЕДИЗВИКАТЕЛСТВА from 259-264. First I used the Clark book and later I saw in the original book. It was easier for me to write the first title of the book, because I hesitated about the translation of the title of the second. Savasampion (talk) 23:58, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I'm Jingiby. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ibrahim Rugova seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 17:26, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Albanians. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce jokes into articles, as you did at Ana Brnabić , you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is a serious encyclopedia, and contributions of this type are considered vandalism. Amanuensis Balkanicus (talk) 21:22, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Principality of Serbia. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please stop your disruptive editing.
