User talk:RuleBrittania

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RuleBrittania (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I havent done anything, I told you on that admins noticeboard that i wouldnt and havent touched the pages of my reverted edits again!! I'm only here to edit health related topics!!! I've only been blocked because of simply wanting to civilly warn MONGO, PLEASE reconsider I haven't vandalised anything!! please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for the place I was reported! Ive apologised for trying to warn MONGO.. again I'm sorry! Can't another admin review not the blocking one! HONESTLY! I haven't done anything wrong, please! --RuleBrittania 11:28, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's clear we're done here. — 〈RED VEЯS〉 21:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RuleBrittania (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I havent done anything, I told you on that admins noticeboard that i wouldnt and havent touched the pages of my reverted edits again!! I'm only here to edit health related topics!!! I've only been blocked because of simply wanting to civilly warn MONGO, PLEASE reconsider I haven't vandalised anything!! please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents for the place I was reported! Ive apologised for trying to warn MONGO.. again I'm sorry! --RuleBrittania 22:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've been determined to be a sockpuppet of a banned user, so request declined. — Majorly _{(o rly?)} 22:58, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Fair use rationale for Image:MedalertCar.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:MedalertCar.jpg. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea[edit]

Inserting your own POV into articles and then calling people who disagree with you Right Wing will accomplish nothing. Your additions to that article are speculation, which is not encyclopedic. Furthermore, you claim on your own userpage that you hate Wikipedia, so why are you here? TheQuandry 19:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North Korea edits[edit]

If you believe that an article is biased, please contribute to improving it with sourced, verifiable information, not with editorializing. You may or may not be the same as another user, but your edits are very similar, both in content and in style (e.g. adding pro-NK and anti-American editorializing to articles, and extreme comma splices) to User:NoJoyInMudville. --Reuben 21:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotection[edit]

I have no idea when, and am not sure what MONGO will want to do (and incidentally, I'm sure he already knows about AGF). Trebor 18:55, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Provide a diff, or contact the Administrators' noticeboard. -- ReyBrujo 21:08, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account is a sockpuppet of Frogsprog (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Speedy deletion nomination of MedAlert[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on MedAlert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natureium (talk) 18:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]