User talk:Royzee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Heya, I Saw Your Question On Dalek Creation Under The Discusion Section. There Are Several Creation Versions For The Daleks.... The Dalek Chronicles [Terry Nations Version], The Show Version [Davros ect], And The Bryant Anderson Report [What You Remember], The More Commonly Knowen Version Is The Show Version Though, Hope This Helps (Duckman025 (talk) 06:38, 14 May 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Royzee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!  - Patricknoddy 22:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


A tag has been placed on James rouch, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Patricknoddy 22:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Press releases copy and pasted into talk pages[edit]

Hi. Please stop copying and pasting press releases etc. into talk pages. This is a violation of copyright. Further if you believe the information belongs in the article you should paraphrase the source and provide a link, not hope that somebody else will. Thanks. Mark83 09:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Royzee! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Rafael Garres - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Rouch for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Rouch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Rouch (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:26, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]