User talk:Religious Burp

Welcome!

Hello, Religious Burp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 05:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Religious Burp, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like The Penguin Dance, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 05:54, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:55, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using IMDB as a source[edit]

IMDB is not considered a WP:RS reliable source since - like Wikipedia - much of the content can be edited by users. Sometimes IMDB is adequate as a weak source, since some of the information does come from official press releases but better sources are preferred. -- Horkana (talk) 01:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Pizza appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:44, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Santo, Sam and Ed's Cup Fever! for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santo, Sam and Ed's Cup Fever! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santo, Sam and Ed's Cup Fever! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Pee Jay 00:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Departure Songs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Walter's ramblings[edit]

You wrote that a vandal removed content: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Loudest_Sound_Ever_Heard&diff=797784819&oldid=794456956 I am not a vandal. I removed it, with an explanation every time. How is that vandalism? Are you familiar with WP:RS, and WP:PRIMARY? Perhaps you should acquaint yourself with them. Also, WP:AGF. There are others. If you want to discuss how to make constructive contributions, feel free to ask. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:32, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, your reverts are based on nothing but your personal opinion, not constructive reasoning or adding relevant information to articles. I see you have been banned quite a number of times for edit-warring and sock-puppeting. Continue to edit-war and I'll push for you to be banned again, including your IP address. I will not be bullied. So play nice. Religious Burp (talk) 05:56, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you don't get it. You're not being bullied. You're being asked to explain the WP:PRIMARY sources you're adding. Feel free to push back. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have no grounds for claiming I'm antagonistic when you made clear WP:BATTLEGROUND statements above. All I did was make policy- and guideline-based reverts and I'm asking for policy or guideline reasons for including WP:PRIMARY content and you offer opinion, name calling and request topic bans. I'm becoming concerned with your presence. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:52, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can try to bait & bully, but I won't sink to your level. That is why you are reported. Wikipedia is not the place to bully or attempt to assert yourself over others. It is a source of information. That is why you have been blocked so many times by a number of people and regularly edit war. Religious Burp (talk) 22:55, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Prayer Chain[edit]

After you mentioned the band article I put it on my list to check. You made the edit while I was away on vacation, otherwise I would have reviewed them sooner. You removed multiple {{citation needed}} templates and did not provide references. You unnecessarily created short sections with incorrect capitalization (See MOS:HEADING). You essentially took the article back to your earlier state and added some more content. That's a huge problem. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:16, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:The Loudest Sound Ever Heard. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. You have made another over-generalization of my behaviour. I pointed you to WP:NPA here and stated that if you commented on the contributor rather than the content I would start a warning process. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:53, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment that you have not made personal attack is not correct. As I pointed to above, WP:NPA is clear on what constitutes a personal attack, and you have made several, both here and on Talk:The Loudest Sound Ever Heard. Even claiming that I am "removing content about a band because he doesn't like the band itself" is patently false. You don't know which bands I do and don't like, which albums I do and don't have, or which concerts I have or have not attended. Of course, none of this is related to the topic of whether mater is reliably sourced or not. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:13, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your repeated assertions that I am personally attacking you are without basis. Have I ever removed your content? No. Standing up to bullying is not a personal attack. You have bullyed me and constantly tried to assert yourself over me (such as you are doing here), in addition to your misplaced condescension. It only creates a hostile environment and does nothing to enhance Wikipedia. That is why you have been blocked a number of times by a number of people, so this is more than my opinion. I will not engage any further with you because your bullying doesn't deserve the time of day. Religious Burp (talk) 02:59, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of Edit Warring Noticeboard[edit]

Hi there. Not sure if you missed my note to you or something, but as I already explained, the edit warring noticeboard is about edit-warring. It's not the place for people to air out every single grievance you have about another editor. I'm not saying you're right or wrong about your complaints, I'm just saying you're wasting your time writing it there. You're doing the equivalent of going down to the post office to complain about a local politician or something - you're complaining at the wrong venue. Sergecross73 msg me 13:31, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]