User talk:Rdanneskjold

Speedy deletion of John D. Collins (philosopher)

A tag has been placed on John D. Collins (philosopher) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. - Icewedge (talk) 22:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Achille Varzi (philosopher)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Achille Varzi (philosopher), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.columbia.edu/~av72. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:01, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:12, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Czeslaw Lejewski

On 18 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Czeslaw Lejewski, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

-- How do you turn this on (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Philosophy of psychology Anti-psychologism Graham Priest Thomas Tymoczko Logic in Islamic philosophy Johan van Benthem (logician) Port-Royal Logic Hermeneutics Logicism Philosophical logic Josef Korbel Music of Qatar Medieval philosophy Dava Sobel Pineapple Festival Civil society Interval temporal logic Rua Tonelero Gestell

Cleanup Maurice Merleau-Ponty Philosophy of physics Principle of bivalence Merge Ampheck Zionology Apodeictic Add Sources Ordinary language philosophy José Saramago Contemporary philosophy Wikify Edmund Husserl Philosophy of education Posterior Analytics Expand Phenomenology Alonzo Church Verificationism

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Another article for you to look at

Oh, I hope you do edit some of those that the suggest bot mentioned - philosophy articles are badly in need of editing for content, and then, wikification. I was trying to copyedit, wikify, clean-up a number of philosophy articles, particularly [Nathan Salmon] and [Scott Soames]. Neither has any citations from secondary literature showing who uses their views or critiques them. Soames's article is woefully thin. Salmon's article is perhaps a bit technical for the average reader. He linked himself to the article on [Existence] (Salmon did the edit himself) ahead of Soames - the article on Existence is coming along really well, but I'm seeking expert views, since Salmon has complained that my edits are not philosophically-minded enough. Thanks, if you get the chance to comment or edit either of those.Levalley (talk) 03:45, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)