User talk:Ramize84

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Ramize84, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Shandana Minhas, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 05:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shandana Minhas[edit]

The article Shandana Minhas has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. J 947^{^{^{(c) (m)}}} 05:44, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flashtr[edit]

Hello Ramize84,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Flashtr for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Zazzysa (talk) 15:48, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manu Bhattathiri[edit]

The article Manu Bhattathiri has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:13, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Dl2000. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Anees Salim seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Further to edits of Anees Salim[edit]

Before getting to more details about neutrality concerns, there are actually more serious concerns about unjustified removal of references and replacement of content as was done with this edit, where the References list was reduced from 9 to 5 items without valid cause. As for the neutrality concerns, those involve promotional adjectives, particularly wording like "award-winning" and "prestigious" in the lead paragraph, especially when combined with major article rewriting. Dl2000 (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of edits on Anees Salim - 2[edit]

With all due respect, those are absurd grounds. If you paid attention to the sources removed and the ones that were put in, you'd see that the essence of the article hasn't changed, but redundant references which say the same thing have been removed. If your objection was to the references anyway, then you could have just flagged it instead of removing all the edits. Overkill? As far as the use of 'promotional' words like 'prestigious' and 'award-winning' are concerned, those are facts and not promotional phrases. Look up the meanings of those words, and then the awards Anees Salim has won. :) I'm sorry, but it seems as if you've jumped the gun and overreacted to the article. I'd appreciate it if, in the spirit of Wikipedia, you aid creation of content the right way instead of making arbitrary, unjustified calls like these. Ramize84 (talk) 01:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manu Bhattathiri for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manu Bhattathiri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manu Bhattathiri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Meeanaya (talk) 07:41, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hubhopper (October 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Willsome429 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Product Line" and "Investments" sections are completely unsourced. Please add reliable sources to those sections.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hubhopper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hubhopper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ramize84! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hubhopper (April 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hubhopper and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hubhopper, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 09:02, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]