User talk:RIDHVAN SHARMA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi RIDHVAN SHARMA! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm NekoKatsun. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mount Everest have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 15:19, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to 2020 Indian farmers' protest, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Shyamal (talk) 06:36, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon In this edit to the article on Ladakh, you added a photograph to a citation. The photograph does not appear to have been related to the citation. It has been reverted.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Ganbaruby. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. An image you uploaded appears to be copyrighted content borrowed from another website. If you are the copyright holder and would like to use this image on Wikipedia, please follow the instructions given at WP:DONATEIMAGE. This will start the process to get an OTRS ticket in place on the item proving that Wikipedia has permission to use it. The image should be uploaded to Commons, not directly to Wikipedia, so you will need to open a user account on that wiki as well. This may sound complex, but hopefully if you take it step by step it will go smoothly. If you have any questions, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 07:37, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi RIDHVAN SHARMA! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 08:30, Monday, March 8, 2021 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: England Cricket Team in India 2021 (March 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at England Cricket Team in India 2021. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The article English cricket team in India in 2020–21 already exists.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. KK Birla Garden (March 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 18:32, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you recently removed content from 2021 Suez Canal obstruction without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Denisarona (talk) 08:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Didier Ratsiraka, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2021 Suez Canal obstruction, you may be blocked from editing. Meters (talk) 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at COVID-19 pandemic. Denisarona (talk) 08:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I humbly respect your views. Please forgive me. I'm sorry

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. K. K. Birla Garden (March 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Noah 💬 14:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked and Unblock Requests and Finally Unblocked!![edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are clearly not here to build an encyclopedia. Mjroots (talk) 15:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm very sorry. I would not do any of such acts in the future. Please forgive me and unblock me.

Decline reason:

Which acts would those be? --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 05:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to clarify that those inappropriate edits were made by my friend. I admit that I won't perform any inappropriate or abusive edits in the near future. Please unblock me. Please. I'll be very thankful to you for this act of kindness. Kindly forgive me.RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 05:25, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Thanks for clarifying that; since you seem to suggest that someone else accessed your account, it will need to remain blocked as compromised, since we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer/holding the device operating this account. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please understand me. I won't let anyone use my Wikipedia account. Please unblock me. I swear that nothing inappropriate or abusive edit will be posted by my account. Please unblock me. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 09:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As per WP:COMPROMISED, we will not consider unblocking. Yamla (talk) 10:56, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla So, please tell me what should I do to prove that my Wikipedia account is now in my control?

You can't. We don't know if you are you or the person who accessed your account, so this account must remain blocked. Actions have consequences. 331dot (talk) 14:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


No one wants you to beg. What we want is an honest assessment of your past actions and what actions you will do henceforth- including telling why you lied about someone else accessing your account. 331dot (talk) 12:29, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok @331dot.I respect your humble views. THANK YOU

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I admit that I did those inappropriate edits. I am very ashamed. I promise the whole Wikipedia community that no such edits will be performed by me in the future. If I did so then undoubtedly block me. But for now, please forgive me. Please unblock me. I won't disappoint you all. Please. I'll very thankful to you for this act of kindness.RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:29, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You created a sock puppet, User:RIDHVAN SHARMA 1234. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:20, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot @Yamla @Mjroots please review my unblock request.

Someone will review your request, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Do not alter the comments of others. 331dot (talk) 07:20, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to clarify that I created a sock puppet User:RIDHVAN SHARMA 1234. I admit that I did those inappropriate edits. I am very ashamed. I accept my all mistakes. I promise the whole Wikipedia community that no such edits will be performed by me in the future. If I did so then undoubtedly block me. But for now, please forgive me. Please unblock me. I won't disappoint you all. Please. I'll very thankful to you for this act of kindness RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:35, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm still not seeing a clear description of what, specifically, was wrong with your past edits. Such an explanation is necessary in order for us to verify that you understand what you did wrong and that you can commit to not repeating the same behavior. signed, Rosguill talk 20:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My name is Ridhvan Sharma. On 08:19, 31 March 2021 (UTC) I performed some disruptive edits on the following Wikipedia pages- 2021 Suez Canal obstruction, Didier Ratsiraka and COVID-19 pandemic. The following are the older versions of those pages which were vandalized by me.

Actually I inserted a Facebook link and removed all other useful things from those pages. I thought that it would cost me nothing. So I did it for fun. But now, many days after those inappropriate edits, I realize my mistake. I did Vandalism.
I also said in my earlier unblock requests that all those inappropriate edits were made by my friend. Actually, I lied. All edits were performed my me. I will not do it again. I accept my all mistakes. I am very well known to the phrase that Actions have consequences. Some days later after those edits, I made a sock puppet of my account. This was the sock puppet account- User:RIDHVAN SHARMA 1234. I created that sock puppet but not for illegitimate reasons. I want to clarify that I didn't created that sock puppet for abusive editing. I want to join Wikipedia again, but this time I won't perform my past mistakes.
I will help in the improvement of various Wikipedia articles. I will take many steps towards this issue so that this do not happen next time. I will contribute to the Wikipedia as much as I can. I have read all the basic rules of Wikipedia. After being unblocked I want to improve this draft - Draft:Dr. K. K. Birla Garden. After being unblocked I would also like to create an article on the West Indies tour of India 2022. I also want to update the Cricket section in Portal:Current events/Sports.
I assure you all and the whole Wikipedia community that no disprutive or inappropriate or any abusive editing won't be performed by me. If anything such happens in future then undoubtedly block me. I'm sorry. I admit my mistake. I will do correct and appropriate editing. I won't do it again. I request a second chance.(talk) 04:33, 16 April 2021 (UTC))RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:46, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; no admin has seen fit to accept this request in over 30 days. Filing a new request might be helpful. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 02:53, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: @Rosguill: Please, may I know the status of the proceedings of my unblock request as it has been more than one month since I requested unblock... I will be very grateful to you. (RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 05:08, 19 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

At this point, the request is open for another admin to review. As it has been open for more than two weeks, there's a good chance that it will be procedurally declined, at which point you would have to make a new request. As I reviewed a prior request of yours, I will not be reviewing this one. signed, Rosguill talk 18:00, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: Rosquill, please tell me the reason why my unblock request is likely to be declined? (RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC))[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RIDHVAN SHARMA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm Ridhvan Sharma. On 31 March 2021, I performed some disruptive edits on the following Wikipedia pages-
2021 Suez Canal obstruction, Didier Ratsiraka and COVID-19 pandemic.
And after those inappropriate edits I was blocked from editing Wikipedia. Initially I wrote in my unblock requests that all those edits were performed by my friend. That was lie. I made another Wikipedia account also- User:RIDHVAN SHARMA 1234. That was also blocked for sock-puppetry. I want ot inform you that I have understood my mistakes. I did Vandalism on all those pages (2021 Suez Canal obstruction, Didier Ratsiraka and COVID-19 pandemic). I can contribute Wikipedia by adding photos. I also want to improve this draft (Draft:Dr. K. K. Birla Garden) so that it can become eligible for becoming a Wikipedian article. I accept my mistakes. I won't perform any such disruptive or inappropriate edits in the future. Hence, I request a second chance. Thank you. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 05:03, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

I'm going to assume good faith and see what happens. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 18:29, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Jpgordon:. I am very grateful to you. I promise you all that I will contribute to Wikipedia by adding photos and improving articles. Thank you very much. (RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. K. K. Birla Garden (June 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Laplorfill was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Laplorfill (talk) 07:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: R.K. Chhibber (June 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
nearlyevil665 05:37, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

International cricket tours[edit]

Hi. Please don't create articles for international cricket tours that are more than a year away. While the Future Tour Programme schedules them, all the sources are just repeating the same info of x team is scheduled to play y team late into 2022. As and when cricket boards agree to the tours, then there will be enough sources to create the article. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion[edit]

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. S Philbrick(Talk) 12:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Kendriya Vidyalaya Sector-47 Chandigarh[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kendriya Vidyalaya Sector-47 Chandigarh, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–2023 ICC World Test Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Anderson. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:England tour of India 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:England tour of India 2021, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eoin Morgan[edit]

Hi. Just to note that Cricinfo are a bit slow in updating some of their stats. Morgan has won his 43rd match as captain, per the source in the article and is confirmed by the ICC too. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 08:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dr. K. K. Birla Garden[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dr. K. K. Birla Garden, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:R.K. Chhibber[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:R.K. Chhibber, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:03, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:New Zealand cricket team in Pakistan in 2022–23[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Zealand cricket team in Pakistan in 2022–23, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:00, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Australian cricket team in India in 2022–23[edit]

Information icon Hello, RIDHVAN SHARMA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Australian cricket team in India in 2022–23, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Lucknow Super Giants, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The Show preview button is right next to the Publish changes button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 15:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Thanks a lot @Blaze Wolf: RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 February 7[edit]

Please stop experimenting--thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'm sorry for that. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sector-47, Chandigarh for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sector-47, Chandigarh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kendriya Vidyalaya, Sector-47, Chandigarh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 15:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Baldev Prakash (banker) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Baldev Prakash (banker). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll look into improving it. RIDHVAN SHARMA (talk) 11:43, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Baldev Prakash (banker) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Baldev Prakash (banker). Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:04, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Virat Kohli[edit]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Virat Kohli you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Virat Kohli[edit]

The article Virat Kohli you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Virat Kohli for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:42, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RIDHVAN_SHARMA&oldid=1214985379"