User talk:Prodoom

Mute Angst Envy (band)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Mute Angst Envy (band), and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.employees.org/~mae/maebio.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Mute Angst Envy (band)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Mute Angst Envy (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 17:41, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You also want to make sure it meets WP:BAND. Gtstricky^{Talk or C} 18:22, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Contested Speedy Deletion[edit]

I left the same comment on the article's talk page, but I did want to clarify Wikipedia's licensing policy:

Please note that on the website http://www.employees.org/~mae/maebio.htm, it shows that the text is copyrighted (Copyright ©2008 Mute Angst Envy. All rights reserved shown at the bottom of the page) Assuming you are the author of the original page, when you add the text to Wikipedia you are licensing it under the GNU Free Document License. After being submitted on Wikipedia the text can be changed, copied, redistributed, and even sold for profit by third parties. As long as you are the author of the original text there is no problem with you adding it to Wikipedia, I just want to warn you that you do lose a significant amount of ownership over the text.

If you do have any questions about this feel free to reply here or on my user talk page at User_talk:Bvlax2005

Bvlax2005 (talk) 18:50, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There's nothing to stop you recreating, but you really need to add independent verifiable sources to show that they meet WP:BAND. jimfbleak (talk) 17:58, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Lisadewey.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Lisadewey.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Kitchenwhorerecords.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Kitchenwhorerecords.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisadewey.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisadewey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:44, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Prodoom (talk) re-added the picture back to the site

Orphaned non-free image File:Lisadewey.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lisadewey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:50, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lisa Dewey for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lisa Dewey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lisa Dewey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Quinn ^{░ RAIN} 22:12, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mute Angst Envy (band) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mute Angst Envy (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mute Angst Envy (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kitchen Whore Records for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kitchen Whore Records is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kitchen Whore Records until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:55, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kitchenwhorerecords.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kitchenwhorerecords.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:07, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:CiscoDevNet.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CiscoDevNet.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 22:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DevNetCreate.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DevNetCreate.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]