User talk:PolicyScientist
Welcome![edit]
Hello, PolicyScientist, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Kleuske (talk) 15:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Some quick feedback on your website[edit]
I'm quite impressed by the data visualization on Earth Facts. Quite prominently on the website, you state that we'd have about 2.5 degrees of warming in 2050 without emissions. From the included graph, that is the temperature rise corresponding to the RCP8.5 scenarios. It's a common mistake in public discourse and even in some scientific papers to equate RCP8.5 to a likely no mitigation scenario. It is instead a worst-case scenario, as explained well by the carbonbrief: [1] More likely is that we get to about 6.0 or 7.0 W/m^2 if we don't do any mitigation. Only if we're really unlucky with carbon feedbacks can we still reach RCP8.5.[2] Femke Nijsse (talk) 16:00, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Explainer: The high-emissions 'RCP8.5' global warming scenario". Carbon Brief. 2019-08-21. Retrieved 2020-03-07.
- ^ McGrath, Matt (2020-01-29). "Worst CO2 emissions scenario 'exceedingly unlikely'". BBC News. Retrieved 2020-03-07.
Thanks for the feedback, I'll have a look into this. Part of the reason for doing the website was a frustration with how difficult it is to find clear explained, reliable answers to simple questions like 'how much warming will there be in 30 years if we carry on as we are'. I appreciate that there are lots of variables and sources of uncertainty, but still think there is scope for clearer information that that in the IPCC AR5 Summary for Policymakers.